Cited by 4Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFamily and Disability Support Research

Clinical and Functional Characteristics of Children and Young Adults with Cerebral Palsy and Co-Occurring Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Open access
Casseus, Myriam, Cheng, JenFu, Reichman, Nancy E.·2024·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Background Emerging research shows that children and young adults (CYAs) with cerebral palsy (CP) are at higher risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, little is known about the clinical and functional characteristics of CYAs with these co-occurring disorders.Aim To estimate associations between a diagnosis of ADHD among CYAs with CP and clinical and functional characteristics.Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from the electronic health records of CYAs (aged 4-26 years) with CP (n = 1145). We used bivariate and multivariable analyses to estimate associations between an ADHD diagnosis, CP type, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, speech or language disorder, and intellectual disability.Results 18.1 % of CYAs with CP had a diagnosis of ADHD. CYAs with spastic-bilateral CP had lower odds of ADHD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.58; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.96). Odds of having ADHD were significantly lower for those with GMFCS levels III-V (AOR = 0.10; 95 % CI, 0.06-0.15).Conclusions Our study found that a diagnosis of ADHD among CYAs with CP was associated with greater clinical and functional impairments compared to counterparts without ADHD. Findings highlight the need to screen for both conditions because of the high comorbidity rates in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104787

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children and young adults with a diagnosis of ADHD in Casseus et al.'s study were less likely to have bilateral spastic cerebral palsy compared to peers without ADHD, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.58 for those with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy.

    “Children and young adults with a diagnosis of ADHD in Casseus et al.’s study [26] were less likely to have bilateral spastic CP compared to peers without ADHD, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.58 for those with bilateral spastic CP.”
  • Several studies reported ADHD prevalence rates based on electronic health records or medical/registrar records, with reported rates of 4.1%, 18.1%, 21%, and 23%.

    “Several studies reported ADHD prevalence rates based on electronic health records or medical/registrar records, with reported rates of 4.1% [13], 18.1% [26], 21% [18], and 23% [19].”
  • Children with a Gross Motor Function Classification System level between III-V had lower odds of an ADHD diagnosis, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.10.

    “Children with a GMFCS level between III-V had lower odds of an ADHD diagnosis, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.10 [26].”
  • Children with Gross Motor Function Classification System levels III-V had a lower prevalence of ADHD compared to children with levels I-II, at 15.9% and 62.2%, respectively.

    “Children with GMFCS levels III-V, indicating more functional limitations, had a lower prevalence of ADHD compared to children with GMFCS levels of I-II, at 15.9% and 62.2%, respectively [26].”
  • Intellectual disability was associated with ADHD in Casseus et al.'s sample, and the diagnosis of ADHD was predicted by intellectual disability (odds ratio of 2.3) in another sample.

    “ID was associated with ADHD in Casseus et al.’s [26] sample, and the diagnosis of ADHD was predicted by ID (odds ratio of 2.3) in another sample [17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casseus, M., Cheng, J., & Reichman, N. E.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Casseus, Myriam
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
151
Pages
104787
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399993283
Cited by
4
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
cerebral palsy, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, comorbidities, children and young adults, Gross Motor Function Classification System, motor impairment, speech and language disorders, intellectual disability, functional disability, screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Language Disorders, Male, Intellectual Disability, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Speech Disorders, Comorbidity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review