Cited by 72Sharing Economy and PlatformsService and Product InnovationTransportation and Mobility Innovations

Digitalised product-service systems: Effects on consumers’ attitudes and experiences

Open access
Tunn, V.S.C., van den Hende, E.A., Bocken, N.M.P., Schoormans, J.P.L.·2020·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

Access-based product-service systems (AB-PSS) allow consumers to use products for a fee and might support the transition towards a circular economy. This type of business model could decrease negative impacts of consumption by reducing the number of products needed; either by extending products’ lifetimes or by intensifying the use of products. Many AB-PSS in consumer markets are highly digitalised; they utilise digital platforms, have sensors embedded in the products, and rely on users’ smartphones. To better understand how digitalisation impacts consumers’ attitudes and use experiences in mobility AB-PSS, we applied a mixed-methods approach consisting of a survey (n=47) and interviews (n=10). Our findings suggest that many short-term AB-PSS, such as bicycle sharing, owe their recent success to digitalisation. Further, consumers’ digital confidence influences their attitude towards short-term AB-PSS. During the use of AB-PSS, users value the convenience and flexibility enabled by the digital aspects. Digitalisation also made short-term mobility AB-PSS susceptible to disruptions because the AB-PSS rely on the functioning of many digital aspects. Users seem to dislike phoning customer service and increasingly depend on their smartphones. We also provide a brief outlook of what 5G mobile networks might imply for mobility AB-PSS. With this paper, we contribute a consumer perspective on the digitalisation of services. Our findings help service designers, user experience designers, and app developers to design digitalised AB-PSS for consumer markets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105045

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common barriers to circular business models include consumers' reluctance to use technologically dated products and original equipment manufacturers' uncertainty about revenue and profit in increasingly dematerialised value chains.

    “Common barriers include consumers' reluctance to use technologically dated products and OEMs' uncertainty about revenue and profit in increasingly dematerialised value chains (Tunn et al. 2020;van der Velden et al. 2023).”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Tunn et al. 2020

