Waste of fresh fruit and vegetables at retailers in Sweden – Measuring and calculation of mass, economic cost and climate impact
Open accessAbstract
Food waste is a significant problem for environmental, economic and food security reasons. The retailer, food service and consumers have been recognised as the parts of the food supply chain where the possibility of reducing food waste is greatest in industrialised countries. In this study, primary data on fresh fruit and vegetables (FFV) waste collected through direct measurements in three large retail stores in Sweden were analysed from the perspectives of wasted mass, economic cost and climate impact. A method of measuring and calculating the economic cost of FFV waste was developed and includes the cost of wasted produce, the cost of personnel time for waste management and the cost of waste collection and disposal. The results show that seven FFV categories, which have been termed “hotspot categories”, contributed to the majority of the waste, both in terms of wasted mass, economic cost and climate impact. The “hotspot categories” are apple, banana, grape, lettuce, pear, sweet pepper, and tomato. The cost benefit analysis conducted showed that it is economically wise to invest in more working time for employees in waste management to accomplish a reduction of wasted mass and climate impact without an economic loss for the store. These results are relevant for supporting the implementation of policies and initiatives aimed at food waste reduction at retail level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bananas are the most wasted fruit due to brown markings or slight bruising in stores, according to a study from Sweden.
“Bananas are the most wasted fruit due to brown markings or slight bruising in stores, according to a study from Sweden [14].”
From Valorization of Fruit Waste for Bioactive Compounds and Their Applications in the Food Industry (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0126 · Cited by 3,197 · see citing works
Missing food, missing data? A critical review of global food losses and food waste data
Xue, L., Liu, G., Parfitt, J., Liu, X., Van Herpen, E., Stenmarck, Å., O’Connor, C., Östergren, K., & Cheng, S. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00401 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Priefer, C., Jörissen, J., & Bräutigam, K.-R. (2016) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.004 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Lebersorger, S., & Schneider, F. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.06.013 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Eriksson, M., Strid, I., & Hansson, P.-A. (2012) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.001 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Initiatives on prevention of food waste in the retail and wholesale trades
Hanssen, O. J., Stenmarck, Å., Werge, M., Silvennoinen, K., & Katajajuuri, J.-M. (2011) · TemaNord · doi:10.6027/tn2011-548 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Valorization of Fruit Waste for Bioactive Compounds and Their Applications in the Food Industry
Nirmal, N., Khanashyam, A., Mundanat, A., Shah, K., Babu, K., Thorakkattu, P., Al-Asmari, F., & Pandiselvam, R. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12030556 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
“Bananas are the most wasted fruit due to brown markings or slight bruising in stores, according to a study from Sweden [14].”
- Authors
- Mattsson, L., Williams, H., & Berghel, J.
- Affiliations
- Karlstad University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Mattsson, Lisa
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 118-126
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2774952564
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- BillerudKorsnäs AB
- Swedish Knowledge Foundation (KK-stiftelsen), Sweden
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
- Keywords
- food waste, fresh produce, retail food waste, climate change impacts, waste management, cost-benefit analysis, food waste reduction, waste measurement, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review