Cited by 501Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: a mass flow analysis

Open access
Caldeira, Carla, De Laurentiis, Valeria, Corrado, Sara, van Holsteijn, Freija, Sala, Serenella·2019·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

In 2015, the United Nations defined the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), which include a target (12.3) on food waste. The target requires "by 2030, to halve per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels and to reduce food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses". The target has increased awareness about the food waste problem and boosted research in food waste quantification. Nevertheless, there is a lack of studies that adopt a systematic approach to account for food waste providing disaggregated values per food supply chain stage and per food groups. Such an approach could support policy makers in prioritizing interventions for food waste reduction. To fill this gap, this paper presents a high-level top-down approach to food waste accounting in the European Union. The study aims to support the understanding of the mass flows associated with food production, consumption, and waste, addressing different food groups along the food supply chain. The method for accountin is the mass flow analysis. According to the results, cereals, fruit, and vegetables as the food groups are responsible for the highest amount of food waste, and the consumption stage to be responsible for the largest share of food waste for most food groups. This work highlights the need for further primary research on food waste generation in the EU. Ultimately, this would allow to robustly estimate the food waste generated at EU level, and establishing a more accurate baseline to track the progress towards SDG target 12.3.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.011

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Alexander P. Brown C. Arneth A. Finnigan J. Moran D. Rounsevell M.D. Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system Agric. Syst. 153 2017 190 200 28579671 PMC5437836
  2. Allesch A. Brunner P.H. Material flow analysis as a decision support tool for waste management: a literature review J. Ind. Ecol. 19 2015 753 764
  3. Beretta C. Stoessel F. Baier U. Hellweg S. Quantifying food losses and the potential for reduction in Switzerland Waste Manag. 33 2013 764 773 23270687
  4. Betz A. Buchli J. Göbel C. Müller C. Food waste in the Swiss food service industry - Magnitude and potential for reduction Waste Manag. 35 2015 218 226 25305683
  5. Bräutigam K.R. Jörissen J. Priefer C. The extent of food waste generation across EU-27: different calculation methods and the reliability of their results Waste Manag. Res. 32 2014 683 694 25161274
  6. Corrado S. Caldeira C. Eriksson M. Hanssen O. Hauser H. Liu G. Östergren K. Parry A. Secondi L. Stenmarck Å. Sala S. Food waste accounting: methodologies, challenges and opportunities Glob. Food Sec. 20 2019 93 100 31008044 PMC6472538
  7. Corrado S. Sala S. Food waste accounting along food supply chains: state of the art and outlook Waste Manag. 79 2018 120 131 30343738 PMC6202438
  8. FAO Food Wastage Footprint. Impacts on Natural Resources. Summary Report https://doi.org/ISBN 978-92-5-107752-8 2013
  9. Foley J.A. Ramankutty N. Brauman K.A. Cassidy E.S. Gerber J.S. Johnston M. Mueller N.D. O’Connell C. Ray D.K. West P.C. Balzer C. Bennet E.M. Carpenter S.R. Hill J. Monfreda C. Polasky S. Rockström J. Sheehan J. Siebert S. Tilman D. Zaks D.P.M. Solutions for a cultivated planet Nature 478 2011 337 342 21993620
  10. Hamby A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models Environ. Monit. Assess. 32 1994 135 154 24214086
  11. Hartikainen H. Mogensen L. Svanes E. Franke U. Food waste quantification in primary production – the Nordic countries as a case study Waste Manag. 71 2018 502 511 29100923
  12. Kemna R. van Holsteijn F. Lee P. Sims E. Optimal Food Storage Conditions in Refrigeration Appliances. Preparatory/review Study on Commission Regulation (EC) No. 643/2009 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 1060/2010 – Complementary Research on Optimal Food Storage Conditions in Refriger 2017
  13. Leclercq C. Arcella D. Piccinelli R. Sette S. Le Donne C. The italian national food consumption survey INRAN-SCAI 2005-06: main results in terms of food consumption Public Health Nutr. 12 2009 2504 2532 19278564
  14. Moriguchi Y. Hashimoto S. Material flow analysis and waste management Clift R. Druckman A. Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology 2016 Springer Cham
  15. Pearson A.M. Dutson T.R.. Inedible Meat By-products 2013 Springer Science & Business Media. Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caldeira, C., De Laurentiis, V., Corrado, S., van Holsteijn, F., & Sala, S.
Affiliations
European Commission (BE)
Corresponding author
Sala, Serenella
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
149
Pages
479-488
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955686654
Cited by
501
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 26
FWCI
31.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Joint Research Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
food waste, food supply chain, mass flow analysis, food groups, Sustainable Development Goal 12.3, food waste reduction, cereals, fruits and vegetables, European Union, top-down approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review