The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Gulati, R. (1998) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::aid-smj982>3.0.co;2-m · Cited by 4,668
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164 · cited 1×
“In addition to efficient co-development of roducts and services for innovation (Gulati, 1998), networkmemers are affected by each others’ experience, yielding learning ffects for future innovation (Argote and Ingram, 2000).”
BackgroundSocial Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864
Open innovation : researching a new paradigm
Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W. P. M., & West, J. (2006) · Cited by 3,335
Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action.
Kadushin, C., Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075362 · Cited by 3,219
Hagedoorn, J. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140505 · Cited by 2,227
Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development
Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.376 · Cited by 1,941
Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004 · Cited by 966
Cited by
Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.005 · Cited by 1,121
The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004 · Cited by 1,083
Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research
Calabrò, A., Vecchiarini, M., Gast, J., Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12192 · Cited by 495
Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation
Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2013) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.004 · Cited by 470
Gronum, S., Verreynne, M.-L., & Kastelle, T. (2012) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2012.00353.x · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 290-300
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147093515
- Cited by
- 1,452
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 175.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
- The paper
- Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
