Cited by 40Advanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesAsthma and respiratory diseasesMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Volatile organic compounds associated with diagnosis and disease characteristics in asthma – A systematic review

Open access
Peel, Adam M., Wilkinson, Maxim, Sinha, Ashnish, Loke, Yoon K., Fowler, Stephen J., Wilson, Andrew M.·2020·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Background Metabolomics refers to study of the metabolome, the entire set of metabolites produced by a biological system. The application of metabolomics to exhaled breath samples - breathomics - is a rapidly growing field with potential application to asthma diagnosis and management.Objectives We aimed to review the adult asthma breathomic literature and present a comprehensive list of volatile organic compounds identified by asthma breathomic models.Methods We undertook a systematic search for literature on exhaled volatile organic compounds in adult asthma. We assessed the quality of studies and performed a qualitative synthesis.Results We identified twenty studies; these were methodologically heterogenous with a variable risk of bias. Studies almost universally reported breathomics to be capable of differentiating - with moderate or greater accuracy - between samples from healthy controls and those with asthma; and to be capable of phenotyping disease. However, there was little concordance in the compounds upon which discriminatory models were based.Conclusion Results to-date are promising but validation in independent prospective cohorts is needed. This may be challenging given the high levels of inter-individual variation. However, large-scale, multi-centre studies are underway and validation efforts have been aided by the publication of technical standards likely to increase inter-study comparability. Successful validation of breathomic models for diagnosis and phenotyping would constitute an important step towards personalised medicine in asthma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105984

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Beale DJ, Karpe AV, Ahmed W. Beyond Metabolomics: A Review of Multi-Omics-Based Approaches. Microbial Metabolomics: Springer; 2016. p. 289-312.
  2. van der Schee MP, Fens N, Brinkman P, Bos LD, Angelo MD, Nijsen TM, et al. Effect of transportation and storage using sorbent tubes of exhaled breath samples on diagnostic accuracy of electronic nose analysis. Journal of breath research. 2013;7(1):016002.
  3. Couto M, Barbosa C, Silva D, Rudnitskaya A, Delgado L, Moreira A, et al. Exhaled breath metabolomics to investigate exercise-induced oxidative stress and asthma in elite swimmers. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2015;70:645-6.
  4. Lionel B, Agnieszka S, Agnieszka B, Ettje T, Morris S, Alexandra Z, et al. Factors that influence the volatile organic compound content in human breath. Journal of breath research. 2017.
  5. Covington J, der Schee Mv, Edge A, Boyle B, Savage R, Arasaradnam R. The application of FAIMS gas analysis in medical diagnostics. The Analyst. 2015;140(20):6775-81.
  6. Sumner LW, Amberg A, Barrett D, Beale MH, Beger R, Daykin CA, et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis. Metabolomics. 2007;3(3):211-21.
  7. Fens N, Van De Pol MA, Brinkman P, Gerritsen MG, Bos LDJ, Dekker T, et al. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath of asthma patients differ between loss of control and stable phase. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Conference: American Thoracic Society International Conference, ATS. 2015;191(no pagination).
  8. Brinkman P, Ahmed W, Gomez C, Knobel H, Weda H, Vink T, et al., editors. Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds as Markers for Medication Use in Asthma Within the U-BIOPRED Cohort. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine; 2018: Amer Thoracic Soc 25 Broadway, 18 Fl, New York, NY 10004 USA.
  9. Amal H, Leja M, Funka K, Skapars R, Sivins A, Ancans G, et al. Detection of precancerous gastric lesions and gastric cancer through exhaled breath. 2016;65(3):400-7.
  10. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC bioinformatics. 2011;12(1):77.
  11. Brinkman P, Wagener A, Knobel H, Vink A, Rattray N, Fowler S, et al. Unbiased cluster analysis of severe asthma based on metabolomics by the U-BIOPRED electronic nose platform. European Respiratory Journal Conference: European Respiratory Society Annual Congress. 2013;42(no pagination).
  12. Brinkman P, Wang Y, Hashimoto S, Weda H, Knobel HH, Vink TJ, et al. Exhaled breath volatile organic compounds can classify asthma patients with high and low sputum eosinophils. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Conference: American Thoracic Society International Conference, ATS. 2015;191(no pagination).
  13. Santini G, Di Carlo S, Benso A, Mores N, Brinkman P, Valente S, et al. Breathomics can discriminate between anti IgE-treated and non-treated severe asthma adults. European Respiratory Journal Conference: European Respiratory Society Annual Congress. 2015;46(no pagination). 111. Van Der Schee MP, Liley J, Palmay R, Cowan J, Taylor D. Predicting steroid responsiveness in patients with asthma using the electronic nose -abstract. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Conference: American Thoracic Society International Conference, ATS. 2012;185(no pagination). 112.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peel, A. M., Wilkinson, M., Sinha, A., Loke, Y. K., Fowler, S. J., & Wilson, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Peel, Adam M.
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
169
Pages
105984
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025271774
Cited by
40
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research
  • University of East Anglia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
asthma, exhaled breath, volatile organic compounds, breathomics, metabolomics, asthma diagnosis, asthma phenotyping, biomarkers, personalized medicine, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Asthma, Breath Tests, Female, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Volatile Organic Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review