The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison on efficiency of various techniques in treatment of waste and sewage water – A comprehensive review
Open accessAbstract
In the present scenario, environmental laws have become stringent towards health, economy and reduction of pollution. The pollution is a result of discharge of various organic and inorganic substances into the environment. The sources of pollution include domestic agricultural and industrial water. Conventional techniques such as chemical precipitation, carbon adsorption, ion exchange, evaporations and membrane processes are found to be effective in treatment of waste and sewage water. Recently, biological treatments have gained popularity to remove toxic and other harmful substances. The objective of the paper is to make comprehensive review including the performance of each technique in treatment of waste and sewage water. The research directions are also suggested based on the review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review
Babel, S. (2003) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00263-7 · Cited by 3,444
Gupta, V. K., & Rastogi, A. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.104 · Cited by 556
Cited by
Innovations and challenges in adsorption-based wastewater remediation: A comprehensive review
Satyam, S., & Patra, S. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29573 · Cited by 788
Bioremediation of heavy metals by microbial process
Verma, S., & Kuila, A. (2019) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2019.100369 · Cited by 536
Chan, S. S., Khoo, K. S., Chew, K. W., Ling, T. C., & Show, P. L. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126159 · Cited by 422
Tran, H. N., Nguyen, D. T., Le, G. T., Tomul, F., Lima, E. C., Woo, S. H., Sarmah, A. K., Nguyen, H. Q., Nguyen, P. T., Nguyen, D. D., et al. (2019) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.018 · Cited by 268
Aloe vera waste biomass-based adsorbents for the removal of aquatic pollutants: A review
Giannakoudakis, D. A., Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A., Tsafrakidou, P., Triantafyllidis, K. S., Kornaros, M., & Anastopoulos, I. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.064 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Rajasulochana, P., & Preethy, V.
- Venue
- Resource-Efficient Technologies
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 175-184
- ISSN
- 2405-6529 (ISSN-L)
- 2405-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2531299156
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 48.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison on efficiency of various techniques in treatment of waste and sewage water – A comprehensive review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.reffit.2016.09.004
- The paper
- Rajasulochana, P., & Preethy, V. (2016). Comparison on efficiency of various techniques in treatment of waste and sewage water – A comprehensive review. Resource-Efficient Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2016.09.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
