CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide

Krasny-Pacini, Agata, Evans, Jonathan·2018·Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.002

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Graham, 2012, Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: issues and methods, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 93, S111, 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.017 · DOI
  2. Guyatt, 1990, N of 1 randomized trials for investigating new drugs, Control Clin Trials, 11, 88, 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90003-K · DOI
  3. Byiers, 2012, Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice, Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 21, 397, 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036) · DOI
  4. Cohen, 2014, Single-case research design in pediatric psychology: considerations regarding data analysis, J Pediatr Psychol, 39, 124, 10.1093/jpepsy/jst065 · DOI
  5. Lane, 2017, Single-case experimental design: current standards and applications in occupational therapy, Am J Occup Ther, 71, 10.5014/ajot.2017.022210 · DOI
  6. Gorczynski, 2013, The use of single-case experimental research to examine physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness interventions: a review, J Appl Sport Psychol, 25, 148, 10.1080/10413200.2012.664606 · DOI
  7. Haegele, 2015, The applied behavior analysis research paradigm and single-subject designs in adapted physical activity research, Adapt Phys Activ Q, 32, 285, 10.1123/APAQ.2014-0211 · DOI
  8. Dallery, 2013, Single-case experimental designs to evaluate novel technology-based health interventions, J Med Internet Res, 15, e22, 10.2196/jmir.2227 · DOI
  9. Geist, 2014, Single-case design studies in music therapy: resurrecting experimental evidence in small group and individual music therapy clinical settings, J Music Ther, 51, 293, 10.1093/jmt/thu032 · DOI
  10. Evans, 2014, Single-case experimental designs: introduction to a special issue of neuropsychological rehabilitation, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 24, 305, 10.1080/09602011.2014.903198 · DOI
  11. Normand, 2016, Less is more: psychologists can learn more by studying fewer people, Front Psychol [Internet], 7
  12. Romeiser-Logan, 2017, Single-subject research designs in pediatric rehabilitation: a valuable step towards knowledge translation, Dev Med Child Neurol [Internet], 10.1111/dmcn.13405 · DOI
  13. Perdices, 2009, Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: are they unrecognised and undervalued?, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 19, 904, 10.1080/09602010903040691 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Johnston, 2010, Single-subject designs: current methodologies and future directions, Occup Participation Health, 30, 4, 10.3928/15394492-20091214-02 · DOI
  15. Gharebaghy, 2015, Effect of cognitive intervention on children with ADHD, Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 35, 13, 10.3109/01942638.2014.957428 · DOI
  16. Nikles, 2014, Aggregated n-of-1 trials of central nervous system stimulants versus placebo for paediatric traumatic brain injury – a pilot study, Trials, 15, 1, 10.1186/1745-6215-15-54 · DOI
  17. McKerracher, 2005, A single-case experimental design comparing two memory notebook formats for a man with memory problems caused by traumatic brain injury, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 15, 115, 10.1080/09602010443000056 · DOI
  18. Tate, 2016, The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: explanation and elaboration, Arch Sci Psychol, 4, 10
  19. Coker, 2009, The effects of constraint-induced movement therapy for a child less than one year of age, Neurorehabil, 24, 199, 10.3233/NRE-2009-0469 · DOI
  20. Mattacola, 1997, Effects of a 6-week strength and proprioception training program on measures of dynamic balance: a single-case design, J Athl Train, 32, 127
  21. Kirsch, 2004, Web-based assistive technology interventions for cognitive impairments after traumatic brain injury: a selective review and two case studies, Rehabil Psychol, 49, 200, 10.1037/0090-5550.49.3.200 · DOI
  22. Blyth, 2017, Ultrasound in dysphagia rehabilitation: a novel approach following partial glossectomy, Disabil Rehabil, 39, 2215, 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219400 · DOI
  23. Raymer, 2007, Semantic-phonologic treatment for noun and verb retrieval impairments in aphasia, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 17, 244, 10.1080/09602010600814661 · DOI
  24. Ten Berge, 2012, A systematic evaluation of the effect of thumb opponens splints on hand function in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy, Clin Rehabil, 26, 362, 10.1177/0269215511411936 · DOI
  25. Ouellet, 2007, Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia associated with traumatic brain injury: a single-case experimental design, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88, 1581, 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.006 · DOI
  26. Sunderland, 2006, Action errors and dressing disability after stroke: an ecological approach to neuropsychological assessment and intervention, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 16, 666, 10.1080/09602010500204385 · DOI
