Cited by 710Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingAI in cancer detection

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Radiology: Opportunities, Challenges, Pitfalls, and Criteria for Success

Thrall, James H., Li, Xiang, Li, Quanzheng, Cruz, Cinthia, Do, Synho, Dreyer, Keith, Brink, James·2018·Journal of the American College of Radiology

Abstract

Worldwide interest in artificial intelligence (AI) applications, including imaging, is high and growing rapidly, fueled by availability of large datasets ("big data"), substantial advances in computing power, and new deep-learning algorithms. Apart from developing new AI methods per se, there are many opportunities and challenges for the imaging community, including the development of a common nomenclature, better ways to share image data, and standards for validating AI program use across different imaging platforms and patient populations. AI surveillance programs may help radiologists prioritize work lists by identifying suspicious or positive cases for early review. AI programs can be used to extract "radiomic" information from images not discernible by visual inspection, potentially increasing the diagnostic and prognostic value derived from image datasets. Predictions have been made that suggest AI will put radiologists out of business. This issue has been overstated, and it is much more likely that radiologists will beneficially incorporate AI methods into their practices. Current limitations in availability of technical expertise and even computing power will be resolved over time and can also be addressed by remote access solutions. Success for AI in imaging will be measured by value created: increased diagnostic certainty, faster turnaround, better outcomes for patients, and better quality of work life for radiologists. AI offers a new and promising set of methods for analyzing image data. Radiologists will explore these new pathways and are likely to play a leading role in medical applications of AI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.026

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training with diverse data from multiple sites without centralizing data can mitigate the problems of narrow training data.

    “This can be mitigated by training with diverse data from multiple sites without centralising data33 using methods such as Transfer Learning34,35 or FL.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thrall, J. H., Li, X., Li, Q., Cruz, C., Do, S., Dreyer, K., & Brink, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Thrall, James H.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
504-508
ISSN
1546-1440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2785645041
Cited by
710
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 16
FWCI
16.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
artificial intelligence in radiology, machine learning, deep learning, radiomics, radiologist role, clinical implementation of AI, image data sharing, nomenclature
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Forecasting, Humans, Radiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review