The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preliminary evidence suggesting caution in the use of psychiatric self-report measures with adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated the utility of self-report measures to screen for psychiatric comorbidities in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Thirty-eight 10-17 year olds with an ASD and without mental retardation completed: the Children's Depression Inventory-Short version (CDI-S), Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS), Conners-Wells Adolescent Self-report Scale-Short edition (CASS-S), and Short Leyton Obsessional Inventory-Child Version (SLOI-CV). Their parents were interviewed with the Autism Comorbidity Interview-Present and Lifetime (ACI-PL) to establish psychiatric diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and reliability coefficients were calculated for each self-report and compared to values from literature. The CDI-S and CASS-S yielded a high number of false negatives, with lower sensitivities and specificities in the sample than the literature. There was a nearly significant difference in total mean RCMAS scores between participants with and without anxiety, though again the means for both groups were below the threshold of concern. The SLOI-CV yielded a high false positive rate. All four instruments had reliability coefficients comparable to literature values. Results must be considered preliminary due to sample size. However, the findings suggest that although self-report instruments may provide useful information in the diagnosis of psychiatric comorbidities in ASD, caution must be exercised in their interpretation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Consequently, researchers have often avoided attending to first‐person testimony, preferring to privilege reports from parents, teachers or other informants, or laboratory‐based observation over considering the perspectives of the person themselves (Jaswal & Akhtar, 2018; Mazefsky, Kao, & Oswald, 2011; McGeer, 2004; Milton, 2012).”
From Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science (2022) · cites this paper as Mazefsky, Kao, & Oswald, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“First, alexithymia, or difficulty identifying, distinguishing, and describing emotions, has been well-documented in ASD.17,18,19”
From Emotion Regulation (2014) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Widiger, T. A. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10518-009 · Cited by 19,766
Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02172145 · Cited by 9,065
Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., Pickles, A., & Rutter, M. (2000) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1005592401947 · Cited by 7,520
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213 · Cited by 5,436
Comorbid psychiatric disorders in children with autism: interview development and rates of disorders
Leyfer, O. T., Folstein, S. E., Bacalman, S., Davis, N. O., Dinh, E., Morgan, J., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Lainhart, J. E. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0123-0 · Cited by 1,637
Anxiety in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders
White, S. W., Oswald, D., Ollendick, T., & Scahill, L. (2009) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.003 · Cited by 1,427
Self-citationConners' rating scales-revised : technical manual
Conners, C. K. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,004
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents with Autistic Spectrum Disorders: A Meta-Analysis
van Steensel, F. J. A., Bögels, S. M., & Perrin, S. (2011) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-011-0097-0 · Cited by 1,463
Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science
Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13534 · Cited by 744
Mazurek, M. O., Vasa, R. A., Kalb, L. G., Kanne, S. M., Rosenberg, D., Keefer, A., Murray, D. S., Freedman, B., & Lowery, L. A. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-012-9668-x · Cited by 419
Mazefsky, C. A., & White, S. W. (2014) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2013.07.002 · Cited by 323
Self-citationWhite, S. W., Ollendick, T. H., Albano, A. M., Oswald, D. P., Johnson, C. R., Southam‐Gerow, M. A., Kim, I., & Scahill, L. D. (2012) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1577-x · Cited by 330
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazefsky, C. A., Kao, J., & Oswald, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mazefsky, C.A.
- Venue
- Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 164-174
- ISSN
- 1878-0237 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-9467
- PMC
- PMC3762501
- OpenAlex
- W2077644735
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Research in Autism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Organization for Autism Research
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD060601, L40 HD051318)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, high-functioning autism, adolescents, psychiatric comorbidity, self-report measures, depression screening, anxiety screening, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale, screening sensitivity and specificity, false positives and false negatives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review