  27. Baldwin, 2015, Google calendar: a single-case experimental design study of a man with severe memory problems, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 25, 617, 10.1080/09602011.2014.956764 · DOI
  28. Logan, 1998, The impact of typical peers on the perceived happiness of students with profound multiple disabilities, Research and practice for persons with severe disabilities., 23, 309
  29. Chang, 2011, A location-based prompting system to transition autonomously through vocational tasks for individuals with cognitive impairments, Res Dev Disabil, 32, 2669, 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.006 · DOI
  30. Hoogeboom, 2012, Feasibility and potential effectiveness of a non-pharmacological multidisciplinary care programme for persons with generalised osteoarthritis: a randomised, multiple baseline single-case study, BMJ Open, 2, e001161, 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001161 · DOI
  31. Svoboda, 2012, PDA and smartphone use by individuals with moderate-to-severe memory impairment: application of a theory-driven training programme, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 22, 408, 10.1080/09602011.2011.652498 · DOI
  32. Ferland, 2013, Errorless (re)learning of daily living routines by a woman with impaired memory and initiation: transferable to a new home?, Brain Inj, 27, 1461, 10.3109/02699052.2013.823661 · DOI
  33. Krasny-Pacini, 2014, Context-sensitive goal management training for everyday executive dysfunction in children after severe traumatic brain injury, J Head Trauma Rehabil, 29, E49, 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000015 · DOI
  34. Ducharme, 2002, Treatment of oppositional behavior in children of parents with brain injury and chronic pain, J Emotional Behav Disord, 10, 241, 10.1177/10634266020100040601 · DOI
  35. Lui, 2012, Development and evaluation of a dual-output vocal cord vibration switch for persons with multiple disabilities, Disabil Rehabil Assistive Technol, 7, 82, 10.3109/17483107.2011.557467 · DOI
  36. Feeney, 2010, Structured flexibility: the use of context-sensitive self-regulatory scripts to support young persons with acquired brain injury and behavioral difficulties, J Head Trauma Rehabil, 25, 416, 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181fbc0a2 · DOI
  37. Cosbey, 2017, EAT-UP™ Family-centered feeding intervention to promote food acceptance and decrease challenging behaviors: a single-case experimental design replicated across three families of children with autism spectrum disorder, J Autism Dev Disord, 47, 564, 10.1007/s10803-016-2977-0 · DOI
  38. Diamond, 1990, Effect of a tone-inhibiting dynamic ankle-foot orthosis on stride characteristics of an adult with hemiparesis, Phys Ther, 70, 423, 10.1093/ptj/70.7.423 · DOI
  39. Tunnard, 2014, Comparison of neuropsychological rehabilitation techniques for unilateral neglect: an ABACADAEAF single-case experimental design, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 24, 382, 10.1080/09602011.2013.872041 · DOI
  40. Sumitani, 2007, Prism adaptation to optical deviation alleviates pathologic pain, Neurology, 68, 128, 10.1212/01.wnl.0000250242.99683.57 · DOI
  41. Nikles, 2017, A series of n-of-1 trials of stimulants in brain injured children, NeuroRehabilitation, 40, 11, 10.3233/NRE-161386 · DOI
  42. Naganuma, 1988, Effect of hand splints on stereotypic hand behavior of three girls with Rett syndrome, Phys Ther, 68, 664, 10.1093/ptj/68.5.664 · DOI
  43. Carey, 2005, Training of somatosensory discrimination after stroke: facilitation of stimulus generalization, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 84, 428, 10.1097/01.PHM.0000159971.12096.7F · DOI
  44. Boman, 2010, Support in everyday activities with a home-based electronic memory aid for persons with memory impairments, Disabil Rehabil Assistive Technol, 5, 339, 10.3109/17483100903131777 · DOI
  45. Arco, 2008, Neurobehavioural treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in an adult with traumatic brain injury, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 18, 109, 10.1080/09602010701656706 · DOI
  46. Tate, 2017, The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 27, 1, 10.1080/09602011.2016.1190533 · DOI
  47. Ferron, 2006, Tests for the visual analysis of response-guided multiple baseline data, J Exp Educ, 75, 66, 10.3200/JEXE.75.1.66-81 · DOI
  48. Levin, 2016, Comparison of randomization test procedures for single-case multiple baseline designs, Dev Neurorehabil, 1–21
  49. Ferron, 2003, The functioning of single-case randomization tests with and without random assignment, J Exp Educ, 71, 267, 10.1080/00220970309602066 · DOI
  50. Kratochwill, 2010, Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: randomization to the rescue, Psychol Meth, 15, 124, 10.1037/a0017736 · DOI
  51. Lane, 2007, Describing baseline conditions: suggestions for study reports, J Behav Educ, 16, 224, 10.1007/s10864-006-9036-4 · DOI
  52. Borrelli, 2011, The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials, J Public Health Dentistry, 71, S52, 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x · DOI · Paper page
