The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world
Open accessAbstract
The value-capture problem for innovators in the digital economy involves some different challenges from those in the industrial economy. It inevitably requires understanding the dynamics of platforms and ecosystems. These challenges are amplified for enabling technologies, which are the central focus of this article. The innovator of an enabling technology has a special business model challenge because the applicability to many downstream verticals forecloses, as a practical matter, ownership of all the relevant complements. Complementary assets (vertical and lateral) in the digital context are no longer just potential value-capture mechanisms (through asset price appreciation or through preventing exposure to monopolistic bottleneck pricing by others); they may well be needed simply for the technology to function. Technological and innovational complementors present both coordination and market design challenges to the innovator that generally lead to market failure in the form of an excess of social over private returns. The low private return leads to socially sub-optimal underinvestment in future R&D that can be addressed to some extent by better strategic decision-making by the innovator and/or by far-sighted policies from government and the judiciary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Self-citationBridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework
Gawer, A. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,869
Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005) · Handbook of Economic Growth · doi:10.1016/s1574-0684(05)01018-x · Cited by 708
Cited by
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724
Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019 · Cited by 1,060
Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4 · Cited by 945
Peng, Y., & Tao, C. (2022) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100198 · Cited by 745
Petricevic, O., & Teece, D. J. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00269-x · Cited by 501
Self-citationBurström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.016 · Cited by 424
Value creation and value capture for AI business model innovation: a three-phase process framework
Åström, J., Reim, W., & Parida, V. (2022) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-022-00521-z · Cited by 195
Cybersecurity Hazards and Financial System Vulnerability: A Synthesis of Literature
Uddin, M. H., Ali, M. H., & Hassan, M. K. (2020) · Risk Management · doi:10.1057/s41283-020-00063-2 · Cited by 141
Innovating big tech firms and competition policy: favoring dynamic over static competition
Petit, N., & Teece, D. J. (2021) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtab049 · Cited by 109
Self-citationAgarwal, S., & Kapoor, R. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1615 · Cited by 105
Next-generation business models for artificial intelligence start-ups in the healthcare industry
Kulkov, I. (2023) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-04-2021-0304 · Cited by 97
Jones, S. L., Leiponen, A., & Vasudeva, G. (2021) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3244 · Cited by 95
Collaborative innovation and human-machine networks
Kattel, R., Lember, V., & Tõnurist, P. (2020) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1645873 · Cited by 74
Soluk, J., Decker-Lange, C., & Hack, A. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122490 · Cited by 73
Khattak, A., Tabash, M. I., Yousaf, Z., Radulescu, M., Nassani, A. A., & Haffar, M. (2022) · Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jeee-08-2021-0318 · Cited by 72
How can Blockchain technology support patent management? A systematic literature review
Denter, N. M., Seeger, F., & Moehrle, M. G. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102506 · Cited by 64
The stakeholder value proposition of digital platforms in an urban ecosystem
Carrasco-Farré, C., Snihur, Y., Berrone, P., & Ricart, J. E. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104488 · Cited by 54
Hänninen, M., & Smedlund, A. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12701 · Cited by 42
Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems
Nerbel, J. F., & Kreutzer, M. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00625-8 · Cited by 37
Vertical and horizontal complementarities in platform ecosystems
Thomas, L. D. W., Ritala, P., Karhu, K., & Heiskala, M. (2025) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2024.2303593 · Cited by 34
Enabling Technologies for Ultra-Low Latency and High-Reliability Communication in 6G Networks
Mohammed, S. M., Al-Barrak, A., & Mahmood, N. T. (2024) · Ingénierie des systèmes d information · doi:10.18280/isi.290336 · Cited by 33
A Tale of Two Types of Standard Setting: Evidence From Artificial Intelligence in China
Zhang, J., Li, X., & Tong, T. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221145130 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Teece, D. J.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1367-1387
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800663167
- Cited by
- 1,767
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 129.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
