The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic literature review on the circular economy initiatives in the European Union
Abstract
Abstract The circular economy (CE) paradigm fosters to rethink and redesign the manufacturing process, usage and disposal pattern of products and services in an economy. In the past few years, CE has gained tremendous momentum in terms of research and implementation. Apart from the widening horizon of CE across the globe, numerous practitioners, policy-makers and academicians have explored the scope to incorporate various sectors of industries and businesses within the CE model. Evidently, a primary mechanism or system is required to facilitate the transition to CE. With an aim to understand this mechanism, the article analyzes, through a systematic literature review, the implementation of circular practices across the European Union (EU) member states based on a framework of circular strategies, nutrient cycles, ReSOLVE framework and circular business models. Further, the implementation of CE action plan proposed in 2015 for the EU region, has facilitated circular practices in numerous industries, owing to government policies and regulations. Additionally, it has helped in building the required infrastructure, while providing a technological push for augmenting sustainable growth in the region. Based on the analysis, it is inferred that recycling has been the most widely used circular strategy for looping back materials into the system. Waste management, electrical and electronic equipment industries and construction industries are a pioneer in CE implementation. Also, macro level initiatives by governments and/or regional administrative bodies predominate CE's implementation in the EU. A further transition to CE can be facilitated by government policies, infrastructure and technological availability, awareness, stakeholder collaboration and supply-chain integration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x · Cited by 10,817
The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · Cited by 9,360
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Circular economy—From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools
Kalmykova, Y., Sadagopan, M., & Rosado, L. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034 · Cited by 1,412
How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review
Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · Cited by 1,358
Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055 · Cited by 1,169
Exploring How Usage-Focused Business Models Enable Circular Economy through Digital Technologies
Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10030639 · Cited by 666
A Conceptual Framework for Circular Design
Moreno, M., De los Rios, C., Rowe, Z., & Charnley, F. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8090937 · Cited by 564
Cited by
Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review
Charef, R., Morel, J.-C., & Rakhshan, K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132312989 · Cited by 188
Rahla, K. M., Mateus, R., & Bragança, L. (2021) · Infrastructures · doi:10.3390/infrastructures6040049 · Cited by 99
Gasparri, E., Arasteh, S., Kuru, A., Stracchi, P., & Brambilla, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Built Environment · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1239757 · Cited by 79
Circular Economy: A Review of Review Articles
Hossain, M., Park, S., Suchek, N., & Pansera, M. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3867 · Cited by 77
Smoothing the circular economy transition: The role of resources and capabilities enablers
Seles, B. M. R. P., Mascarenhas, J., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., & Trevisan, A. H. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2985 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Mhatre, P., Panchal, R., Singh, A., & Bibyan, S.
- Venue
- Sustainable Production and Consumption
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 187-202
- ISSN
- 2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3088861978
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic literature review on the circular economy initiatives in the European Union. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.008
- The paper
- Mhatre, P., Panchal, R., Singh, A., & Bibyan, S. (2021). A systematic literature review on the circular economy initiatives in the European Union. Sustainable Production and Consumption. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.