Cited by 160Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesSustainable Supply Chain ManagementTransportation Systems and Infrastructure

The hibernating mobile phone: Dead storage as a barrier to efficient electronic waste recovery

Open access
Wilson, Garrath T., Smalley, Grace, Suckling, James R., Lilley, Debra, Lee, Jacquetta, Mawle, Richard·2017·Waste Management

Abstract

Hibernation, the dead storage period when a mobile phone is still retained by the user at its end-of-life, is both a common and a significant barrier to the effective flow of time-sensitive stock value within a circular economic model. In this paper we present the findings of a survey of 181 mobile phone owners, aged between 18-25years old, living and studying in the UK, which explored mobile phone ownership, reasons for hibernation, and replacement motives. This paper also outlines and implements a novel mechanism for quantifying the mean hibernation period based on the survey findings. The results show that only 33.70% of previously owned mobile phones were returned back into the system. The average duration of ownership of mobile phones kept and still in hibernation was 4years 11months, with average use and hibernation durations of 1year 11months, and 3years respectively; on average, mobile phones that are kept by the user are hibernated for longer than they are ever actually used as primary devices. The results also indicate that mobile phone replacement is driven primarily by physical (technological, functional and absolute) obsolescence, with economic obsolescence, partly in response to the notion of being 'due an upgrade', also featuring significantly. We also identify in this paper the concept of a secondary phone, a recently replaced phone that holds a different function for the user than their primary phone but is still valued and intentionally retained by the user, and which, we conclude, should be accounted for in any reverse logistics strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.023

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers such as reluctance to accept secondhand products, outdated technology, desire for up-to-date devices, smartphone storage, and inappropriate disposal methods are considered significant.

    “Customer awareness: Barriers such as a reluctance to accept secondhand products, outdated technology, and having a desire for up-to-date devices [53], as well as smartphone storage and inappropriate disposal methods, are also considered significant [54].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2012. RE: A Review of National Resource Strategies and Research.
  2. Hanks, K., Odom, W., Roedl, D., Blevis, E., 2008. Sustainable Millenials: Attitudes towards Sustainability and the Material Effects of Interactive Technologies. CHI 2008, April 5-10, 2008, Florence, Italy.
  3. Jackson, T., 2005. Motivating Sustainable Consumption: A Review of Evidence on Consumer Behaviour and Behavioural Change, a Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey.
  4. Stahel, W., Reday, G., 1976/1981. Jobs for Tomorrow, the Potential for Substituting Manpower for Energy: Report to the Commission of the European Communities. Vantage Press, New York.
  5. Which?, 2015. Millions of Pounds Wasted Paying for Mobiles People Already Own [Online] Available: <https://press.which.co.uk/whichpressreleases/millions-of- pounds-wasted-paying-for-mobiles-people-already-own/> (Accessed 9 May 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, G. T., Smalley, G., Suckling, J. R., Lilley, D., Lee, J., & Mawle, R.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Garrath T.
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
60
Pages
521-533
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2569949736
Cited by
159
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K026380/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Transportation Systems and Infrastructure
Keywords
dead storage, mobile phone ownership, technological obsolescence, economic obsolescence, reverse logistics, circular economy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, United Kingdom, Humans, Ownership, Surveys and Questionnaires, Models, Economic, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Electronic Waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review