Cited by 84Disability Education and EmploymentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

“It’s like a ramp for a person in a wheelchair”: workplace accessibility for employees with autism

Waisman-Nitzan, Michal, Gal, Eynat, Schreuer, Naomi·2021·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Background, aims and methods Participation in employment by individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) remains restricted despite their high motivation and evident abilities. Challenges to employment result from personal characteristics and environmental barriers. This phenomenological research explores the accessibility of a competitive work environment according to the perceptions of adults with ASD. Procedures and outcomes We conducted in-depth interviews with 19 employees with ASD, followed by a thematic content analysis. Three themes emerged: (a) the employees' motivation for employment, (b) challenges and abilities at work, and (c) workplace accessibility (types of accommodations, implementation process). Results and conclusions The findings contribute a classification of accommodations that addresses the core characteristics of autism-challenges as well as abilities and motivations for employment. Four types of accommodations were identified: job-performance communication, attitudes and interpersonal communication, daily workplace routines, and physical and sensory environments. Hence, this study supports the centrality of environmental factors in successful employment of individuals with ASD. Implications This study presents an evidence-based foundation for autism-related workplace accessibility. It offers an approach to enhance employees' abilities, strengths, and motivation for employment, as well as to decrease barriers and challenges. The findings may expand organizational policies regarding accessibility and thereby anchor workplace accommodations within organizations' corporate cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103959

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waisman-Nitzan, M., Gal, E., & Schreuer, N.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Waisman-Nitzan, Michal
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
114
Pages
103959
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158266539
Cited by
84
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11
FWCI
12.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Insurance Institute of Israel
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, workplace accessibility, employment of autistic adults, workplace accommodations, environmental barriers, interpersonal communication, work routines, sensory environment, physical environment, employee motivation
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Employment, Humans, Wheelchairs, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review