Cited by 945Digital Platforms and EconomicsDigital Economy and Work TransformationDiverse Legal and Medical Studies

Digital platform ecosystems

Open access
Hein, Andreas, Schreieck, Maximilian, Riasanow, Tobias, Setzke, David Soto, Wiesche, Manuel, Böhm, Markus, Krcmar, Helmut·2020·Electronic Markets

Abstract

Digital platforms are an omnipresent phenomenon that challenges incumbents by changing how we consume and provide digital products and services. Whereas traditional firms create value within the boundaries of a company or a supply chain, digital platforms utilize an ecosystem of autonomous agents to co-create value. Scholars from various disciplines, such as economics, technology management, and information systems have taken different perspectives on digital platform ecosystems. In this Fundamentals article, we first synthesize research on digital platforms and digital platform ecosystems to provide a definition that integrates both concepts. Second, we use this definition to explain how different digital platform ecosystems vary according to three core building blocks: (1) platform ownership, (2) value-creating mechanisms, and (3) complementor autonomy. We conclude by giving an outlook on four overarching research areas that connect the building blocks: (1) technical properties and value creation; (2) complementor interaction with the ecosystem; (3) value capture; and (4) the make-or-join decision in digital platform ecosystems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant research gaps persist in explaining the emergence of a nascent digital platform and its progression into a wide-spanning DPE.

    “Significant research gaps persist foremost in explaining the emergence of a nascent digital platform and its progression into a wide-spanning DPE.”
  • Re-occurring patterns and temporal dimensions of DPE emergence are relatively unexplored.

    “Particularly re-occurring patterns and temporal dimensions of emergence continue to be relatively unexplored.”
  • A modular platform architecture separates platform from complement development and enables complements being combined without restrictions or negative impacts on stability, functionality, or performance.

    “A modular platform architecture separates platform from complement development and enables complements being combined without restrictions or negative impacts on stability, functionality, or performance (Hein et al., 2020;Saadatmand et al., 2019).”
  • Shared platforms are owned by a consortium or a peer-to-peer community and may show different key activities in each stage or even an entirely different emergence pattern.

    “Shared platforms are, however, owned by a consortium or a peer-topeer community (Hein et al., 2020) and may show different key activities in each stage or even an entirely different emergence pattern.”
  • Complementors not only contribute to the focal platform firms' value proposition, but also actively shape the entire DPE through their actions.

    “Furthermore, it becomes evident that complementors not only contribute to the focal platform firms' value proposition, but also actively shape the entire DPE through their actions (Hein et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ebert, C., Gallardo, G., Hernantes, J., & Serrano, N. (2016). Devops. IEEE Software, 33(3), 94-100.
  2. Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform envel- opment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270-1285.
  3. Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985). Standardization, compatibility, and in- novation. The Rand Journal of Economics, 16(1), 70-83.
  4. Koh, T. K., & Fichman, M. (2014). Multi-homing users' preferences for two-sided exchange networks. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 38(4), 977-996.
  5. Zittrain, J. L. (2005). The generative internet. Harvard Law Review, 119, 1975-2039.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • TU Dortmund University (DE)
Corresponding author
Hein, Andreas
Venue
Electronic Markets
Published
2019-11-12
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
87-98
ISSN
  • 1019-6781 (ISSN-L)
  • 1422-8890
OpenAlex
W2985680329
Cited by
945
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 168 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 153 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 2
FWCI
111.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electronic Markets (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Keywords
digital platforms, digital platform ecosystems, platform ownership, value capture, value co-creation, complementors, platform business models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review