The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“One way that transitions can occur is through innovations in protected niches that may have an impact on the dominant socio-technical regime [3].”
From From Local Initiatives to Coalitions for an Effective Agroecology Strategy: Lessons from South Africa (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in strategic management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,973
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
DiMaggio, P. (1983) · American Sociological Review · Cited by 9,078
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,563
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,039
The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
Birnbaum, R., Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2005) · Academe · doi:10.2307/40252749 · Cited by 7,570
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,006
Wolfram, M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.044 · Cited by 126
Supporting and practising digital innovation with advisers in smart farming
Ayre, M. L., Collum, V. M., Waters, W., Samson, P. R., Curro, A., Nettle, R. A., Paschen, J.-A., King, B., & Reichelt, N. (2019) · NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2019.05.001 · Cited by 126
Towards a sustainable forest-based bioeconomy in Italy: Findings from a SWOT analysis
Falcone, P. M., Tani, A., Târţiu, V. E., & Imbriani, C. (2019) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.014 · Cited by 130
Lancker, J. V., Mondelaers, K., Wauters, E., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2015) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.008 · Cited by 125
David, M. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.023 · Cited by 125
System dynamics modelling and simulation for sociotechnical transitions research
Papachristos, G. (2018) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.10.001 · Cited by 135
Sovacool, B. K., Geels, F. W., Andersen, A. D., Grubb, M. J., Jordan, A., Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., Lockwood, M., Markard, J., Meadowcroft, J., et al. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103948 · Cited by 147
Self-citationExploring urban transformations in Latin America
Romero-Lankao, P., & Gnatz, D. M. (2013) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008 · Cited by 66
The role of politics in sustainable transitions: The rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway
Normann, H. E. (2014) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.002 · Cited by 124
Ethiopia׳s emerging domestic biogas sector: Current status, bottlenecks and drivers
Kamp, L. M., & Forn, E. B. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.068 · Cited by 124
Ecological Intensification: Local Innovation to Address Global Challenges
Tittonell, P. A., Klerkx, L., Baudron, F., Félix, G. F., Ruggia, A., van Apeldoorn, D. F., Dogliotti, S., Mapfumo, P., & Rossing, W. A. H. (2016) · Sustainable agriculture reviews · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26777-7_1 · Cited by 128
Opening up the black box of learning-by-doing in sustainability transitions
Poeck, K. V., Östman, L., & Block, T. R. (2018) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.006 · Cited by 161
van Ginkel, K., Botzen, W. J. W., Haasnoot, M., Bachner, G., Steininger, K. W., Hinkel, J., Watkiss, P., Boere, E., Jeuken, A., de Murieta, E. S., et al. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab6395 · Cited by 135
Regime resistance and accommodation: Toward a neo-Gramscian perspective on energy transitions
Ford, A. S., & Newell, P. J. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102163 · Cited by 123
Fraedrich, E. M., Beiker, S. A., & Lenz, B. (2015) · European Journal of Futures Research · doi:10.1007/s40309-015-0067-8 · Cited by 123
A hard slog, not a leap frog: Globalization and sustainability transitions in developing Asia
Rock, M. T., Murphy, J. T., Rasiah, R., van Seters, P., & Managi, S. (2008) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.11.014 · Cited by 123
Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: towards a theoretical framework
Gong, H., & Hassink, R. (2018) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1494824 · Cited by 133
Andersen, A. D., & Markard, J. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119802 · Cited by 123
Geddes, A., & Schmidt, T. S. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.103985 · Cited by 125
Öhman, A., Karakaya, E., & Urban, F. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102384 · Cited by 123
Lamine, C. (2012) · Terrains & travaux · doi:10.3917/tt.020.0139 · Cited by 120
Agencement in housing markets: The case of the UK construction industry
Lovell, H., & Smith, S. J. (2010) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.11.015 · Cited by 122
Hess, D. J. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.01.002 · Cited by 122
Chapman, A. J., & Itaoka, K. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.011 · Cited by 122
From consumerism to wellbeing: toward a cultural transition?