  53. Borrelli, 2005, A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research, J Consult Clin Psychol, 73, 852, 10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.852 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Hart, 2009, Treatment definition in complex rehabilitation interventions, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 19, 824, 10.1080/09602010902995945 · DOI
  55. Ledford, 2014, Measuring procedural fidelity in behavioural research, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 24, 332, 10.1080/09602011.2013.861352 · DOI
  56. Spillane, 2007, Monitoring treatment fidelity in a randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention, J Adv Nurs, 60, 343, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04386.x · DOI · Paper page
  57. Vohra, 2015, CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 statement, BMJ, 350, h1738, 10.1136/bmj.h1738 · DOI
  58. Shamseer, 2015, CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration, BMJ, 350, h1793, 10.1136/bmj.h1793 · DOI
  59. Lane, 2014, Visual analysis in single-case experimental design studies: brief review and guidelines, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 24, 445, 10.1080/09602011.2013.815636 · DOI
  60. Pfadt, 1995, Using statistical process control to make data-based clinical decisions, J Appl Behav Anal, 28, 349, 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-349 · DOI
  61. Tarlow, 2017, An improved rank correlation effect size statistic for single-case designs: baseline-corrected Tau, Behav Modif, 41, 427, 10.1177/0145445516676750 · DOI
  62. Wolfe, 2015, A comparison of two approaches to training visual analysis of AB graphs, J Appl Behav Anal, 48, 472, 10.1002/jaba.212 · DOI
  63. Lanovaz, 2017, Using the dual-criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: an analysis of nonsimulated data, J Appl Behav Anal, 50, 662, 10.1002/jaba.394 · DOI
  64. Young, 2016, An evaluation of prompting and reinforcement for training visual analysis skills, J Behav Educ, 25, 95, 10.1007/s10864-015-9234-z · DOI
  65. Manolov, 2014, Single-case experimental designs: reflections on conduct and analysis, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 24, 634, 10.1080/09602011.2014.903199 · DOI
  66. Manolov, 2017, How can single-case data be analyzed? Software resources, tutorial, and reflections on analysis, Behav Modif, 41, 179, 10.1177/0145445516664307 · DOI
  67. Manolov, 2017, Recommendations for choosing single-case data analytical techniques, Behav Ther, 48, 97, 10.1016/j.beth.2016.04.008 · DOI
  68. Shadish, 2011, Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008, Behav Res Meth, 43, 971, 10.3758/s13428-011-0111-y · DOI
  69. Ferreira, 2016, Espresso coffee for the treatment of somnolence in Parkinson's disease: results of n-of-1 trials, Front Neurol [Internet], 7
  70. Shelton, 2014, Evidence-based public health: not only whether it works, but how it can be made to work practicably at scale, Global Health Sci Pract, 2, 253, 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00066 · DOI
  71. Feeney, 2008, Context-sensitive cognitive-behavioral supports for young children with TBI: a second replication study, J Positive Behav Interv, 10, 115, 10.1177/1098300707312540 · DOI
  72. Feeney, 2006, Context-sensitive cognitive-behavioural supports for young children with TBI: a replication study, Brain Inj, 20, 629, 10.1080/02699050600744194 · DOI
  73. Feeney, 2003, Context-sensitive behavioral supports for young children with TBI: short-term effects and long-term outcome, J Head Trauma Rehabil, 18, 33, 10.1097/00001199-200301000-00006 · DOI
  74. Moss, 2006, Language rehabilitation in chronic aphasia and time postonset: a review of single-subject data, Stroke, 37, 3043, 10.1161/01.STR.0000249427.74970.15 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Wehmeyer, 2006, Technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to support employment activities: a single-subject design meta-analysis, J Vocational Rehabil, 24, 81, 10.3233/JVR-2006-00318 · DOI
  76. Heinicke, 2014, Applied behavior analysis in acquired brain injury rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of single-case design intervention research: applied behavior analysis in ABI, Behav Interv, 29, 77, 10.1002/bin.1380 · DOI
  77. Goh, 2012, Individualized positive behavior support in school settings a meta-analysis, Remedial Spec Educ, 33, 271, 10.1177/0741932510383990 · DOI
  78. Maggin, 2011, A systematic evaluation of token economies as a classroom management tool for students with challenging behavior, J School Psychol, 49, 529, 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.05.001 · DOI
  79. Romeiser-Logan, 2008, Single-subject research design: recommendations for levels of evidence and quality rating, Dev Med Child Neurol, 50, 99, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.02005.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Krasny-Pacini, A., & Evans, J.
Venue
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
164-179
ISSN
1877-0657
DOI
10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.002
Cited by
373
References
15
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review