Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There has been disagreement regarding whether users may truly form relationships with artificial companions.
“There has also been some disagreement regarding whether users may truly form relationships with artificial companions (De Graaf & Allouch, 2013;Konok et al., 2018).”
From A longitudinal study of human–chatbot relationships (2022) · cites this paper as De Graaf & Allouch, 2013
The study of anthropomorphism within the CASA paradigm has suggested generally positive effects.
“The study of anthropomorphism within the CASA paradigm has suggested generally positive effects (de Graaf & Allouch, 2013).”
From Building a Stronger CASA: Extending the Computers Are Social Actors Paradigm (2020) · cites this paper as de Graaf & Allouch, 2013
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035 · see citing works
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925 · see citing works
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666 · see citing works
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Behavioral control Bandura [56] 10 10 4.”
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664 · see citing works
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726 · see citing works
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As people feel the need to control their environment, those who feel uncertain are more likely to anthropomorphize a social robot as it helps then to explain, control and predict the behavior of a nonhuman agent [37].”
BackgroundToward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
Vallerand, R. J. (1997) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2 · Cited by 3,198 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The dichotomy of utilitarian and hedonic factors as determinants of technology acceptance also arises from motivation theory which suggests a main classification of motivators based on the different reasons or goals people have that encourages the performance of an activity [14,15].”
BackgroundA survey of socially interactive robots
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x · Cited by 3,162 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Being familiar with robots has profound effects on the manner in which people perceive the robot’s accessibility, desirability and expressiveness [22].”
BackgroundInfluentialExtending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/506724.506730 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human–robot interaction
Kanda, T., Sato, R., Saiwaki, N., & Ishiguro, H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2007.904904 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building a Stronger CASA: Extending the Computers Are Social Actors Paradigm
Gambino, A., Fox, J., & Ratan, R. (2020) · Human-Machine Communication · doi:10.30658/hmc.1.5 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
“The study of anthropomorphism within the CASA paradigm has suggested generally positive effects (de Graaf & Allouch, 2013).”
Backgroundde Graaf, M. M. A., Allouch, S. B., & Klamer, T. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Self-citationA longitudinal study of human–chatbot relationships
Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102903 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
“There has also been some disagreement regarding whether users may truly form relationships with artificial companions (De Graaf & Allouch, 2013; Konok et al., 2018).”
BackgroundA Pilot Randomized Trial of a Companion Robot for People With Dementia Living in the Community
Liang, A., Piroth, I., Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Fisher, M., Nater, U. M., Skoluda, N., & Broadbent, E. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.019 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Lee, J.-G., Kim, K. J., Lee, S., & Shin, D.-H. (2015) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070547 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Odekerken-Schröder, G., Mele, C., Russo-Spena, T., Mahr, D., & Ruggiero, A. (2020) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2020-0148 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Socially Assistive Robots as Mental Health Interventions for Children: A Scoping Review
Kabacińska, K., Prescott, T. J., & Robillard, J. M. (2021) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00679-0 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly
Di Nuovo, A., Broz, F., Wang, N., Belpaeme, T., Cangelosi, A., Jones, R., Esposito, R., Cavallo, F., & Dario, P. (2018) · Intelligent Service Robotics · doi:10.1007/s11370-017-0237-6 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Socially Assistive Robots: Measuring Older Adults' Perceptions
Beuscher, L. M., Fan, J., Sarkar, N., Dietrich, M. S., Newhouse, P. A., Miller, K. F., & Mion, L. C. (2017) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/00989134-20170707-04 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Tuisku, O., Pekkarinen, S., Hennala, L., & Melkas, H. (2019) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-06-2018-0277 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Olde Keizer, R. A. C. M., van Velsen, L., Moncharmont, M., Riche, B., Ammour, N., Del Signore, S., Zia, G., Hermens, H., & N’Dja, A. (2019) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-019-00320-9 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
McGinn, C., Bourke, E., Murtagh, A., Donovan, C., Lynch, P., Cullinan, M. F., & Kelly, K. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10846-019-01051-9 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Having the Right Attitude: How Attitude Impacts Trust Repair in Human—Robot Interaction
Esterwood, C., & Robert, L. P. (2022) · 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889535 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Louie, B., Björling, E. A., & Kuo, A. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.566909 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Operators' Experience of Trust in Manual Assembly with a Collaborative Robot
Nordqvist, M., & Lindblom, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction · doi:10.1145/3284432.3287180 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Parental Expectations, Concerns, and Acceptance of Storytelling Robots for Children
Lin, C., MacDorman, K. F., Šabanović, S., Miller, A. D., & Brady, E. (2020) · Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3371382.3378376 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S.
- Venue
- Robotics and Autonomous Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1476-1486
- ISSN
- 0921-8890 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010060754
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Robotics and Autonomous Systems (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- social robots, technology acceptance, user acceptance, utilitarian factors, hedonic factors, perceived usefulness, adaptability, enjoyment, sociability, companionship, perceived behavioral control, user characteristics, home robots, human-robot interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