Brown, H. S., & Vergragt, P. J. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.107 · Cited by 147
Blomsma, F., Bauwens, T., Weissbrod, I., & Kirchherr, J. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3106 · Cited by 122
Innovation niches and socio-technical transition: A case study of bio-refinery production
Lopolito, A., Morone, P., & Sisto, R. (2011) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.002 · Cited by 121
Innovation, low energy buildings and intermediaries in Europe: systematic case study review
Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2017) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-017-9547-y · Cited by 121
Wihlborg, M., Sörensen, J., & Olsson, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.018 · Cited by 121
Trojan horses in transitions: A dialectical perspective on innovation ‘capture’
Pel, B. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2015.1090903 · Cited by 120
A critical review of discursive approaches in energy transitions
Isoaho, K., & Karhunmaa, K. (2019) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.043 · Cited by 124
Slayton, R. M., & Spinardi, G. (2015) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.08.004 · Cited by 119
One, no one, one hundred thousand energy transitions in Europe: The quest for a cultural approach
Sarrica, M., Brondi, S., Cottone, P., & Mazzara, B. M. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.019 · Cited by 118
Meeting the climate change challenge: local government climate action in British Columbia, Canada
Dale, A., Robinson, J., King, L., Burch, S. L., Newell, R., Shaw, A., & Jost, F. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1651244 · Cited by 141
Measuring sustainability: An evaluation framework for sustainability transition experiments
Williams, S., & Robinson, J. (2019) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.012 · Cited by 119
Fouquet, R., & Hippe, R. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102736 · Cited by 121
Toward a Sustainable and Resilient Future
O’Brien, K. L., Pelling, M., Patwardhan, A., Stéphane Hallegatte, A., Maskrey, A., Oki, T., Spring, Ú. O., Wilbanks, T. J., Yanda, P. Z., Giupponi, C., et al. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139177245.011 · Cited by 124
The shadowy side of innovation: unmaking and sustainability
Shove, E. (2012) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.663961 · Cited by 118
Colvin, J., Blackmore, C., Chimbuya, S., Collins, K., Dent, M. C., Goss, J. R., Ison, R. L., Roggero, P. P., & Seddaiu, G. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.010 · Cited by 124
A formative approach to the evaluation of Transformative Innovation Policies
Molas‐Gallart, J., Aristizábal, A. B., Giachi, S., & Schot, J. (2021) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvab016 · Cited by 118
Self-citationStructure reconsidered: Towards new foundations of explanatory transitions theory
Svensson, O., & Nikoleris, A. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.007 · Cited by 115
Nurdiawati, A., & Urban, F. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102358 · Cited by 117
Car and the city: Socio-technical transition pathways to 2030
Marletto, G. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.013 · Cited by 116
Andersson, F., & Karpestam, P. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.004 · Cited by 117
Matschoss, K., & Heiskanen, E. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.037 · Cited by 116
Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes?
Alkemade, F., Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.009 · Cited by 119
Niches and networks: Explaining network evolution through niche formation processes
Hermans, F., van Apeldoorn, D. F., Stuiver, M., & Kok, K. I. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.004 · Cited by 121
Linking a storyline with multiple models: A cross-scale study of the UK power system transition
Trutnevyte, E., Barton, J. P., O’Grady, Á., Ogunkunle, D., Pudjianto, D., & Robertson, E. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.08.018 · Cited by 115
Schneidewind, U., Augenstein, K., Stelzer, F., & Wanner, M. (2018) · GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society · doi:10.14512/gaia.27.s1.5 · Cited by 124
The need for reflexive evaluation approaches in development cooperation
Arkesteijn, M. C. M., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2015) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389014564719 · Cited by 120
The role of crowdfunding in moving towards a sustainable society
Testa, S., Nielsen, K. R., Bogers, M. L. A. M., & Cincotti, S. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.011 · Cited by 114
Wilkinson, S., Hojčková, K., Eon, C., Morrison, G. M., & Sandén, B. A. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101500 · Cited by 114
Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2008) · OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) · Cited by 114
Gaziulusoy, İ. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.012 · Cited by 140
Redefining power relations in agrifood systems
Rossi, A., Bui, S., & Marsden, T. (2019) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.002 · Cited by 130
Governing varieties of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new typology
Wittmann, F., Hufnagl, M., Lindner, R., Roth, F., & Edler, J. (2021) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scab044 · Cited by 113
Transforming Research and Innovation for Sustainable Food Systems—A Coupled-Systems Perspective
Kok, K. P. W., den Boer, A. C. L., Cesuroğlu, T., van der Meij, M. G., de Wildt-Liesveld, R., Regeer, B. J., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11247176 · Cited by 120
A socio-technical perspective on low carbon investment challenges – Insights for UK energy policy
Bolton, R., & Foxon, T. J. (2014) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.005 · Cited by 113
The unsustainable directionality of innovation – The example of the broadband transition
Røpke, I. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.002 · Cited by 110
Wells, P., & Xenias, D. (2015) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.001 · Cited by 111
Characteristics of bioeconomy systems and sustainability issues at the territorial scale. A review
Wohlfahrt, J., Ferchaud, F., Gabrielle, B., Godard, C., Kurek, B., Loyce, C., & Thérond, O. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.385 · Cited by 111
Sustainability transitions in the agri-food sector: How ecology affects transition dynamics
Vermunt, D. A., Negro, S. O., van Laerhoven, F., Verweij, P. A., & Hekkert, M. P. (2020) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.06.003 · Cited by 111
