Cited by 86Psychedelics and Drug StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Psychedelics, Sociality, and Human Evolution

Open access
Rodríguez Arce, José Manuel, Winkelman, Michael James·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Our hominin ancestors inevitably encountered and likely ingested psychedelic mushrooms throughout their evolutionary history. This assertion is supported by current understanding of: early hominins’ paleodiet and paleoecology; primate phylogeny of mycophagical and self-medicative behaviors; and the biogeography of psilocybin-containing fungi. These lines of evidence indicate mushrooms (including bioactive species) have been a relevant resource since the Pliocene, when hominins intensified exploitation of forest floor foods. Psilocybin and similar psychedelics that primarily target the serotonin 2A receptor subtype stimulate an active coping strategy response that may provide an enhanced capacity for adaptive changes through a flexible and associative mode of cognition. Such psychedelics also alter emotional processing, self-regulation, and social behavior, often having enduring effects on individual and group well-being and sociality. A homeostatic and drug instrumentalization perspective suggests that incidental inclusion of psychedelics in the diet of hominins, and their eventual addition to rituals and institutions of early humans could have conferred selective advantages. Hominin evolution occurred in an ever-changing, and at times quickly changing, environmental landscape and entailed advancement into a socio-cognitive niche, i.e., the development of a socially interdependent lifeway based on reasoning, cooperative communication, and social learning. In this context, psychedelics’ effects in enhancing sociality, imagination, eloquence, and suggestibility may have increased adaptability and fitness. We present interdisciplinary evidence for a model of psychedelic instrumentalization focused on four interrelated instrumentalization goals: management of psychological distress and treatment of health problems; enhanced social interaction and interpersonal relations; facilitation of collective ritual and religious activities; and enhanced group decision-making. The socio-cognitive niche was simultaneously a selection pressure and an adaptive response, and was partially constructed by hominins through their activities and their choices. Therefore, the evolutionary scenario put forward suggests that integration of psilocybin into ancient diet, communal practice, and proto-religious activity may have enhanced hominin response to the socio-cognitive niche, while also aiding in its creation. In particular, the interpersonal and prosocial effects of psilocybin may have mediated the expansion of social bonding mechanisms such as laughter, music, storytelling, and religion, imposing a systematic bias on the selective environment that favored selection for prosociality in our lineage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.729425

Cites

306 of 306 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 308 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Barrett H. C. Cosmides L. Tooby J. (2007). “ The hominid entry into the cognitive niche,” in The Evolution Of Mind: Fundamental Questions And Controversies, eds Gangestad S. W. Simpson J. A. (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 241– 248.
  2. Doyle R. M. (2011). Darwin’s Pharmacy: Sex, Plants, and the Evolution of the Noösphere. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
  3. Durkheim E. (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. (K. E. Fields, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  4. Eliade M. (1972). Shamanism: Archaic Techniques Of Ecstasy (W. R. Trask, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  5. Hugh-Jones S. (1996). “ Shamans, prophets, priests and pastors,” in Shamanism, History, and the State, eds Thomas N. Humphrey C. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 32– 75.
  6. Kennedy D. O. (2014). Plants and the Human Brain. New York NY: Oxford University Press.
  7. Klein R. G. (1999). The Human Career: Human Biological and Cultural Origins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  8. Langdon E. J. M. (1992). “ Introduction: shamanism and anthropology,” in Portals of Power: Shamanism in South America, eds Langdon E. J. M. Baer G. (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press), 1– 21.
  9. Lifshitz M. Sheiner E. Kirmayer L. J. (2018). “ Cultural neurophenomenology of psychedelic thought: guiding the “unconstrained” mind through ritual context,” in The Oxford Handbook of Spontaneous Thought: Mind-Wandering, Creativity, and Dreaming, eds Christoff L. Fox K. C. R. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 573– 594.
  10. Munn H. (1973). “ The mushrooms of language,” in Hallucinogens and Shamanism, ed. Harner M. J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 86– 122.
  11. Samorini G. (2020). “ Mushroom effigies in archaeology: a methodological approach,” in Fly Agaric. A Compendium of History, Pharmacology, Mythology, and Exploration, ed. Feeney K. (Ellensburg, WA: Fly Agaric Press), 269– 296.
  12. Silk J. B. (2007). “ Who lived in the environment of evolutionary adaptedness?,” in The Evolution of Mind: Fundamental Questions and Controversies, eds Gangestad S. W. Simpson J. A. (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 103– 110.
  13. Tooby J. Devore I. (1987). “ The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling,” in The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models, ed. Kinzey W. G. (New York, NY: State University of New York Press), 183– 237.
  14. Turner V. W. (1964). “ A ndembu doctor in practice,” in Magic, Faith and Healing, ed. Kiev A. (New York, NY: Free Press).
  15. Wink M. van Wyk B. (2008). Mind-Altering and Poisonous Plants of the World: A Scientifically Accurate Guide to 1200 Toxic and Intoxicating Plants. Portland: Timber Press.
  16. Winkelman M. J. (2004). “ Spirits as human nature and the fundamental structures of consciousness,” in From Shaman to Scientist Essays on Humanity’s Search for Spirits, ed. Houran J. (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press), 59– 96.
  17. Winkelman M. J. (2019b). “ The evolutionary origins of the supernatural in ritual behaviors,” in The Supernatural After the Neuro-Turn, eds Craffert P. Baker J. Winkelman M. (London: Routledge), 48– 68.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodríguez Arce, J. M., & Winkelman, M. J.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-09-29
Volume
12
Pages
729425-729425
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3204171992
Cited by
86
References
308
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
psychedelics, psilocybin, hominin evolution, sociality, mycophagy, paleodiet, paleoecology, 5-HT2A receptor, prosocial behavior, social bonding, religion and ritual, group decision making, psychological distress, Pliocene

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review