Cited by 67Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and DevelopmentRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

Replaced too soon? An exploration of Western European consumers’ replacement of electronic products

Open access
Magnier, L., Mugge, R.·2022·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

This article explores consumers’ replacement of electronic products. A survey with 617 participants from Western Europe who had recently replaced their smartphones, vacuum cleaners, televisions or washing machines gives us insights on the age and state of products when replaced, repair considerations and the extent to which 19 reasons for replacement influenced the replacement decision. Overall, the results show that lifetimes were relatively short. Most products were replaced while they were still performing their main function, but showing a loss in performance. A majority of respondents (60%) replacing their defective product did not even consider repairing it. Interestingly, more of the respondents considered repairing a broken product (58.6%) than a partly malfunctioning one (30%). Washing machines were replaced for functional reasons while televisions were replaced because the consumers were attracted by the new features. Satiation was consistently one of the most important reasons to replace smartphones, vacuum cleaners and televisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106448

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Failing to meet evolving expectations for performance, features and user experience creates significant barriers, such as a loss of consumer trust and a stigma against aging devices, ultimately hindering the widespread adoption of circular business models.

    “Failing to meet evolving expectations for performance, features and user experience creates significant barriers, such as a loss of consumer trust and a stigma against aging devices, ultimately hindering the widespread adoption of CBMs (Magnier and Mugge 2022;van den Berge et al. 2023).”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Magnier and Mugge 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although extending the product life cycle promotes sufficiency, it can simultaneously erode the perceived consumer value proposition if products are perceived as outdated.

    “Although extending the PLC promotes sufficiency, it can simultaneously erode the perceived consumer value proposition if products are perceived as outdated.”
  • Tailoring a compelling value proposition is the primary hurdle for the product-as-a-service model, as it must overcome deeply ingrained consumer preferences for product ownership and concerns about long-term costs.

    “Tailoring a compelling value proposition is the primary hurdle, as it must overcome deeply ingrained consumer preferences for product ownership and concerns about long-term costs (Boyer et al. 2021;Magnier and Mugge 2022).”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Magnier and Mugge 2022

