CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States

Kahhat, Ramzy, Kim, Junbeum, Xu, Ming, Allenby, Braden, Williams, Eric, Zhang, Peng·2008·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.03.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.03.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • Does WEEE recycling make sense from an environmental perspective?

    Hischier, R., Wäger, P., & Gauglhofer, J. (2005) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.003 · Cited by 301 · cited 2×

    “…two different e-waste systems: Swiss Association for Information, Communication and Organization Technology (SWICO) for office, dental, graphic and telecommunication equipment and Swiss Foundation for Waste Management (SENS) for household appliances (Hischier et al., 2005; Streicher-Porte, 2005).”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Allenby B. Earth systems engineering and management. IEEE Technol Soc Mag (Winter 2000–2001) 2000;19(4):10–24. · DOI
  2. Cui, 2003, Mechanical recycling of waste electric and electronic equipment: a review, J Hazard Mater, 99, 243, 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00061-X · DOI
  3. Deng, 2006, Atmospheric levels and cytotoxicity of PAHs and heavy metals in TSP and PM2.5 at an electronic waste recycling site in southeast China, Atmos Environ, 40, 6945, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.032 · DOI
  4. Gibson, 2006, Electronics waste management and disposal issues and alternatives, Environ Claims J, 18, 321, 10.1080/10406020600880592 · DOI
  5. Greenpeace. Recycling of electronic wastes in China and India: workplace and environmental contamination. Exeter, UK. Technical note 09/2005 (Section 1); 2005. http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/china/en/press/reports/recycling-of-electronic-wastes.pdf (accessed March 2007).
  6. Huo, 2007, Elevated blood lead levels of children in Guiyu, an electronic waste recycling town in China, Environ Health Perspect, 115, 1113, 10.1289/ehp.9697 · DOI
  7. Jang, 2003, Leaching of lead from computer printed wire boards and cathode ray tubes by municipal solid waste landfill leachates, Environ Sci Technol, 37, 4778, 10.1021/es034155t · DOI
  8. Jody, 2006, End-of-life vehicle recycling: the state of the art of resource recovery from shredder residue. Energy systems division, Argonne Natl Lab
  9. Kang, 2005, Electronic waste recycling: a review of U.S. infrastructure and technology options, Resour Conserv Recycl, 45, 368, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.06.001 · DOI
  10. Keller M. Assessment of gold recovery processes in Bangalore, India and evaluation of an alternative recycling path for printed wiring boards: a case study. Diploma Thesis at the Institute for Spatial and Landscape Planning, Regional Resource Management at the ETH Zurich; October 2006.
  11. Leung, 2007, Spatial distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in soil and combusted residue at Guiyu, an electronic waste recycling site in Southeast China, Environ Sci Technol, 41, 2730, 10.1021/es0625935 · DOI
  12. Li, 2007, Severe PCDD/F and PBDD/F pollution in air around an electronic waste dismantling area in China, Environ Sci Technol, 41, 5641, 10.1021/es0702925 · DOI
  13. Lincoln, 2007, Leaching assessments of hazardous materials in cellular telephones, Environ Sci Technol, 41, 2572, 10.1021/es0610479 · DOI
  14. Liu, 2006, Electrical and electronic waste management in China: progress and the barriers to overcome, Waste Manage Res, 24, 92, 10.1177/0734242X06062499 · DOI
  15. Musson, 2006, RCRA toxicity characterization of discarded electronic devices, Environ Sci Technol, 40, 2721, 10.1021/es051557n · DOI
  16. Sodhi, 2001, Models for recycling electronics end-of-life products, OR Spectrum, 23, 97, 10.1007/PL00013347 · DOI
  17. Streicher-Porte, 2005, Key drivers of the e-waste recycling system: assessing and modeling e-waste processing in the informal sector in Delhi, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 25, 472, 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.004 · DOI
  18. Terazono, 2006, Current status and research on e-waste issues in Asia, J Mater Cycles Waste Manage, 8, 1, 10.1007/s10163-005-0147-0 · DOI
  19. Vann, 2006, Factors affecting TCLP lead leachability from computer CPUs, Waste Manage, 26, 293, 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.06.016 · DOI
  20. Widmer, 2005, Global perspectives on e-waste, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 25, 436, 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.001 · DOI
  21. Wong, 2007, Evidence of excessive releases of metals from primitive e-waste processing in Guiyu, China, Environ Pollut, 148, 62, 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.11.006 · DOI
  22. Wong, 2007, Trace metal contamination of sediments in an e-waste processing village in China, Environ Pollut, 145, 434, 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.05.017 · DOI
  23. Yang, 1993, Environmental threats of discarded picture tubes and printed circuit boards, J Hazard Mater, 34, 235, 10.1016/0304-3894(93)85008-3 · DOI
  24. Yu, 2006, Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils at Guiyu area of China, affected by recycling of electronic waste using primitive technologies, Chemosphere, 65, 1500, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kahhat, R., Kim, J., Xu, M., Allenby, B., Williams, E., & Zhang, P.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
955-964
ISSN
0921-3449
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.03.002
Cited by
350
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review