The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Users with experience in a technology-the lead users-are also able to shape subsequent technology development (than those originally intended) for further CE-I4.0 integration [140].”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
In the citing paper
“Users of CE-I4.0 tools are expected to develop different interpretations of new technologies as they use them in practice, which can drive additional variation [140] and functions in the original design stage, for example, design for remanufactured DfRem.”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
In the citing paper
“When existing I4.0 to CE approach technology reaches a point of diminishing returns, a new technology will emerge [140], e.g., from Bar code to RFID.”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
In the citing paper
“Key reasons exist which emphasize the need for known technological infrastructure to support CE-DT integration. These include the turbulent and competitive markets [142] which industries and CE stakeholders operate from [140], the increasingly complex IT environment which organizations deal with, data complexity, and interconnected data networks [145].”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,616
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,349
Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.
Gamson, W. A., & Goffman, E. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2064022 · Cited by 11,891
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,563
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Farrell, 1988, Coordination through committees and markets, The Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 235, 10.2307/2555702 · DOI
- Kaplan, S., Murray, F., in press. Technology, organizations and institutions in the construction of economic value: the case of biotechnology. In: Griffiths, D., Phillips, N., Sewell, G. (Eds.), Research on the Sociology of Organizations, Elsevier.
- Peteraf, 1997, Getting to know you: a theory of strategic group identity, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 165, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<165::AID-SMJ914>3.3.CO;2-R · DOI
- Tripsas, 1997, Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO;2-S · DOI
- Tushman, 1992, Organizational determinants of technological-change – toward a sociology of technological evolution, Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 311
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03 · Cited by 3,138
Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search
Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0146 · Cited by 1,212
Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43669892 · Cited by 1,137
Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & FIGGE, F. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0341 · Cited by 1,082
Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008 · Cited by 948
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kaplan, Sarah
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 790-805
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124736729
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 158
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 31.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Harvard Business School
- Dartmouth College
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- technological trajectories, technology life cycle, technological frames, co-evolutionary model, dominant design, incremental change, discontinuities, technological change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
