Cited by 84Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactWaste Management and Recycling

Waste of fresh fruit and vegetables at retailers in Sweden – Measuring and calculation of mass, economic cost and climate impact

Open access
Mattsson, Lisa, Williams, Helén, Berghel, Jonas·2018·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

Food waste is a significant problem for environmental, economic and food security reasons. The retailer, food service and consumers have been recognised as the parts of the food supply chain where the possibility of reducing food waste is greatest in industrialised countries. In this study, primary data on fresh fruit and vegetables (FFV) waste collected through direct measurements in three large retail stores in Sweden were analysed from the perspectives of wasted mass, economic cost and climate impact. A method of measuring and calculating the economic cost of FFV waste was developed and includes the cost of wasted produce, the cost of personnel time for waste management and the cost of waste collection and disposal. The results show that seven FFV categories, which have been termed “hotspot categories”, contributed to the majority of the waste, both in terms of wasted mass, economic cost and climate impact. The “hotspot categories” are apple, banana, grape, lettuce, pear, sweet pepper, and tomato. The cost benefit analysis conducted showed that it is economically wise to invest in more working time for employees in waste management to accomplish a reduction of wasted mass and climate impact without an economic loss for the store. These results are relevant for supporting the implementation of policies and initiatives aimed at food waste reduction at retail level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.037

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattsson, L., Williams, H., & Berghel, J.
Affiliations
Karlstad University (SE)
Corresponding author
Mattsson, Lisa
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
130
Pages
118-126
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774952564
Cited by
84
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • BillerudKorsnäs AB
  • Swedish Knowledge Foundation (KK-stiftelsen), Sweden
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
food waste, fresh produce, retail food waste, climate change impacts, waste management, cost-benefit analysis, food waste reduction, waste measurement, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review