Cited by 312Forest Biomass Utilization and ManagementBioenergy crop production and managementBioeconomy and Sustainability Development

Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: Availability and distribution

Jiang, Dong, Zhuang, Dafang, Fu, Jinying, Huang, Yaohuan, Wen, Kege·2012·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.012

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • China has approximately 130 million hectares of farmland.

    “China is one of the largest agricultural countries in the world and has approximately 130 million hectares (Mha) farmland, yielding above 600 million tons (Mt) of crop residues, which is the potential biofuel production feedstock (Jiang et al. 2012;Liu et al.et al. 2012;Sang and Zhu 2011).”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Jiang et al. 2012

  • Crop residues are a potential biofuel production feedstock.

    “China is one of the largest agricultural countries in the world and has approximately 130 million hectares (Mha) farmland, yielding above 600 million tons (Mt) of crop residues, which is the potential biofuel production feedstock (Jiang et al. 2012;Liu et al.et al. 2012;Sang and Zhu 2011).”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Jiang et al. 2012

  • China yields above 600 million tons of crop residues.

    “China is one of the largest agricultural countries in the world and has approximately 130 million hectares (Mha) farmland, yielding above 600 million tons (Mt) of crop residues, which is the potential biofuel production feedstock (Jiang et al. 2012;Liu et al.et al. 2012;Sang and Zhu 2011).”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Jiang et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, D., Zhuang, D., Fu, J., Huang, Y., & Wen, K.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jiang, Dong
  • Zhuang, Dafang
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
1377-1382
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150362887
Cited by
311
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
24.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Keywords
crop residues, bioenergy potential, crop straw, spatial distribution, GIS-based assessment, transportation costs, energy planning, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review