Cited by 333Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Hominin evolution in settings of strong environmental variability

Potts, Richard·2013·Quaternary Science Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.04.003

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Potts, R.
Affiliations
Smithsonian Institution (US)
Corresponding author
Potts, Richard
Venue
Quaternary Science Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
73
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0277-3791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999990262
Cited by
333
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
79.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quaternary Science Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
hominin evolution, environmental variability, climate change, East African Rift, paleoenvironmental indicators, deep-sea oxygen isotopes, lake sediments, tropical Africa, habitat instability, adaptive response, stone technology, sociality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review