Cited by 85Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on eating behavior and diet delivered through face-to-face contact and a mobile app: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Järvelä-Reijonen, Elina, Karhunen, Leila, Sairanen, Essi, Muotka, Joona, Lindroos, Sanni, Laitinen, Jaana, Puttonen, Sampsa, Peuhkuri, Katri +6 more·2018·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internal motivation and good psychological capabilities are important factors in successful eating-related behavior change. Thus, we investigated whether general acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) affects reported eating behavior and diet quality and whether baseline perceived stress moderates the intervention effects. METHODS: (SD = 2.9), and mean age was 49.5 years (SD = 7.4). The measurements conducted before the 8-week intervention period (baseline), 10 weeks after the baseline (post-intervention), and 36 weeks after the baseline (follow-up) included clinical measurements, questionnaires of eating behavior (IES-1, TFEQ-R18, HTAS, ecSI 2.0, REBS), diet quality (IDQ), alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C), perceived stress (PSS), and 48-h dietary recall. Hierarchical linear modeling (Wald test) was used to analyze the differences in changes between groups. RESULTS: Group x time interactions showed that the subcomponent of intuitive eating (IES-1), i.e., Eating for physical rather than emotional reasons, increased in both ACT-based groups (p = .019); the subcomponent of TFEQ-R18, i.e., Uncontrolled eating, decreased in the Face-to-face group (p = .020); the subcomponent of health and taste attitudes (HTAS), i.e., Using food as a reward, decreased in the Mobile group (p = .048); and both subcomponent of eating competence (ecSI 2.0), i.e., Food acceptance (p = .048), and two subcomponents of regulation of eating behavior (REBS), i.e., Integrated and Identified regulation (p = .003, p = .023, respectively), increased in the Face-to-face group. Baseline perceived stress did not moderate effects on these particular features of eating behavior from baseline to follow-up. No statistically significant effects were found for dietary measures. CONCLUSIONS: ACT-based interventions, delivered in group sessions or by mobile app, showed beneficial effects on reported eating behavior. Beneficial effects on eating behavior were, however, not accompanied by parallel changes in diet, which suggests that ACT-based interventions should include nutritional counseling if changes in diet are targeted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01738256 ), registered 17 August, 2012.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12966-018-0654-8

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [21]Tribole E Resch E Intuitive eating: a recovery book for the chronic dieter 1995 New York St. Martin’s Press
  2. [45]Goldberg D The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Maudsley monograph no. 21 1972 Oxford Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Järvelä-Reijonen, E., Karhunen, L., Sairanen, E., Muotka, J., Lindroos, S., Laitinen, J., Puttonen, S., Peuhkuri, K., Hallikainen, M., Pihlajamäki, J., Korpela, R., Ermes, M., Lappalainen, R., & Kolehmainen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Karlstad University (SE)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2018-02-27
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
22-22
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793027590
Cited by
85
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digitala vetenskapliga arkivet (Diva) (Karlstad University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Tekes (1104/10)
  • The Diabetes Research Foundation, Finland
  • Doctoral Programme in Nutrition of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, dietary habits, diet quality, mobile health apps, face-to-face intervention, perceived stress, intuitive eating, uncontrolled eating, food as reward, eating competence, food acceptance, food intake regulation, nutrition counseling
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Adult, Diet, Eating, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Finland, Health Education, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Intuition, Overweight, Mobile Applications, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review