Actor-to-actor dissemination of electronic procurement (EP) adoption: an exploration of influencing factors
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Training influences the perceived effort involved in using such technologies by individuals within the organisation.
“and subsequently in influencing the perceived effort involved in using such technologies by individuals within the organisation (Reunis et al., 2004).”
From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Reunis et al., 2004
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,557 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709 · see citing works
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066 · see citing works
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455 · see citing works
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176 · see citing works
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006 · see citing works
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
Conner, M. T., & McMillan, B. (2004) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 4,462 · see citing works
Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.1.1 · Cited by 3,351 · see citing works
Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach
Cooper, R. B., & Zmud, R. W. (1990) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123 · Cited by 2,773 · see citing works
Hayward, G. (1984) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/0166-4972(84)90018-x · Cited by 2,771 · see citing works
Measuring Consumer Innovativeness
Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02726497 · Cited by 1,460 · see citing works
Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00152-1 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(97)00006-7 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Pentland, B. T. (1995) · Accounting Management and Information Technologies · doi:10.1016/0959-8022(95)90011-x · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Enterprise resource planning: Managing the implementation process
Mabert, V. A., Soni, A. K., & Venkataramanan, M. A. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00551-9 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Electronic marketplaces: A literature review and a call for supply chain management research
Grieger, M. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00394-6 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement
de Boer, L., Harink, J., & Heijboer, G. (2002) · European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management · doi:10.1016/s0969-7012(01)00015-6 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Organization Development: A Process of Learning and Changing
Burke, W. W., & Noumair, D. A. (2015) · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Purchasing and supply chain management : analysis, planning and practice
van Weele, A. J. (2000) · Thomson Learning eBooks · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Viral Marketing - Establishing Customer Relationships by 'Word-of-mouse'
Helm, S. (2000) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1080/10196780050177053 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Osmonbekov, T., Bello, D. C., & Gilliland, D. I. (2002) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/08858620210419781 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Word-of-Mouth Communication in the Industrial Adoption Process
Martilla, J. A. (1971) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377100800203 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Mirvis, P. H., Sales, A. L., & Hackett, E. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.3930300107 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Managerial Influences on Intraorganizational Information Technology Use: A Principal‐Agent Model
Bhattacherjee, A. (1998) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01347.x · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Determinants of corporate adoption of e-Marketplace: an innovation theory perspective
Joo, Y.-B., & Kim, Y. (2004) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2004.01.001 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
The Effects of Process Characteristics on the Value of B2B E-Procurement
Subramaniam, C., & Shaw, M. J. (2003) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1023/b:item.0000008080.17926.2b · Cited by 106 · see citing works
IT-enabled business process reengineering: organizational and human resource dimensions
Willcocks, L. P., & Smith, G. (1995) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/0963-8687(95)96806-j · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Changing supplier selection and relationship practices: a contagion process
Kamann, D. F., & Bakker, E. F. (2004) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2003.12.002 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Harris, L. C. (2002) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2002.11501920 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Preferred pathways of behavioral contagion
Jones, M. B., & Jones, D. R. (1995) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(95)00010-3 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Users' reactions to information technology: some multivariate models and their implications
Clegg, C., Carey, N., Dean, G., Hornby, P., & Bolden, R. (1997) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1080/026839697345189 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Uncovering the strategic domain of e-procurement
Knudsen, D. (2002) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 25 · see citing works
der Ingenieurwissenschaften, D. (2002) · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Design of an E-Procurement Adoption Model (EPAM)
Reunis, M. R. B., van Raaij, E. M., & Santema, S. C. (2004) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationAn integrated theory of motivation
Westbrook, J. D. (1982) · Engineering Management International · doi:10.1016/0167-5419(82)90018-7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
E-Procurement adoption in the Southcoast SMEs
Gunasekaran, A., McGaughey, R. E., Ngai, E. W. T., & Rai, B. K. (2009) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.05.013 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement
Brandon-Jones, A., & Kauppi, K. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2015-0346 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
“, 2014) and subsequently in influencing the perceived effort involved in using such technologies by individuals within the organisation (Reunis et al., 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialWhat is the value of an IT e-procurement system?
Ronchi, S., Brun, A., Golini, R., & Fan, X. (2010) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2010.03.013 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Al‐Okaily, M., Almajali, D., Al-Okaily, A., & Majali, T. (2023) · Journal of financial reporting & accounting · doi:10.1108/jfra-05-2023-0277 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The impact of user‐perceived e‐procurement quality on system and contract compliance
Brandon‐Jones, A., & Carey, S. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111111928 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“Building on previous literature (Harink, 2003; Croom and Johnson, 2003; Reunis et al. 2004; Croom and Brandon-Jones, 2007), we argue that how the user (as an internal customer) perceives the quality of e-procurement provision is important in influencing levels of system and contract use.”
BackgroundMethodResultSánchez-Rodríguez, C., Martínez-Lorente, A. R., & Hemsworth, D. (2020) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-12-2018-0413 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
A conceptual case‐based model for knowledge sharing among supply chain members
Wang, C., Fergusson, C., Perry, D., & Antony, J. (2008) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150810864907 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Emerging issues of procurement management: a review and prospect
Hong, P. C., & Kwon, H. B. (2012) · International Journal of Procurement Management · doi:10.1504/ijpm.2012.047199 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Technology adoption needs to be implemented in a way not to diminish relationships which would have been achieved via face to face transactions with procurement entities (Reunis et al., 2004; Ronchi et al., 2010; Teo et al., 2009; Tatsis et al., 2006).”
