CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polycentric governance in waste management: A mechanism analysis of actors’ behavior evolution at the community level

Hao, Xinyu, Dong, Liang, Liu, Guangfu, Zhang, Xiaoling·2023·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106879
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106879

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Ao, 2022, Identifying the driving factors of rural residents’ household waste classification behavior: evidence from Sichuan, China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 180, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106159 · DOI
  2. Biehl, 2021, Creating space for wind energy in a polycentric governance setting, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 152, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111672 · DOI
  3. Biggs, 2012, Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour, 37, 421, 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836 · DOI
  4. Chakrabarti, 2009, Public-community participation in household waste management in India: An operational approach, Habitat Int, 33, 125, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.05.009 · DOI
  5. Chen, 2021, Formal or informal recycling sectors? Household solid waste recycling behavior based on multi-agent simulation, J. Environ. Manage., 294, 113006, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113006 · DOI
  6. Chu, 2022, Recycling of waste glass powder as paste replacement in green UHPFRC, Constr. Build. Mater., 316, 125719, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125719 · DOI
  7. Chu, 2019, The policy-making trend analysis of municipal solid waste in China 1980–2015, Waste Manage. Res., 37, 601, 10.1177/0734242X19836722 · DOI
  8. Cong, 2021, Polycentric approach of wastewater governance in textile industrial parks: case study of local governance innovation in China, J. Environ. Manage., 280, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111730 · DOI
  9. Davies, 2009, Clean and green? A governance analysis of waste management in New Zealand, J. Environ. Plann. Manag., 52, 157, 10.1080/09640560802666503 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Deal, 2016, Discerning and addressing environmental failures in policy scenarios using planning support system (PSS) technologies, Sustainability, 9, 13, 10.3390/su9010013 · DOI
  11. Duan, 2019, Post-consumer packaging waste from express delivery in China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 144, 137, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.037 · DOI
  12. Hamilton, 2018, Collaborative governance of climate change adaptation across spatial and institutional scales, Policy Stud. J., 46, 222, 10.1111/psj.12224 · DOI
  13. Hao, 2022, The coevolution mechanism of stakeholder strategies in the recycled resources industry innovation ecosystem: the view of evolutionary game theory, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 179, 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121627 · DOI · Paper page
  14. He, 2022, Exploring the EPR system for power battery recycling from a supply-side perspective: an evolutionary game analysis, Waste Manag., 140, 204, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.026 · DOI
  15. Heinen, 2021, Five dimensions of climate governance: a framework for empirical research based on polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives, Environ. Policy Gov., 32, 56, 10.1002/eet.1963 · DOI
  16. Hong, 2017, Intensification of municipal solid waste disposal in China, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 69, 168, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.185 · DOI
  17. Lee-Geiller, 2021, From management to stewardship: a comparative case study of waste governance in New York City and Seoul metropolitan city, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 164, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105110 · DOI
  18. Li, 2019, An evolutionary analysis on the effect of government policies on electric vehicle diffusion in complex network, Energy Policy, 129, 1, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.070 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ling, 2013, Management and recycling of waste glass in concrete products: Current situations in Hong Kong, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 70, 25, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.10.006 · DOI
  20. Liu, 2018, Polycentric Urban Development in China: a multi-scale analysis, Environ. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci., 45, 953
  21. Liu, 2021, Promotion of household waste utilization in China: lessons learnt from three case studies, Sustainability, 13, 11598, 10.3390/su132111598 · DOI
  22. Lubell, 2021, Institutional navigation for polycentric sustainability governance, Nat. Sustain., 4, 664, 10.1038/s41893-021-00707-5 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lyapunov, 1992, The general problem of the stability of motion, Int. J. Control., 55, 531, 10.1080/00207179208934253 · DOI
  24. Ma, 2020, Evolutionary game analysis of construction waste recycling management in China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 161, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104863 · DOI
  25. Marsan, 2016, Stochastic evolutionary differential games toward a systems theory of behavioral social dynamics, Math. Models Meth. Appl. Sci., 26, 1051, 10.1142/S0218202516500251 · DOI
  26. Meng, 2019, Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents’ household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 140, 224, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.021 · DOI
  27. Monios, 2019, Polycentric port governance, Transp. Policy, 83, 26, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.005 · DOI
  28. Morrison, 2017, Evolving polycentric governance of the Great Barrier Reef, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 114, 10.1073/pnas.1620830114 · DOI
  29. Morrison, 2019, The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance, Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens., 57, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101934 · DOI
  30. Nagendra, 2014, Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of Urban Lake Commons in Bangalore, India, Ecol. Soc., 19, 10.5751/ES-06582-190267 · DOI
  31. Nature research custom media., 2022. Closing the loop on waste. https://www.nature.com/articles/d42473-021-00540-6, accessed on 27 April 2022.
