Cited by 92Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and FertilityAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Thecal Cell Sensitivity to Luteinizing Hormone and Insulin in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

Open access
Cadagan, David, Khan, Raheela, Amer, Saad·2016·Reproductive Biology

Abstract

This study examined whether a defect of steroid synthesis in ovarian theca cells may lead to the development of PCOS, through contributions to excess androgen secretion. Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is one of the leading causes of infertility worldwide affecting around 1 in 10 of women of a reproductive age. One of the fundamental abnormalities in this syndrome is the presence of hormonal irregularities, including hyperandrogenemia, hyperinsulinemia and hypersecretion of luteinizing hormone (LH). Studies suggest that insulin treatment increases progesterone and androstenedione secretion in PCOS theca cells when compared to insulin treated normal theca cells. Furthermore the augmented effects of LH and insulin have been seen to increase ovarian androgen synthesis in non-PCOS theca cultures whilst also increasing the expression of steroidogenic enzymes specific to the PI3-K pathway. Our examination of primary thecal cultures showed an increase in both the expression of the steroidogenic enzyme CYP17 and androgen secretion in PCOS theca cells under basal conditions, when compared to non-PCOS cells. This was increased significantly under treatments of LH and insulin combined. Our results support the previous reported hypothesis that a dysfunction may exist within the PI3-K pathway. Specifically, that sensitivity exists to physiological symptoms including hyperinsulinemia and hyper secretion of LH found in PCOS through co-stimulation. The impact of these findings may allow the development of a therapeutic target in PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.repbio.2015.12.006

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cadagan, D., Khan, R., & Amer, S.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Cadagan, David
Venue
Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
53-60
ISSN
1642-431X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2292109795
Cited by
92
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, theca cells, luteinizing hormone, insulin, androgen production, CYP17, PI3K signaling, steroidogenesis, hyperandrogenemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, androstenedione, progesterone
MeSH terms
Adult, Androstenedione, Cells, Cultured, Female, Humans, Insulin, Luteinizing Hormone, Middle Aged, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase, Theca Cells, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review