BackgroundHawkins, T. G., Gravier, M., Berkowitz, D. K., & Muir, W. A. (2015) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2014.12.007 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“The meso-level represents the space where individual actors shape organization-level outcomes, which has been called an unexplored area of purchasing research (Reunis et al., 2004).”
BackgroundAn empirical test of contributing factors to different forms of maverick buying
Karjalainen, K., & van Raaij, E. M. (2011) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2011.05.001 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Increasing e-ordering adoption: A case study
Reunis, M. R. B., Santema, S. C., & Harink, J. H. A. (2006) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2007.01.006 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationAdoption of e-procurement in the government departments
Padhi, S. S., & Mohapatra, P. K. J. (2009) · Electronic Government an International Journal · doi:10.1504/eg.2010.029890 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Governance Issues in the EU's e‐Procurement Framework
Khorana, S., Ferguson‐Boucher, K., & Kerr, W. A. (2014) · JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.12179 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“…2010c, p. 2) – that is, electronic integration and management of procurement activities including purchase requests, authorization, ordering, delivery and payment between purchasers and suppliers (Reunis et al., 2004, p. 203; Tatsis et al., 2006, p. 63; IDC 2012, p. 77; PWC, 2011, p. 5).”
BackgroundThe acceptance and use of e-procurement systems
Purchase, S., & Dooley, K. (2010) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675561003801063 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“This approach minimises confusion for the respondents and has been used by previous researchers (de Boer et al. 2002, Reunis et al. 2004,Wu et al. 2007).”
BackgroundMethodPositive and negative impacts of the adoption of e-procurement solutions: the Italian market case
Belisari, S., Appolloni, A., & Cerruti, C. (2019) · International Journal of Procurement Management · doi:10.1504/ijpm.2019.098553 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Antecedents of acceptance model for e-procurement in Jordanian public shareholding firms
Almajali, D., Majali, T., Masa’deh, R. M. T., Al-Bashayreh, M. G., & Altamimi, A. M. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-12-2021-5075 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The structure of determinants of individual adoption and use of e-ordering systems
Arbin, K. (2008) · Human Systems Management · doi:10.3233/hsm-2008-0676 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A structural model for sales in the e-retailing industry
Serrano‐Cinca, C., Callén, Y. F., & Molinero, C. M. (2009) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.2009.93 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Reunis et al (2004), in their study on the actor-to-actor dissemination of electronic procurement adoption, find a parallelism between viral marketing and the concept of social contagion from social network theory.”
BackgroundInformation Technology readiness index for adoption of e-procurement
Padhi, S. S., & Mohapatra, P. K. J. (2011) · Electronic Government, an International Journal · doi:10.1504/eg.2011.037695 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Scale Development for E-Procurement (EP) Adoption Influence Tactics
Reunis, M. R. B., & van Raaij, E. M. (2006) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationThe exploration of B2B e-auction adaptation strategy in Taiwan
Yu, Y., Lin, Y.-T., Chen, Y.-H., & Chen, J. K. C. (2010) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Acceptance of E-procurement in Organisations: Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
Maddi, M. S., Davis, P., & Geraghty, J. (2020) · International Journal of Database Management Systems · doi:10.5121/ijdms.2020.12203 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Common SEM methods include discriminant validity, confirmatory factor analysis and latent growth modelling [2], [40],[41].”
Performance measurement and performance management of innovative products
Dickinson, G. (2008) · The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Extent of Adoption as Opposed to Adoption: Case of E-Procurement
Hassan, H., Tretiakov, A., & Whiddett, D. (2010) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Az elektronikus beszerzés és beszerzés-digitalizáció előnyeinek értékelése Magyarországon
Tátrai, T., & Vörösmarty, G. (2025) · Marketing & Menedzsment · doi:10.15170/mm.2024.58.04.07 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Theoretical Model of E-Business Infusion in Manufacturer-Reseller Relationships
Osmonbekov, T., Xie, F. T., & Johnston, W. J. (2009) · Journal of business market management · doi:10.1007/s12087-009-0026-4
Maddi, M. S. (2016) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)
Understanding Employee Environmental Behaviour In Professional Service Firms
Thirlaway, K., Piercy, N. C., & Brandon‐Jones, A. (2014) · Developments in marketing science: proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10912-1_22
Acceptance of e-procurement in organisationsPreprint
Maddi, M. S., Davis, P., & Geraghty, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.10094
“Common SEM methods include discriminant validity, confirmatory factor analysis and latent growth modelling [2], [40],[41].”
The Determinants of Contract Compliance in E- Procurement and Distribution Industry in MalaysiaPreprint
Jarau, J. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3090130
(2018) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Science Engineering and Technology · doi:10.32628/ijsrset21841115
“, [3]; Knudsen, [10]; Reunis [14]; Schoenherr & Tummala, [15]; Teo, Lin and Lai [16].”
- Authors
- Reunis, M. R. B., van Raaij, E. M., & Santema, S. C.
- Affiliations
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Reunis, Marc R.B.
- ORCID
- Santema, Sicco C.
- Venue
- Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 201-210
- ISSN
- 1478-4092 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967926036
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Keywords
- e-procurement, technology adoption, technology implementation, perceived benefits, organizational communication, training, risk mitigation, reward, dispositions, procurement organization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
