CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 342Power Systems and Renewable EnergyHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wind powered pumped hydro storage systems, a means of increasing the penetration of renewable energy in the Canary Islands

Bueno, C., Carta, J.A.·2006·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.005

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Mansoor S. Behaviour and operation of pumped storage hydro plants. PhD Thesis. Bangor, UK: University of Wales; 2000.
  2. Conejo AJ. Optimal reservoir utilization of pumped hydro storage plants in probabilistic production costing models intended for generation expansion planning. PhD Thesis. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Electric Power Systems, Royal Institute of Technology; 1990.
  3. Kuan T. Basic planning analysis of pumped-storage. PhD Thesis. Colorado, USA: Civil Engineering Department, State University; 1989.
  4. Chen PI, Garg VK. Wind energy and pumped water storage in the Pacific Northwest. In: Proceedings of annual ASME symposium on energy alternatives, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; 1976. p. 225–6.
  5. Lilly PN, Radovich M, Warshauer J. Improving California wind project dispatchability and firm capacity: coupling modular pumped-storage hydroelectric technology with wind power; siting, utility integration and regulatory issues. In: Proceedings of the American wind energy association conference wind power 91. Palm Springs, CA, USA; 1991. p. 28–35.
  6. Lilly PN, Rashkin S. The economic viability of modular pumped-storage hydroelectric/wind systems within California markets. In: Proceedings of the American wind energy association conference wind power 93. San Francisco, CA, USA; 1993. p. 251–7.
  7. Chabot B. A long term wind power prospect from hydropower retrospect and prospect: scenarios and lessons. In: Proceedings of wind power for the 21st Century. Kassel, Germany; 2000. p. 19–22.
  8. Liao TL, Peng SM, Hsu JM, Yang JC, Liu H. The Chi Mei wind energy demonstration project. In: Proceedings of sixth biennial wind energy conference and workshop. Minneapolis, MN; 1983. p. 899–903.
  9. Neil LC, Takahashi PK, Neill DR. A research program for wind energy utility interface concern. In: ASME fourth wind energy symposium. Dallas, USA; 1985. p. 69–74.
  10. Adair RA, Finch JW. The renewable energy system at Earth balance. In: Proceedings of the 18th British wind energy association conference. Exeter University, UK; 1997. p. 247–51.
  11. Somerville WM, Grylls W, Nicholson GD, Watson GR, Jepson MD. Foula wind-pump-hydro system, the development of a control strategy. Project Nr 512/85 UK. In: Proceedings of wind-diesel and wind autonomous energy systems conference. Mykonos, Greece; 1988. p. 162–73.
  12. Somerville WM. Wind turbine and pumped storage hydro generation on Foula. In: Proceeding of the European wind energy conference. Glasgow, UK; 1989. p. 713–17.
  13. Bollmeier WS, Huang N, Trenka AR. Wind/pumped-hydro integration and test project: preliminary system test results. In: Proceedings of the American society of mechanical engineers. New Orleans, LA, USA; 1994. p. 103–10.
  14. Mikhail, 1981, Comparison of height extrapolation models and sensitivity analysis, Wind Eng, 5, 91
  15. RD 2818. Electrical energy production from installations supplied by renewable, residual and cogenerative energy resources. Royal Decree, Spanish Official State Bulletin 312 (BOE 312). Wednesday 30 December, 1998 [in Spanish].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 342

Related

Metadata

Authors
Bueno, C., & Carta, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Tecnológico de Canarias (ES)
  • Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
Corresponding author
Carta, J.A.
ORCID
Carta, J.A.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
312-340
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.005
OpenAlex
W2092996627
Cited by
342
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Power Systems and Renewable Energy
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Keywords
renewable energy penetration, Canary Islands, Gran Canaria, island power systems, wind power integration, energy costs, CO2 emission reduction, fossil fuel savings, externalities, grid stability, renewable energy policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review