CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phytoliths from native plants and surface soils from the Upper Madeira river, SW Amazonia, and their potential for paleoecological reconstruction

Watling, Jennifer, Castro, Martín Torres, Simon, Marcelo F., Rodrigues, Flavio O., Brilhante de Medeiros, Marcelo, De Oliveira, Paulo E., Neves, Eduardo G.·2020·Quaternary International
DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.045
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low abundances of phytoliths from grasses and herbs (< 4%) reflect closed canopy forested settings.

    “This and other Neotropical studies show that high abundances of arboreal phytoliths (> 60%) and low abundances of phytoliths from grasses and herbs (< 4%) reflect closed canopy forested settings (Dickau et al. 2013; Heijink et al. 2020; Watling et al. 2020; Piperno et al. 2021).”

    From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Watling et al. 2020

  • High abundances of arboreal phytoliths (> 60%) reflect closed canopy forested settings.

    “This and other Neotropical studies show that high abundances of arboreal phytoliths (> 60%) and low abundances of phytoliths from grasses and herbs (< 4%) reflect closed canopy forested settings (Dickau et al. 2013; Heijink et al. 2020; Watling et al. 2020; Piperno et al. 2021).”

    From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Watling et al. 2020

  • Phytolith assemblages vary among major forest types in Neotropical humid and dry forests and savannas.

    “Phytolith assemblages are known to vary among major forest types in Neotropical humid and dry forests and savannas (Dickau et al. 2013; Testé et al. 2020; Watling et al. 2020; Crifò and Strömberg 2021).”

    From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Watling et al. 2020

  • Baseline data of the variance in phytolith representation across gradients of disturbance have not been fully documented in Amazonia.

    “baseline data of the variance in phytolith representation across gradients of disturbance have not been fully documented”

    From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Watling et al. 2020

  • Ordination did not separate palm forests (mostly Attalea sp.) from other forests in Brazil.

    “Previous studies have shown that Euterpe can dominate the phytolith assemblage in flooded forests (Dickau et al. 2013), but ordination did not separate palm forests (mostly Attalea sp.) from other forests in Brazil (Watling et al. 2020).”

