The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Collaborationamong scientistsindevelopinganddevelopedcountrieshelptheirresearchresultstogaincredibility andvisibility,improvethequalityofresearch(Osareh,2005),improvedcitations(Pohl,2020), increaseknowledgeandtechnologicaltransfer(Banal-Estañol etal. , 2015).”
From A systematic literature review of lean manufacturing implementation in manufacturing-based sectors of the developing and developed countries (2022) · cites this paper as Banal-Estañol et al., 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297968 · Cited by 33,272
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 · Cited by 22,571
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1995) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.1920/wp.ifs.1995.9517 · Cited by 14,755
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720 · cited 1×
“First, there can be a “Matthew effect” (cid:4666)Merton, 1968(cid:4667), which describes the possibility that the work of those with a higher number of publications receive greater recognition than equivalent work by those that publish less.”
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
(1968) · PubMed · Cited by 4,803
What is research collaboration?
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00917-1 · Cited by 3,134
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., et al. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 · Cited by 2,708
Toward a new economics of science
Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1 · Cited by 2,448
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–203 of 203
Border region economies: The role of proximity
Chilla, T., Paul, H., & Sommer, C. (2026) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x261483621
Fang, H., He, H., Zhang, T., & Gao, J. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10746648/v1
From resources to results: how interim outputs improve and mediate R&D output prediction
Jang, H. A. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05854-0
Metadata
- Authors
- Banal-Estañol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., & Lawson, C.
- Affiliations
- Collegio Carlo Alberto (IT)
- ORCID
- Lawson, Cornelia
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1160-1175
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144683274
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 30.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- City Research Online (City University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- City Research Online (City University London) (submittedVersion)
- Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- European Commission (266588)
- Cranfield University
- Collegio Carlo Alberto
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- university-industry collaboration, research output, engineering academics, publication rates, industry partners, curvilinear relationship, academic careers, British universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
