Cited by 70Attachment and Relationship DynamicsAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support Research

Adults and children with Asperger syndrome: Exploring adult attachment style, marital satisfaction and satisfaction with parenthood

Lau, Winnie, Peterson, Candida C.·2011·Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.06.001

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lau, W., & Peterson, C. C.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Candida C.
Venue
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
392-399
ISSN
  • 1878-0237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-9467
OpenAlex
W1986288125
Cited by
70
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in Autism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, romantic attachment styles, marital satisfaction, parents of autistic children, attachment avoidance, autism spectrum disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review