Cited by 214Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Assessing progress and outcome of early intensive behavioral intervention for toddlers with autism

MacDonald, Rebecca, Parry-Cruwys, Diana, Dupere, Sally, Ahearn, William·2014·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Intensive behavioral intervention for young children diagnosed with autism can produce large gains in social, cognitive, and language development. Although several studies have identified behaviors that are possible indicators of best outcome, changes in performance are typically measured using norm-referenced standardized scores referencing overall functioning level rather than via repeated observational measures of autism-specific deficits (i.e., social behavior). In the current study, 83 children with autism (CWA), aged 1, 2 and 3 years, and 58 same-aged typically developing children (TDC) were directly observed in the areas of cognitive skills, joint attention (JA), play, and stereotypic behavior using a measure called the Early Skills Assessment Tool (ESAT; MacDonald et al., 2006). CWA were assessed at entry into an EIBI program and again after 1 year of treatment. Changes in performance were compared pre- and post-treatment as well as to the normative data by age. Results indicate significant gains on the ESAT across all age groups with the greatest gains seen in the children who entered treatment prior to their second birthday. Increases were seen on direct measures of JA, play, imitation and language while decreases were seen in stereotypy regardless of level of performance at entry into EIBI. The ESAT, a direct measurement tool, served as a sensitive tool to measure changes in autism symptomatology following EIBI treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.036

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDonald, R., Parry-Cruwys, D., Dupere, S., & Ahearn, W.
Affiliations
New England Center for Children (US)
Corresponding author
MacDonald, Rebecca
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
35
Issue
12
Pages
3632-3644
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106906975
Cited by
214
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7
FWCI
7.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Organization for Autism Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
early intensive behavioral intervention, autism spectrum disorder, toddlers, joint attention, stereotypy, play, imitation, language development, social behavior, treatment outcomes, early intervention, typically developing children
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Attention, Autistic Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Humans, Infant, Play and Playthings, Stereotyped Behavior, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review