Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: a mass flow analysis
Open accessAbstract
In 2015, the United Nations defined the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), which include a target (12.3) on food waste. The target requires "by 2030, to halve per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels and to reduce food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses". The target has increased awareness about the food waste problem and boosted research in food waste quantification. Nevertheless, there is a lack of studies that adopt a systematic approach to account for food waste providing disaggregated values per food supply chain stage and per food groups. Such an approach could support policy makers in prioritizing interventions for food waste reduction. To fill this gap, this paper presents a high-level top-down approach to food waste accounting in the European Union. The study aims to support the understanding of the mass flows associated with food production, consumption, and waste, addressing different food groups along the food supply chain. The method for accountin is the mass flow analysis. According to the results, cereals, fruit, and vegetables as the food groups are responsible for the highest amount of food waste, and the consumption stage to be responsible for the largest share of food waste for most food groups. This work highlights the need for further primary research on food waste generation in the EU. Ultimately, this would allow to robustly estimate the food waste generated at EU level, and establishing a more accurate baseline to track the progress towards SDG target 12.3.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943 · see citing works
Missing food, missing data? A critical review of global food losses and food waste data
Xue, L., Liu, G., Parfitt, J., Liu, X., Van Herpen, E., Stenmarck, Å., O’Connor, C., Östergren, K., & Cheng, S. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00401 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Quantifying household waste of fresh fruit and vegetables in the EU
De Laurentiis, V., Corrado, S., & Sala, S. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.001 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Causes of waste across multi-tier supply networks: Cases in the UK food sector
Mena, C., Terry, L. A., Williams, A., & Ellram, L. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.03.012 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Porter, S. D., Reay, D. S., Higgins, P., & Bomberg, E. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.041 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Willersinn, C., Mack, G., Mouron, P., Keiser, A., & Siegrist, M. (2015) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.033 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Alexander P. Brown C. Arneth A. Finnigan J. Moran D. Rounsevell M.D. Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system Agric. Syst. 153 2017 190 200 28579671 PMC5437836
- Allesch A. Brunner P.H. Material flow analysis as a decision support tool for waste management: a literature review J. Ind. Ecol. 19 2015 753 764
- Beretta C. Stoessel F. Baier U. Hellweg S. Quantifying food losses and the potential for reduction in Switzerland Waste Manag. 33 2013 764 773 23270687
- Betz A. Buchli J. Göbel C. Müller C. Food waste in the Swiss food service industry - Magnitude and potential for reduction Waste Manag. 35 2015 218 226 25305683
- Bräutigam K.R. Jörissen J. Priefer C. The extent of food waste generation across EU-27: different calculation methods and the reliability of their results Waste Manag. Res. 32 2014 683 694 25161274
- Corrado S. Caldeira C. Eriksson M. Hanssen O. Hauser H. Liu G. Östergren K. Parry A. Secondi L. Stenmarck Å. Sala S. Food waste accounting: methodologies, challenges and opportunities Glob. Food Sec. 20 2019 93 100 31008044 PMC6472538
- Corrado S. Sala S. Food waste accounting along food supply chains: state of the art and outlook Waste Manag. 79 2018 120 131 30343738 PMC6202438
- FAO Food Wastage Footprint. Impacts on Natural Resources. Summary Report https://doi.org/ISBN 978-92-5-107752-8 2013
- Foley J.A. Ramankutty N. Brauman K.A. Cassidy E.S. Gerber J.S. Johnston M. Mueller N.D. O’Connell C. Ray D.K. West P.C. Balzer C. Bennet E.M. Carpenter S.R. Hill J. Monfreda C. Polasky S. Rockström J. Sheehan J. Siebert S. Tilman D. Zaks D.P.M. Solutions for a cultivated planet Nature 478 2011 337 342 21993620
- Hamby A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models Environ. Monit. Assess. 32 1994 135 154 24214086
- Hartikainen H. Mogensen L. Svanes E. Franke U. Food waste quantification in primary production – the Nordic countries as a case study Waste Manag. 71 2018 502 511 29100923
- Kemna R. van Holsteijn F. Lee P. Sims E. Optimal Food Storage Conditions in Refrigeration Appliances. Preparatory/review Study on Commission Regulation (EC) No. 643/2009 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 1060/2010 – Complementary Research on Optimal Food Storage Conditions in Refriger 2017
- Leclercq C. Arcella D. Piccinelli R. Sette S. Le Donne C. The italian national food consumption survey INRAN-SCAI 2005-06: main results in terms of food consumption Public Health Nutr. 12 2009 2504 2532 19278564
- Moriguchi Y. Hashimoto S. Material flow analysis and waste management Clift R. Druckman A. Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology 2016 Springer Cham
- Pearson A.M. Dutson T.R.. Inedible Meat By-products 2013 Springer Science & Business Media. Springer
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rao, M., Bast, A., & de Boer, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084428 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
By-Products of Dates, Cherries, Plums and Artichokes: A Source of Valuable Bioactive Compounds
Soares Mateus, A. R., Pena, A., Sendón, R., Almeida, C., Nieto, G. A., Khwaldia, K., & Sanches Silva, A. (2023) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2022.12.004 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Guo, X., Broeze, J., Groot, J. J., Axmann, H., & Vollebregt, M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12187488 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“After Porter’s work, Caldeira, De Laurentiis, Corrado, van Holsteijn and Sala [32] performed a mass flow analysis to quantify FLW in the European Union (EU) and concluded that the stage contributing the most to FLW varies amongst product groups (e.”
BackgroundWang, Y., Pan, S., Yin, J., Feng, H., Wang, M., & Chen, T. (2022) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.016 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Sustainable and Health-Protecting Food Ingredients from Bioprocessed Food by-Products and Wastes
Minervini, F., Comitini, F., De Boni, A., Fiorino, G. M., Rodrigues, F., Tlais, A. Z. A., Carafa, I., & De Angelis, M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142215283 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A Hierarchical Pyramid for Food Waste Based on a Social Innovation Perspective
Lombardi, M., & Costantino, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13094661 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Caldeira, C., De Laurentiis, V., Corrado, S., van Holsteijn, F., & Sala, S.
- Affiliations
- European Commission (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Sala, Serenella
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 149
- Pages
- 479-488
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6703187
- OpenAlex
- W2955686654
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 26
- FWCI
- 31.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Joint Research Centre
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- food waste, food supply chain, mass flow analysis, food groups, Sustainable Development Goal 12.3, food waste reduction, cereals, fruits and vegetables, European Union, top-down approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review