Diagnostic application of oxidation-reduction potential assay for measurement of oxidative stress: Clinical utility in male factor infertility
Open accessAbstract
The objectives of this study were to: (i) describe a protocol measuring the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) by MiOXSYS System as an alternative method of seminal oxidative stress (OS) testing; (ii) establish a reference value for static ORP (sORP) to distinguish between controls and male factor infertility patients; (iii) evaluate intra-observer and inter-observer reliability; and (iv) examine association of sORP with sperm parameters predictive of male factor infertility. Elevated levels of sORP were seen in infertile patients (6.22 ± 1.10 mV/10 6 sperm/ml) compared with controls (1.59 ± 0.29 mV/10 6 sperm/ml) (P = 0.004). A sORP cut-off value 1.36 mV/10 6 sperm/ml identified normal semen and abnormal semen quality with a sensitivity 69.6%, specificity 83.1%, positive predictive value 85.3% and negative predictive value 65.9%. The test demonstrated strong intra-observer (CV 8.39%) and inter-observer reliability (correlations >0.97). Higher sORP levels were associated with poor sperm parameters across the fertility status of subjects. Negative correlations were noted with sperm parameters (concentration, total sperm count, motility and morphology) indicating these male infertility parameters are related to OS. In conclusion, the introduction of ORP as a novel clinical test for assessment of OS will help clinicians to better diagnose and manage male factor infertility patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 6th Edition is lacking recently published evidence indicating the predictive power of seminal OS as determined by means of ORP.
“Unfortunately, this 6th Edition of the WHO manual is lacking recently published evidence indicating the predictive power of seminal OS as determined by means of the ORP [48,57,58,59,60].”
From The Sixth Edition of the WHO Manual for Human Semen Analysis: A Critical Review and SWOT Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Martinez, G., & Daniels, K. (2023) · doi:10.15620/cdc:122080 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Relationship amongst teratozoospermia, seminal oxidative stress and male infertility
Agarwal, A., Tvrda, E., & Sharma, R. (2014) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-12-45 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Agarwal, A., Gupta, S., Sharma, R., 2016c. Oxidation-reduction potential measurement in ejaculated semen samples. In: Agarwal, A., Gupta, S., Sharma, R. (Eds.), Andrological Evaluation of Male Infertility. A Laboratory Guide. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
- O'Flaherty, C., 2014a. The enzymatic antioxidant system of human spermatozoa. Adv. Androl. 2014, Article ID 626374. doi:10.1155/2014/ 626374. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Sixth Edition of the WHO Manual for Human Semen Analysis: A Critical Review and SWOT Analysis
Boitrelle, F., Shah, R., Saleh, R., Henkel, R., Kandil, H., Chung, E., Vogiatzi, P., Zini, A., Arafa, M., & Agarwal, A. (2021) · Life · doi:10.3390/life11121368 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Self-citationGarcia-Segura, S., Ribas-Maynou, J., Lara-Cerrillo, S., Garcia-Peiró, A., Castel, A. B., Benet, J., & Oliver-Bonet, M. (2020) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology9090262 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Cicek, O. S. Y., Kaya, G., Alyuruk, B., Doger, E., Girisen, T., & Filiz, S. (2021) · International braz j urol · doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0751 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Agarwal, A., Roychoudhury, S., Sharma, R., Gupta, S., Majzoub, A., & Sabanegh, E.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Agarwal, Ashok
- Venue
- Reproductive BioMedicine Online
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-57
- ISSN
- 1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2538818743
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14
- FWCI
- 17.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cleveland Clinic
- Department of Biotechnology, Government of India
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Keywords
- redox potential, oxidative stress, male factor infertility, seminal oxidative stress, reference values, observer reliability, semen parameters, sperm motility, sperm morphology, sperm count
- MeSH terms
- Female, Fertility, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Oxidation-Reduction, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Semen, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Case-Control Studies, Oxidative Stress, Area Under Curve, Semen Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review