Cited by 608Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFamily and Disability Support ResearchBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Clinical Prognostic Messages from a Systematic Review on Cerebral Palsy

Novak, Iona, Hines, Monique, Goldsmith, Shona, Barclay, Richard·2012·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize evidence on the rates of co-occurring impairments, diseases, and functional limitations with cerebral palsy into succinct clinical messages. METHODS: A search was conducted of the databases PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, and the results were supplemented with hand searches. Two independent reviewers determined whether retrieved abstracts met the following inclusion criteria: human subjects; >90% were children or adults with cerebral palsy; published after 1999; and population-based data. Articles were appraised, analyzing design, participants, level of evidence, rates of impairments, and functional implications. Methodologic quality was rated by using a standardized checklist. RESULTS: A total of 1366 papers were identified in the search; 82 were appraised and 30 were included in the meta-analyses. High-level evidence existed, as rated on the Oxford 2011 LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: 97% of prevalence studies were level 1. The data were of a moderate to high quality grade (with the exception of sleep disorders), allowing plain English clinical messages to be developed. CONCLUSIONS: Among children with cerebral palsy, 3 in 4 were in pain; 1 in 2 had an intellectual disability; 1 in 3 could not walk; 1 in 3 had a hip displacement; 1 in 4 could not talk; 1 in 4 had epilepsy; 1 in 4 had a behavior disorder; 1 in 4 had bladder control problems; 1 in 5 had a sleep disorder; 1 in 5 dribbled; 1 in 10 were blind; 1 in 15 were tube-fed; and 1 in 25 were deaf.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2012-0924

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diagnostic difficulties may be observed for children with CP who have more associated impairments, and associated functional or clinical impairment is common for children with CP.

    “Overall, diagnostic difficulties may be observed for children with CP who have more associated impairments [19], and associated functional or clinical impairment is common for children with CP [2].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Novak, I., Hines, M., Goldsmith, S., & Barclay, R.
Affiliations
Cerebral Palsy Alliance (AU)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2012-11-01
Volume
130
Issue
5
Pages
e1285-e1312
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2112624928
Cited by
608
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
cerebral palsy, comorbidities, prevalence, pain, intellectual disability, epilepsy, sleep disorders, bladder control, hip displacement, speech disorders, visual impairment, hearing loss, feeding tube dependence, functional limitations, children
MeSH terms
Cerebral Palsy, Child, Humans, Parents, Patient Education as Topic, Prognosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review