Cited by 115Social Robot Interaction and HRIDigital Mental Health InterventionsHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Socially Assistive Robots as Mental Health Interventions for Children: A Scoping Review

Kabacińska, Katarzyna, Prescott, Tony J., Robillard, Julie M.·2021·International Journal of Social Robotics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12369-020-00679-0

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of conversational agents was predominantly investigated in relation to a broad range of mental health problems, or specifically related to cognitive and social abilities, without considering the emotional component of mental health.

    “Moreover, use of CAs was predominantly investigated in relation to a broad range of mental health problems15,16, or specifically related to cognitive and social abilities, without considering the emotional component of mental health24,25.”

    From Use of automated conversational agents in improving young population mental health: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction distinguishes earlier social-robot research on social and cognitive skills from the mental-health-specific outcomes this review examines. But the source reviews socially assistive robots in children, not conversational agents generally, and it reports studies measuring affect and other emotional outcomes (Section 3.2.2). It therefore does not support the unqualified assertion that the emotional component was not considered. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous reviews limited their focus to a subset of conversational agents based on the embodiment level.

    “Third, the previous reviews limited their focus to a subset of CAs based on the embodiment level, such as disembodied CAs13,20, CAs with virtual representation15, or with a physical representation23–25.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [39]39. Jeong S, Breazeal C, Logan D, Weinstock P (2018) Huggable: The Impact of Embodiment on Promoting Socio-emotional Interactions for Young Pediatric Inpatients. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 495:1 -495:13
  2. [51]51. Eind R, Heerink M (2018) Evaluation of the use of a Pleo robot at a child consultation clinic. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social Robots in Therapy and Education. Panama, pp 41-43
  3. [64]64. Costescu CA, David DO (2014) Attitudes toward Using Social Robots in Psychotherapy. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology 15:3 -20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kabacińska, K., Prescott, T. J., & Robillard, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Robillard, Julie M.
Venue
International Journal of Social Robotics
Published
2020-07-27
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
919-935
ISSN
  • 1875-4791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-4805
OpenAlex
W3046158298
Cited by
113
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
12.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • AGE-WELL
  • BC Children’s Hospital Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
socially assistive robots, child mental health, robot-assisted intervention, pediatric mental health care, childhood anxiety, stress reduction, positive affect, distress reduction, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review