Cited by 56Behavioral and Psychological StudiesHuman Resource Development and Performance EvaluationAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Component evaluation of a computer based format for teaching discrete trial and backward chaining

Nosik, Melissa R., Williams, W. Larry·2011·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

The effectiveness of a multi-component computer based training package that consisted of competency based instructions, video modeling, and two forms of feedback was evaluated in terms of treatment integrity of two procedures across four staff. Treatment integrity in completing critical steps of discrete-trial and backward chaining procedures were measured using a multiple baseline design across participants, counterbalanced for procedures. All four participants reached 100% treatment integrity on at least one skill in a role play setting. Maintenance probes showed skills maintained at the same levels 6 weeks following training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.022

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Nosik, M. R., & Williams, W. L.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, W. Larry
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
1694-1702
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978040843
Cited by
56
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
discrete trial training, backward chaining, computer-based training, implementation fidelity, video modeling, competency-based education, feedback, employee training, skill retention, role play
MeSH terms
Adult, Competency-Based Education, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Education, Special, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Staff Development, Videotape Recording, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review