The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unequal we stand: An empirical analysis of economic inequality in the United States, 1967–2006
Open accessAbstract
We conduct a systematic empirical study of cross-sectional inequality in the United States, integrating data from the Current Population Survey, the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, the Consumer Expenditure Survey, and the Survey of Consumer Finances.In order to understand how different dimensions of inequality are related via choices, markets, and institutions, we follow the mapping suggested by the household budget constraint from individual wages to individual earnings, to household earnings, to disposable income, and, ultimately, to consumption and wealth.We document a continuous and sizable increase in wage inequality over the sample period.Changes in the distribution of hours worked sharpen the rise in earnings inequality before 1982, but mitigate its increase thereafter.Taxes and transfers compress the level of income inequality, especially at the bottom of the distribution, but have little effect on the overall trend.Finally, access to financial markets has limited both the level and growth of consumption inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors
Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118323 · Cited by 4,793
Technical change, inequality, and the labor market
Acemoglu, D. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.40.1.7 · Cited by 1,767
Cited by
Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Kearney, M. S. (2008) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.90.2.300 · Cited by 2,385
Selection, Agriculture, and Cross-Country Productivity Differences
Lagakos, D., & Waugh, M. E. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.2.948 · Cited by 438
CENTRAL BANK POLICIES AND INCOME AND WEALTH INEQUALITY: A SURVEY
Colciago, A., Samarina, A., & de Haan, J. (2019) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12314 · Cited by 284
The Long-Term Distributional and Welfare Effects of Covid-19 School Closures
Fuchs-Schündeln, N., Krueger, D., Ludwig, A., & Popova, I. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w27773 · Cited by 84
Explaining intergenerational mobility: The role of fertility and family transfers
Daruich, D., & Kozlowski, J. (2020) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.red.2019.10.002 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Heathcote, J., Perri, F., & Violante, G. L.
- Venue
- Review of Economic Dynamics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-51
- ISSN
- 1094-2025 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138148571
- Cited by
- 875
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 129.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unequal we stand: An empirical analysis of economic inequality in the United States, 1967–2006. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.red.2009.10.010
- The paper
- Heathcote, J., Perri, F., & Violante, G. L. (2010). Unequal we stand: An empirical analysis of economic inequality in the United States, 1967–2006. Review of Economic Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2009.10.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.