    From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Watling et al. 2020

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Adeney, 2016, White-sand ecosystems in Amazonia, Biotropica, 48, 7, 10.1111/btp.12293 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Alexandre, 1997, Phytoliths: indicators of grassland dynamics during the late Holocene in intertropical Africa, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 136, 213, 10.1016/S0031-0182(97)00089-8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Alves-Pereira, 2018, Patterns of nuclear and chloroplast genetic diversity and structure of manioc along major Brazilian Amazonian rivers, Ann. Bot., 121, 625, 10.1093/aob/mcx190 · DOI
  4. Barboni, 2009, Phytoliths of East African grasses: an assessment of their environmental and taxonomic significance based on floristic data, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 158, 29, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.07.002 · DOI
  5. Barros Ferraz, 2005, Landscape dynamics of Amazonian deforestation between 1984 and 2002 in central Rondônia, Brazil: assessment and future scenarios, For. Ecol. Manag., 204, 69, 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.073 · DOI
  6. Beal, 1886, The bulliform or hydroscopic cells of grasses and sedges compared, Bot. Gaz., 2, 321, 10.1086/326044 · DOI
  7. BFG, 2015, Growing knowledge: an overview of Seed Plant diversity in Brazil, Rodriguesia, 66, 1085, 10.1590/2175-7860201566411 · DOI
  8. Boyd, 2002, Identification of anthropogenic burning in the paleoecological record of the Northern Prairies: a new approach, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 92, 471, 10.1111/1467-8306.00300 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bozarth, 1990, Diagnostic opal phytoliths from pods of selected varieties of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), Am. Antiq., 55, 98, 10.2307/281495 · DOI
  10. Bremond, 2005, Grass water stress estimated from phytoliths in West Africa, J. Biogeogr., 32, 311, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01162.x · DOI
  11. Caldarelli, 2017, A ocupação pré-colonial da Bacia do Rio Madeira: novos dados e problemáticas associadas, Especiaria - Cadernos de Ciências Humanas, 17, 229
  12. Capriles, 2019, Persistent early to middle Holocene tropical foraging in southwestern Amazonia, Sci. Adv., 5, 1, 10.1126/sciadv.aav5449 · DOI
  13. Carson, 2015, Pre-Columbian land use in the ring-ditch region of the Bolivian Amazon, Holocene, 25, 1285, 10.1177/0959683615581204 · DOI
  14. Chandler-Ezell, 2006, Root and tuber phytoliths and starch grains document manioc (Manihot escuelenta), arrowroot (Maranta aruniacea), and llerén (Calathea sp.) at the Real Alto site, Ecuador, Econ. Bot., 60, 103, 10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[103:RATPAS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  15. Chen, 2013, Phytolith variability in Zingiberales: a tool for the reconstruction of past tropical vegetation, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 370, 1, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.10.026 · DOI
  16. Clement, 2016, Crop domestication in the upper Madeira River basin, Bol. Mus. Para. Emilio Goeldi, 11, 193, 10.1590/1981.81222016000100010 · DOI
  17. Collura, 2017, Wood and bark phytoliths of West African woody plants, Quat. Int., 434, 142, 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.070 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Diaz, 2016, Phytoliths produced by common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), achira (Canna indica L.), and squash (Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché), crop species from Boyacá, Colombia, Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat., 40, 137, 10.18257/raccefyn.274 · DOI
  19. Dickau, 2012, Diversity of cultivars and other plant resources used at habitation sites in the Llanos de Mojos, Beni, Bolivia: evidence from macrobotanical remains, starch grains, and phytoliths, J. Archaeol. Sci., 39, 357, 10.1016/j.jas.2011.09.021 · DOI
  20. Dickau, 2013, Differentiation of neotropical ecosystems by modern soil phytolith assemblages and its implications for palaeoenvironmental and archaeological reconstructions, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 193, 15, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2013.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dickau, 2016, Reconstructing pre-Colombian agricultural practices in the Bolivian savannah: stratigraphic and phytolith evidence from raised fields at Campo España, western Llanos de Moxos, Cadernos de Lepaarq, 13, 224
  22. Eichhorn, 2010, Seed phytoliths in West African Commelinaceae and their potential for palaeoecological studies, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 298, 300, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.10.004 · DOI
  23. Fernández Honaine, 2006, Phytolith assemblages and systematic associations in grassland species of the South-eastern Pampean plains, Argentina, Ann. Bot., 98, 1155, 10.1093/aob/mcl207 · DOI
  24. Fredlund, 1994, Modern phytolith assemblages from the north American great plains, J. Biogeogr., 21, 321, 10.2307/2845533 · DOI
  25. Hammer, 2001, PAST: paleontological statistics software package from education and data aanlysis, Palaeontol. Electron., 4
  26. Hilbert, 2017, Evidence for mid-Holocene rice domestication in the Americas, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 1, 1693, 10.1038/s41559-017-0322-4 · DOI
  27. ICPN, 2019, International Code for phytolith nomenclature (ICPN) 2.0, Ann. Bot., 124, 189, 10.1093/aob/mcz064 · DOI
  28. Iriarte, 2009, Phytolith analysis of selected native plants and modern soils from southeastern Uruguay and its implications for paleoenvironmental and archeological reconstruction, Quat. Int., 193, 99, 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.10.008 · DOI
  29. Jattisha, 2012, Phytoliths as a tool for the identification of some Chloridoideae grasses in Kerala, ISRN Bot., 1
  30. Kealhofer, 1998, Opal phytoliths of southeast Asia, Smithsonian Contrib. Bot., 88, 1, 10.5479/si.0081024X.88 · DOI
  31. Lombardo, 2013, Early and middle Holocene hunter-gatherer occupations in western Amazonia: the hidden shell middens, PloS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0072746 · DOI
  32. Lombardo, 2016, Sonication improves the efficiency, efficacy and safety of phytolith extraction, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 235, 1, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2016.09.008 · DOI
  33. Lombardo, 2019, Holocene land cover change in southwestern Amazonia inferred from paleoflood archives, Global Planet. Change, 174, 105, 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.01.008 · DOI