Universities responding to the call for sustainability: A typology of sustainability centres
Soini, K., Jurgilevich, A., Pietikäinen, J., & Korhonen‐Kurki, K. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.228 · Cited by 110
Dumont, A. M., & Baret, P. V. (2017) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.007 · Cited by 109
Fallde, M., & Eklund, M. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.089 · Cited by 109
Explaining regime destabilisation in the pulp and paper industry
Karltorp, K., & Sandén, B. A. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.12.001 · Cited by 117
Markard, J., Stadelmann, M., & Truffer, B. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.013 · Cited by 109
Schmitz, H. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315747378-11 · Cited by 111
van Welie, M. J., Cherunya, P. C., Truffer, B., & Murphy, J. T. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.059 · Cited by 100
Heiberg, J., Truffer, B., & Binz, C. (2021) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104363 · Cited by 112
Morel, K., Revoyron, E., San Cristobal, M., & Baret, P. V. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229910 · Cited by 111
The future of automobile society: a socio-technical transitions perspective
Cohen, M. J. (2012) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.663962 · Cited by 106
Governing agricultural innovation: A comprehensive framework to underpin sustainable transitions
de Boon, A., Sandström, C., & Rose, D. C. (2021) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.019 · Cited by 122
Asian development pathways and sustainable socio-technical regimes
Berkhout, F., Angel, D. P., & Wieczorek, A. J. (2008) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.017 · Cited by 106
Lazarevic, D., Kautto, P., & Antikainen, R. (2019) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.006 · Cited by 124
How Higher Education Institutions Walk Their Talk on the 2030 Agenda: A Systematic Literature Review
Fia, M., Ghasemzadeh, K., & Paletta, A. (2022) · Higher Education Policy · doi:10.1057/s41307-022-00277-x · Cited by 107
Stimulating transitions towards sustainable farming systems
Elzen, B., Barbier, M., Cerf, M., & Grin, J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_19 · Cited by 107
Gaziulusoy, İ., & Ryan, C. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.122 · Cited by 125
Andersen, A. D., Steen, M., Mäkitie, T., Hanson, J., Thune, T. M., & Soppe, B. (2020) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.009 · Cited by 92
Selvan, T., Panmei, L., Murasing, K. K., Guleria, V., Ramesh, K. R., Bhardwaj, D. R., Thakur, C. L., Kumar, D., Sharma, P., Umedsinh, R. D., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1170380 · Cited by 122
The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies
Larrue, P. (2021) · OECD science, technology and industry policy papers · doi:10.1787/3f6c76a4-en · Cited by 106
Schroeder, P., Vergragt, P. J., Brown, H. S., Dendler, L., Gorenflo, N., Matus, K., Quist, J., Rupprecht, C. D. D., Tukker, A., & Wennersten, R. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.050 · Cited by 105
Local lens for SDG implementation: lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa
Jiménez-Aceituno, A., Peterson, G., Norström, A. V., Wong, G., & Downing, A. S. (2019) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00746-0 · Cited by 105
Linking Complexity and Sustainability Theories: Implications for Modeling Sustainability Transitions
Peter, C., & Swilling, M. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6031594 · Cited by 120
Raven, R. P. J. M., & Walrave, B. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.008 · Cited by 104
Marletto, G. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.023 · Cited by 104
Andersen, A. D., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101447 · Cited by 104
Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Warren, C., Strachan, P. A., Szarka, J., Hadwin, R., Miner, P., Wolsink, M., & Nadaï, A. (2009) · Planning Theory & Practice · doi:10.1080/14649350903441555 · Cited by 104
Societal systems – Complex or worse?
Andersson, C., Törnberg, A., & Törnberg, P. (2014) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.07.003 · Cited by 110
van Sluisveld, M. A. E., Hof, A. F., Carrara, S., Geels, F. W., Nilsson, M., Rogge, K. S., Turnheim, B., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.024 · Cited by 119
Self-citationSmart local energy systems (SLES): A framework for exploring transition, context, and impacts
Ford, R., Maidment, C., Vigurs, C., Fell, M. J., & Morris, M. R. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120612 · Cited by 99
What hinder the further development of wind power in China?—A socio-technical barrier study
Zhao, Z.-Y., Chang, R., & Chen, Y. L. (2015) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.004 · Cited by 101
van Staveren, M. F., & van Tatenhove, J. P. M. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-08168-210108 · Cited by 103
Degrowth and postcapitalism: Transformative geographies beyond accumulation and growth
Schmid, B. (2019) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12470 · Cited by 117
(2019) · oekom verlag eBooks · doi:10.14512/9783962386887 · Cited by 102
Governing the net-zero transition: Strategy, policy, and politics
Meadowcroft, J., & Rosenbloom, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2207727120 · Cited by 112
Reshaping Urban Infrastructure
Hodson, M., Marvin, S., Robinson, B., & Swilling, M. (2012) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00559.x · Cited by 101
Eder, J. M., Mutsaerts, C. F., & Sriwannawit, P. (2015) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.014 · Cited by 101
Köhler, J., Turnheim, B., & Hodson, M. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.003 · Cited by 101
Hirschhorn, F., Paulsson, A., Sørensen, C. H., & Veeneman, W. W. (2019) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.016 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Geels, F. W., & Schot, J.
- Affiliations
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Geels, Frank W.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 399-417
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156304718
- Cited by
- 5,245
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 395 · 2025: 391 · 2024: 364 · 2023: 387 · 2022: 405 · 2021: 476 · 2020: 422 · 2019: 350 · 2018: 419 · 2017: 305 · 2016: 250 · 2015: 234 · 2014: 209 · 2013: 178 · 2012: 152
- FWCI
- 54.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- socio-technical transitions, transition pathways, multi-level perspective, typology, transformation, reconfiguration, technology substitution, multi-level interaction, system change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
