Cited by 50Sperm and Testicular FunctionHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Aluminum content of human semen: Implications for semen quality

Klein, J.P., Mold, M., Mery, L., Cottier, M., Exley, C.·2014·Reproductive Toxicology

Abstract

A deterioration of human semen quality has been observed over recent decades. A possible explanation could be an increased exposure to environmental pollutants, including aluminum. Our aim was to measure the aluminum concentration in the semen of 62 patients and to carry out a preliminary evaluation on its impact on specific semen parameters. For each patient, semen analyses were performed according to WHO guidelines. A graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry method was used to determine semen aluminum concentration. A cytological analysis using an aluminum-specific fluor, lumogallion, was also performed. The mean aluminum concentration in human semen was 339 μg/L. Patients with oligozoospermia had a statistically higher aluminum concentration than others. No significant difference was observed for other semen parameters. Cytological analysis showed the presence of aluminum in spermatozoa. This study provided unequivocal evidence of high concentrations of aluminum in human semen and suggested possible implications for spermatogenesis and sperm count.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.10.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human semen and spermatozoa contain Al and patients with oligospermia had higher Al concentration than healthy individuals.

    “Human semen and spermatozoa contain Al and patients with oligospermia had higher Al concentration than healthy individuals (Klein et al., 2014).”

    From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2014

  • Human reproduction may be affected negatively by Al exposure.

    “Human reproduction may be affected negatively by Al exposure (Klein et al., 2014; Mouro et al., 2017).”

    From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, J. P., Mold, M., Mery, L., Cottier, M., & Exley, C.
Affiliations
  • Université de Lyon (FR)
  • Keele University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Klein, J.P.
  • Exley, C.
Venue
Reproductive Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
50
Pages
43-48
ISSN
0890-6238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062209576
Cited by
50
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Keele University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
aluminum, semen, semen quality, oligozoospermia, spermatozoa, environmental pollutants, spermatogenesis, sperm count, lumogallion, cytological examination
MeSH terms
Adult, Aluminum, Humans, Male, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Oligospermia, Semen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review