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says many consumers are unenthusiastic about access-based product-service systems and still value ownership. It does not link that reluctance to technologically dated products. The passages found on digitalisation and business models do not address OEMs’ uncertainty about revenue or profit in dematerialised value chains. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G.M., 2012. Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. J. Cons. Res. 39 (4), 881-898.
  2. Belk, R., 2014a. You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. J. Bus. Res. 67 (8), 1595-1600.
  3. Bocken, N.M., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., van der Grinten, B., 2016. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J.Ind. Prod. Eng. 33 (5), 308-320.
  4. Aagaard, A. (Ed.), Sustainable Business Models. Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  5. Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F.J., de Reuver, M., 2018. The impact of digi- talization on business models. digital policy. Regul. Gover. 20 (2), 105-124.
  6. Brannen, J., 2005. Mixing methods: The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodology 8 (3), 173-184.
  7. Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Perona, M., Saccani, N., 2018. Exploring how usage-fo- cused business models enable circular economy through digital technologies. Sustainability 10 (3), 639.
  8. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Chiaroni, D., Del Vecchio, P., Urbinati, A., 2020. Designing business models in circular economy: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Bus. Strat. Env. 29 (4), 1734-1749.
  9. Fishman, E., 2016. Bikeshare: a review of recent literature. Transp. Rev. 36 (1), 92-113.
  10. Hassenzahl, M., 2001. The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 13 (4), 481-499.
  11. Ingemarsdotter, E., Jamsin, E., Kortuem, G., Balkenende, R., 2019. Circular strategies enabled by the internet of things-a framework and analysis of current practice. Sustainability 11 (20), 5689.
  12. Kjaer, L.L., Pigosso, D.C., Niero, M., Bech, N.M., McAloone, T.C., 2019. Product/servi- ce-systems for a circular economy: the route to decoupling economic growth from resource consumption? J. Indust. Ecol. 23 (1), 22-35.
  13. Labrecque, L.I., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T.P., Hofacker, C.F., 2013. Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age. J. Inter. Market. 27 (4), 257-269.
  14. Lüdeke-Freund, F., Gold, S., Bocken, N.M., 2019. A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. J. Indust. Ecol. 23 (1), 36-61.
  15. Mont, O.K., 2002. Clarifying the concept of product-service system. J. Clean. Prod. 10 (3), 237-245.
  16. Okorie, O., Salonitis, K., Charnley, F., Moreno, M., Turner, C., Tiwari, A., 2018. Digitisation and the circular economy: a review of current research and future trends. Energies 11 (11), 3009.
  17. Poppelaars, F., Bakker, C., van Engelen, J., 2018. Does access Trump ownership? ex- ploring consumer acceptance of access-based consumption in the case of smart- phones. Sustainability 10 (7), 2133.
  18. Pouri, M.J., Hilty, L.M., 2020. Digitally enabled sharing and the circular economy: to- wards a framework for sustainability assessment. Advances and New Trends in Environmental Informatics. Springer, Cham, pp. 105-116.
  19. Rachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., Schirgi, E., 2018. Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.
  20. Rijsdijk, S.A., Hultink, E.J., Diamantopoulos, A., 2007. Product intelligence: its con- ceptualization, measurement and impact on consumer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 35 (3), 340-356.
  21. Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., Terzi, S., 2019. Towards Circular Business Models: A systematic literature review on classification frameworks and archetypes. J. Cleaner Prod., 117696.
  22. Roy, R., 2000. Sustainable product-service systems. Futures 32 (3-4), 289-299.
  23. Ryan, G.W., Bernard, H.R., 2003. Techniques to identify themes. Field methods 15 (1), 85-109.
  24. Schaefers, T., Wittkowski, K., Benoit, S., Ferraro, R., 2016. Contagious effects of customer misbehavior in access-based services. J. Serv. Res. 19 (1), 3-21.
  25. Shaheen, S.A., Guzman, S., Zhang, H., 2010. Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: past, present, and future. Transp. Res. Rec. 2143 (1), 159-167.
  26. Sussan, F., Autio, E. and Kosturik, J., 2016, November. Leveraging ICTs for better lives: the introduction of an index on digital life. In CPRLATAM Conference, Mexico, June.
  27. Tunn, V.S.C., Bocken, N.M.P., van den Hende, E.A., Schoormans, J.P.L., 2020. Diffusion of access-based product-service systems: adoption barriers and how they are addressed in practice. In: PLATE Product Lifetimes And The Environment 2019 -Conference Proceedings.
  28. Valencia Cardona, A.M., Mugge, R., Schoormans, J.P., Schifferstein, H.N., 2015. The design of smart product-service systems (PSSs): an exploration of design character- istics. Int. J. Des. 9 (1), 2015.
  29. Van den Hende, E.A., Schoormans, J.P., 2012. The story is as good as the real thing: Early customer input on product applications of radically new technologies. J. Product Innov. Manag. 29 (4), 655-666.
  30. Roland Berger. Wünderlich, N.V., Wangenheim, F.V., Bitner, M.J., 2013. High tech and high touch: a framework for understanding user attitudes and behaviors related to smart inter- active services. J. Serv. Res. 16 (1), 3-20.
  31. Ziegeldorf, J.H., Morchon, O.G., Wehrle, K., 2014. Privacy in the Internet of Things: threats and challenges. Sec. Comm. Net. 7 (12), 2728-2742.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tunn, V. S. C., van den Hende, E. A., Bocken, N. M. P., & Schoormans, J. P. L.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Tunn, V.S.C.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
162
Pages
105045
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044675053
Cited by
72
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Marie Sklodowska-Curie innovative training network Circ€uit (721909)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Keywords
digitalization, consumer attitudes, user experience, circular economy, mobility services, bike sharing, digital confidence, smartphone addiction, 5G, service disruption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review