Cited by 36Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiology practices and educationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Assessment of MRI technologists in acceptance and willingness to integrate artificial intelligence into practice

Abuzaid, M.M., Tekin, H.O., Reza, M., Elhag, I.R., Elshami, W.·2021·Radiography

Abstract

Introduction The integration of AI in medical imaging has tremendous exponential growth, especially in image production, image processing and image interpretation. It is expected that radiographers working across all imaging modalities have adequate knowledge as they are part of the end-user team. The current study aimed to investigate the knowledge, willingness and challenges facing the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technologists in the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into MRI practice.Methods Total of 120 participants were recruited using a snowball sampling technique. A two-phase study was undertaken using survey and focus group discussion (FGD) to capture participants' knowledge, interpretations, needs and obstacles toward AI integrations in MRI practice. The survey and FGD provided the base to understand the participant's' knowledge, acceptance and needs for AI.Results Results showed medium to high knowledge, excitement about AI integration without disturbance of MRI practice. Participants thought that AI can improve MRI protocol selection (91.8%), reduce the scan time (65.3%), and improve image post-processing (79.5%). Education and learning resources concerning AI were the main obstacles facing MRI technologists.Conclusion MRI technologists have the knowledge and possess basic technical information. The application of AI in MRI practice might greatly influence and improve MRI technologist's work. A structured and professional program should be integrated in both undergraduate and continuous education to prepare for effective AI implementation.Implications for practice Application of AI in MRI can be used in many aspects, such as optimize image quality and avoidance of image artifacts. Moreover, AI can play an important role in patient's safety at the MRI unit to reduce incidents. Education, infrastructure, and knowledge of end-users are keys for the incorporation of AI use, development and optimisation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.007

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abuzaid, M. M., Tekin, H. O., Reza, M., Elhag, I. R., & Elshami, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Sharjah (AE)
  • Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (AE)
Corresponding author
Elshami, W.
Venue
Radiography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
27
Pages
S83-S87
ISSN
1078-8174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3187241719
Cited by
36
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence, radiographers, technology acceptance, AI knowledge, AI adoption barriers, AI education and training, image post-processing, continuing professional development
MeSH terms
Allied Health Personnel, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radiography, Radiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review