    Section 2.3 discusses how consumers weigh the value and costs of replacing an owned product. It does not address product-as-a-service, a preference for ownership over that model, long-term service costs, or the claim that crafting a value proposition is its primary hurdle. Searches for product-as-a-service, ownership preferences, subscriptions, and long-term costs found no passage addressing those points; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Ackermann, L., 2018. Design for product care: Enhancing consumers' repair and maintenance activities. The Design Journal 21 (4), 543-551.
  2. Ackermann, L., Mugge, R., Schoormans, J., 2018. Consumers' perspective on product care: An exploratory study of motivators, ability factors, and triggers. Journal of Cleaner Production 183, 380-391.
  3. Ackermann, L., Tuimaka, M., Pohlmeyer, A.E., Mugge, R., 2021. Design for Product Care-Development of Design Strategies and a Toolkit for Sustainable Consumer Behaviour. Journal of Sustainability Research 3 (2).
  4. Arcos, B.P., Bakker, C., Flipsen, B., Balkenende, R., 2020. Practices of fault diagnosis in household appliances: Insights for design. Journal of Cleaner Production 265, 121812.
  5. Bayus, B.L., 1991. The consumer durable replacement buyer. Journal of Marketing 55 (1), 42-51.
  6. Belk, R.W., 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2), 139-168.
  7. Bellezza, S., Ackerman, J.M., Gino, F., 2017. Be careless with that!" Availability of product upgrades increases cavalier behavior toward possessions. Journal of Marketing Research 54 (5), 768-784.
  8. Bloch, P.H., 1995. Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing 59 (3), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252116. · DOI
  9. Bocken, N.M., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., Van Der Grinten, B., 2016. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of industrial and production engineering 33 (5), 308-320.
  10. Bonvoisin, J., Halstenberg, F., Buchert, T., Stark, R., 2016. A systematic literature review on modular product design. Journal of Engineering Design 27 (7), 488-514.
  11. Box, J. M. (1983). Extending product lifetime: Prospects and opportunities. European Journal of Marketing.
  12. Brönneke, T., 2017. Premature obsolescence: Suggestions for legislative counter- measures in German and European sales & consumer law. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 14 (3-4), 361-372.
  13. Brusselaers, J., Bracquene, E., Peeters, J., & Dams, Y. (2019). Economic consequences of consumer repair strategies for electrical household devices. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
  14. Cooper, T., 2005. Slower consumption reflections on product life spans and the "throwaway society. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9 (1-2), 51-67.
  15. Corneo, G., Jeanne, O., 1997. Conspicuous consumption, snobbism and conformism. Journal of public economics 66 (1), 55-71.
  16. Coughlan, D., Fitzpatrick, C., McMahon, M., 2018. Repurposing end of life notebook computers from consumer WEEE as thin client computers-A hybrid end of life strategy for the Circular Economy in electronics. Journal of Cleaner Production 192, 809-820.
  17. De Fazio, F., Bakker, C., Flipsen, B., Balkenende, R., 2021. The Disassembly Map: A new method to enhance design for product repairability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128552.
  18. Guiltinan, J., 2009. Creative destruction and destructive creations: environmental ethics and planned obsolescence. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1), 19-28.
  19. Hielscher, S., Jaeger-Erben, M., Poppe, E., 2020. Modular smartphones and circular design strategies: The shape of things to come? The Routledge Handbook of Waste, Resources and the Circular Economy. Routledge, pp. 337-349.
  20. Hou, C., Jo, M.-S., Sarigöllü, E., 2020. Feelings of satiation as a mediator between a product's perceived value and replacement intentions. Journal of Cleaner Production 258, 120637.
  21. Huang, E.M., Truong, K.N., 2008. Breaking the disposable technology paradigm: opportunities for sustainable interaction design for mobile phones. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
  22. Jaeger-Erben, M., Frick, V., Hipp, T., 2021. Why do users (not) repair their devices? A study of the predictors of repair practices. Journal of Cleaner Production 286, 125382.
  23. Jensen, J.P., Prendeville, S.M., Bocken, N.M., Peck, D., 2019. Creating sustainable value through remanufacturing: Three industry cases. Journal of Cleaner Production 218, 304-314.
  24. Khan, M.A., Mittal, S., West, S., Wuest, T., 2018. Review on upgradability-A product lifetime extension strategy in the context of product service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 204, 1154-1168.
  25. Laitala, K., Klepp, I.G., Haugrønning, V., Throne-Holst, H., Strandbakken, P., 2021. Increasing repair of household appliances, mobile phones and clothing: Experiences from consumers and the repair industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 282, 125349.
  26. Madon, J., 2021. Free repair against the consumer society: How repair cafés socialize people to a new relationship to objects. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1469540521990871.
  27. Makov, T., Fishman, T., Chertow, M.R., Blass, V., 2019. What affects the secondhand value of smartphones: evidence from eBay. Journal of Industrial Ecology 23 (3), 549-559.
  28. Makov, T., Fitzpatrick, C., 2021. Is repairability enough? big data insights into smartphone obsolescence and consumer interest in repair. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127561.
  29. Michaud, C., Joly, I., Llerena, D., Lobasenko, V., 2017. Consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable and innovative products: a choice experiment with upgradeable products. International Journal of Sustainable Development 20 (1-2), 8-32.
  30. Mugge, R., Schoormans, J.P., Schifferstein, H.N., 2005. Design strategies to postpone consumers' product replacement: The value of a strong person-product relationship. The Design Journal 8 (2), 38-48.
  31. Okada, E.M., 2001. Trade-ins, mental accounting, and product replacement decisions. Journal of Consumer Research 27 (4), 433-446.
  32. Osibanjo, O., Nnorom, I., 2007. The challenge of electronic waste (e-waste) management in developing countries. Waste management & research 25 (6), 489-501.
  33. Page, T.J.I.J.o.S.D, 2014. Product attachment and replacement: implications for sustainable design 2 (3), 265-282.
  34. Poppe, E., Wagner, E., Jaeger-Erben, M., Druschke, J., Köhn, M., 2021. Is it a bug or a feature? The concept of software obsolescence. In: Paper presented at the 4th Plate virtual conference, Limerick (Ireland).
  35. Poppelaars, F., Bakker, C., van Engelen, J., 2020. Design for divestment in a circular economy: Stimulating voluntary return of smartphones through design. Sustainability 12 (4), 1488.
  36. Proske, M., Jaeger-Erben, M., 2019. Decreasing obsolescence with modular smartphones?-An interdisciplinary perspective on lifecycles. Journal of Cleaner Production 223, 57-66.
  37. Shani, Y., Appel, G., Danziger, S., Shachar, R., 2020. When and why consumers "accidentally" endanger their products. Management Science 66 (12), 5757-5782.
  38. Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I., Gross, B.L., 1991. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research 22 (2), 159-170.
  39. Tecchio, P., Ardente, F., Mathieux, F., 2019. Understanding lifetimes and failure modes of defective washing machines and dishwashers. Journal of Cleaner Production 215, 1112-1122.
  40. van den Berge, R., Magnier, L., Mugge, R., 2020. Premature Product Replacement: An Exploration of the Reasons Why People Replace Products. In: Paper presented at the IS4CE2020: Conference of the International Society for the Circular Economy (Held online).
  41. van den Berge, R., Magnier, L., Mugge, R., 2021a. A poorly educated guess: consumers' lifetime estimations, attitudes towards repairability, and a product lifetime label. In: Paper presented at the Plate Conference, online.
  42. Van Nes, N., Cramer, J., 2005. Influencing product lifetime through product design. Business Strategy and the Environment 14 (5), 286-299.
  43. Van Nes, N., Cramer, J., 2006. Product lifetime optimization: a challenging strategy towards more sustainable consumption patterns. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (15-16), 1307-1318.
  44. van Weelden, E., Mugge, R., Bakker, C., 2016. Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market. Journal of Cleaner Production 113, 743-754.
  45. Weijters, B., Baumgartner, H., 2012. Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: A review. Journal of Marketing Research 49 (5), 737-747.
  46. Wilhelm, W., 2012. Encouraging sustainable consumption through product lifetime extension: The case of mobile phones. International Journal of Business and Social Science 3 (3).
  47. Wilhelm, W., Yankov, A., Magee, P., 2011. Mobile phone consumption behavior and the need for sustainability innovations. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability 7 (2), 20-40.
  48. Woidasky, J., Cetinkaya, E., 2021. Use pattern relevance for laptop repair and product lifetime. Journal of Cleaner Production 288, 125425.
  49. Zallio, M., Berry, D., 2017. Design and Planned Obsolescence. Theories and Approaches for Designing Enabling Technologies. The Design Journal 20 (sup1), S3749-S3761.

Authors
Magnier, L., & Mugge, R.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Magnier, L.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
185
Pages
106448
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283074670
Cited by
67
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (820331, HORIZON2020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
product substitution, electronic devices, consumer behavior, product lifetime, defective products, satiation, smartphones, vacuum cleaners, television, washing machines, Western Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review