  32. Ostrom, 1999, Coping with tragedies of the commons, Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 2, 493, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493 · DOI
  33. Ostrom, 2010, Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems, Am. Econ, Rev., 100, 641, 10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Ostrom, 2014, A polycentric approach for coping with climate change, Ann. Econ. Financ., 15, 97
  35. Pahl-Wostl, 2014, The capacity of water governance to deal with the climate change adaptation challenge: using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to distinguish between polycentric, fragmented and centralized regimes, Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens., 29, 139, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Pan, 2022, Participatory development of planning support systems to improve empowerment and localization, J. Urban Technol., 29, 33, 10.1080/10630732.2022.2031431 · DOI
  37. Ritzberger, 1995, Evolutionary selection in normal-form games, Econometrica, 63, 1371, 10.2307/2171774 · DOI
  38. Sekito, 2013, Influence of a community-based waste management system on people’s behavior and waste reduction, Resour. Conserv. Recycle., 72, 84, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.001 · DOI
  39. Shaw, 2008, The potential of financial incentives to enhance householders’ kerbside recycling behaviour, Waste Manage, 28, 1732, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.08.008 · DOI
  40. Su, 2020, Multi-agent evolutionary game in the recycling utilization of construction waste, Sci. Total Environ., 738, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139826 · DOI
  41. Su, 2020, Promoting the sustainable development of the recycling market of construction and demolition waste: a stakeholder game perspective, J. Clean. Prod., 277, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122281 · DOI
  42. Tan, 2022, Research on the carbon neutrality governance under a polycentric approach, Adv. Clim. Chang. Res., 13, 159, 10.1016/j.accre.2022.01.005 · DOI
  43. Wang, 2020, Public perception matters: individual waste sorting in Chinese communities, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 159, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104860 · DOI
  44. Wang, 2021, Implementation effect of municipal solid waste mandatory sorting policy in Shanghai, J. Environ. Manag., 298, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113512 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Wang, 2020, Evolutionary game analysis on behavioral strategies of multiple stakeholders in E-waste recycling industry, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 155, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104618 · DOI
  46. Wi, 2019, Promoting pro-environmental behaviour in a community in Singapore–from raising awareness to behavioural change, Environ. Educ. Res., 25, 1019, 10.1080/13504622.2018.1528496 · DOI
  47. Xiao, 2023, Assessing the carbon reduction potential of municipal solid waste management transition: effects of incineration, technology and sorting in Chinese cities, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 188, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106713 · DOI
  48. Xiao, 2020, Does the development of delivery industry increase the production of municipal solid waste?—an empirical study of China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 155, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104577 · DOI
  49. Xu, 2021, Research on cooperation mechanism of marine plastic waste management based on complex network evolutionary game, Mar. Pol., 134, 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104774 · DOI
  50. Yang, 2022, Decision-making dynamic evolution among groups regarding express packaging waste recycling under different reference dependence and information policy, Waste Manag., 138, 262, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.003 · DOI
  51. Zhang, 2022, Carbon neutrality prediction of municipal solid waste treatment sector under the shared socioeconomic pathways, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 186, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106528 · DOI
  52. Zhang, 2022, Mapping the environmental impacts and policy effectiveness of takeaway food industry in China, Sci. Total Environ., 808, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152023 · DOI
  53. Zhou, 2022, Household waste management in Singapore and Shanghai: Experiences, challenges and opportunities from the perspective of emerging megacities, Waste Manage., 144, 221, 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.03.029 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Zomorrodi, 2017, Genome-driven evolutionary game theory helps understand the rise of metabolic interdependencies in microbial communities, Nat. Commun., 8, 1, 10.1038/s41467-017-01407-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hao, X., Dong, L., Liu, G., & Zhang, X.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
191
Pages
106879
ISSN
0921-3449
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106879
Cited by
12
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review