Cited by 179Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Food losses in six Swedish retail stores: Wastage of fruit and vegetables in relation to quantities delivered

Eriksson, Mattias, Strid, Ingrid, Hansson, Per-Anders·2012·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.001

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eriksson et al. estimated that in six Swedish retail stores, fruit and vegetables wasted in relation to quantities delivered was 4.3 percent by mass.

    “Meanwhile Eriksson et al. [31] estimated that in six Swedish retail stores, fruit and vegetables wasted in relation to quantities delivered was 4.3 percent by mass.”
  • The estimates presented here are much higher than 4.3 percent of fruits and vegetables by mass reported in Eriksson et al. [31] in six Swedish retail stores and slightly higher than the 2005-2006 estimates in Buzby et al. [8].

    “The estimates presented here are much higher than 4.3 percent of fruits and vegetables by mass reported in Eriksson et al. [31] in six Swedish retail stores and slightly higher than the 2005-2006 estimates in Buzby et al. [8].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eriksson, M., Strid, I., & Hansson, P.-A.
Affiliations
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Corresponding author
Eriksson, Mattias
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
68
Pages
14-20
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000772800
Cited by
179
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
  • Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
retail food waste, waste streams, food loss, product rejection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review