  34. Lu, 2002, Morphological variations of lobate phytoliths from grasses in China and the south-eastern United States, Divers. Distrib., 9, 73, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00166.x · DOI
  35. Lu, 2003, Phytoliths of common grasses in the coastal environments of southeastern USA, Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci., 58, 587, 10.1016/S0272-7714(03)00137-9 · DOI
  36. Marques, 2004, Trace element geochemistry in Brazilian Cerrado soils, Geoderma, 121, 31, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.10.003 · DOI
  37. Mayle, 2007, Long-term forest-savannah dynamics in the Bolivian Amazon: implications for conservation, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci., 362, 291
  38. Mazumdar, 2011, Phytoliths of pteridophytes, South Afr. J. Bot., 77, 10, 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.07.020 · DOI
  39. McMichael, 2012, Sparse pre-Columbian human habitation in western Amazonia, Science, 336, 1429, 10.1126/science.1219982 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Mercader, 2009, Phytoliths in woody plants from the Miombo woodlands of Mozambique, Ann. Bot., 104, 91, 10.1093/aob/mcp097 · DOI
  41. Mercader, 2011, Soil phytoliths from miombo woodlands in Mozambique, Quat. Res., 75, 138, 10.1016/j.yqres.2010.09.008 · DOI
  42. Morcote-Ríos, 2016, Phytoliths as a tool for archaeobotanical, palaeobotanical and palaeoecological studies in Amazonian palms, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 182, 348, 10.1111/boj.12438 · DOI
  43. Moser, 2014, Tree species distribution along environmental gradients in an area affected by a hydroelectric dam in Southern Amazonia, Biotropica, 46, 367, 10.1111/btp.12111 · DOI
  44. Mulder, 1952, Soil manganese in relation to plant growth, Adv. Agron., 4, 221, 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60310-7 · DOI
  45. Novello, 2012, Phytolith signal of aquatic plants and soils in Chad, Central Africa, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 178, 43, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.03.010 · DOI
  46. Olsen, 1999, Evidence on the origin of cassava - phylogeography of Manihot esculenta, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 5586, 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5586 · DOI
  47. Parr, 2006, Effect of fire on phytolith coloration, Geoarchaeology, 21, 643, 10.1002/gea.20102 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Perigolo, 2017, Vegetation types of the upper Madeira river in Rondônia, Brazil, Brittonia, 69, 423, 10.1007/s12228-017-9505-1 · DOI
  49. Pessenda, 1998, The carbon isotope record in soils along a forest-cerrado ecosystem transect: implications for vegetation changes in the Rondonia state, southwestern Brazilian Amazon region, Holocene, 8, 599, 10.1191/095968398673187182 · DOI
  50. Piperno, 1989, The occurrence of phytoliths in the reproductive structures of selected tropical angiosperms and their significance in tropical paleoecology, paleoethnobotany and systematics, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 61, 147, 10.1016/0034-6667(89)90067-5 · DOI
  51. Piperno, 1994, Phytolith and charcoal evidence for prehistoric slash-and-burn agriculture in the Darien rain forest of Panama, Holocene, 4, 321, 10.1177/095968369400400312 · DOI
  52. Piperno, 2011, The origins of plant cultivation and domestication in the New World tropics: patterns, process, and new developments, Curr. Anthropol., 52, S453, 10.1086/659998 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Piperno, 1998, The silica bodies of tropical American grasses: morphology, taxonomy, and implications for grass systematics and fossil phytolith identification, Smithsonian Contrib. Bot., 85, 1, 10.5479/si.0081024X.85 · DOI
  54. Quesada, 2011, Soils of Amazonia with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites, Biogeosciences, 8, 1415, 10.5194/bg-8-1415-2011 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Rovner, 1971, Potential of opal phytoliths for use in paleoecological reconstruction, Quat. Res., 69, 343, 10.1016/0033-5894(71)90070-6 · DOI
  56. Runge, 1999, The opal phytolith inventory of soils in central Africa —quantities, shapes, classification, and spectra, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 107, 23, 10.1016/S0034-6667(99)00018-4 · DOI
  57. Scurfield, 1974, Silica in woody stems, J. Bot., 22, 211
  58. Smith, 2010, Fire favours expansion of bamboo-dominated forests in the south-west Amazon, J. Trop. Ecol., 27, 59, 10.1017/S026646741000057X · DOI
  59. Steege, 2019, Towards a dynamic list of Amazonian tree species, Sci. Rep., 9, 1
  60. Wallis, 2003, An overview of leaf phytolith production patterns in selected northwest Australian flora, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 125, 201, 10.1016/S0034-6667(03)00003-4 · DOI
  61. Watling, 2013, Phytoliths from the coastal savannas of French Guiana, Quat. Int., 287, 162, 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.10.030 · DOI
  62. Watling, 2015, Subsistence practices among earthwork builders: phytolith evidence from archaeological sites in the southwest Amazonian interfluves, J. Archaeol. Sci.: Report, 4, 541
  63. Watling, 2016, Differentiation of neotropical ecosystems by modern soil phytoliths assemblages and its implications for palaeoenvironmental and archaeological reconstructions II: southwestern Amazonian forests, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 226, 30, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.12.002 · DOI
  64. Watling, 2017, Impact of pre-Columbian “geoglyph” builders on Amazonian forests, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am., 114, 1868, 10.1073/pnas.1614359114 · DOI
  65. Watling, 2018, Direct archaeological evidence for Southwestern Amazonia as an early plant domestication and food production centre, PloS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0199868 · DOI
  66. Whitney, 2013, Pre-Columbian landscape impact and agriculture in the Monumental Mound region of the Llanos de Moxos, lowland Bolivia, Quat. Res., 80, 207, 10.1016/j.yqres.2013.06.005 · DOI
  67. Whitney, 2014, Pre-Columbian raised-field agriculture and land use in the Bolivian Amazon, Holocene, 24, 231, 10.1177/0959683613517401 · DOI
  68. Zuloaga, 2003, Catalogue of new world grasses (Poaceae): III. Subfamilies Panicoideae, aristidoideae, Arundinoideae, and danthonioideae, Contrib. U. S. Natl. Herb., 46

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Watling, J., Castro, M. T., Simon, M. F., Rodrigues, F. O., Brilhante de Medeiros, M., De Oliveira, P. E., & Neves, E. G.
Venue
Quaternary International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
550
Pages
85-110
ISSN
1040-6182
DOI
10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.045
Cited by
31
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2014/21207\u20135, 2017/09718-2, 2017/25157-0)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review