Cited by 164Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Competing uses for China's straw: the economic and carbon abatement potential of biochar

Open access
Clare, Abbie, Shackley, Simon, Joseph, Stephen, Hammond, James, Pan, Genxing, Bloom, Anthony·2015·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

Abstract China is under pressure to improve its agricultural productivity to keep up with the demands of a growing population with increasingly resource‐intensive diets. This productivity improvement must occur against a backdrop of carbon intensity reduction targets, and a highly fragmented, nutrient‐inefficient farming system. Moreover, the Chinese government increasingly recognizes the need to rationalize the management of the 800 million tonnes of agricultural crop straw that China produces each year, up to 40% of which is burned in‐field as a waste. Biochar produced from these residues and applied to land could contribute to China's agricultural productivity, resource use efficiency and carbon reduction goals. However competing uses for China's straw residues are rapidly emerging, particularly from bioenergy generation. Therefore it is important to understand the relative economic viability and carbon abatement potential of directing agricultural residues to biochar rather than bioenergy. Using cost‐benefit analysis (CBA) and life‐cycle analysis (LCA), this paper therefore compares the economic viability and carbon abatement potential of biochar production via pyrolysis, with that of bioenergy production via briquetting and gasification. Straw reincorporation and in‐field straw burning are used as baseline scenarios. We find that briquetting straw for heat energy is the most cost‐effective carbon abatement technology, requiring a subsidy of $7 MgCO2e−1 abated. However China's current bioelectricity subsidy scheme makes gasification (NPV $12.6 million) more financially attractive for investors than both briquetting (NPV $7.34 million), and pyrolysis ($−1.84 million). The direct carbon abatement potential of pyrolysis (1.06 MgCO2e per odt straw) is also lower than that of briquetting (1.35 MgCO2e per odt straw) and gasification (1.16 MgCO2e per odt straw). However indirect carbon abatement processes arising from biochar application could significantly improve the carbon abatement potential of the pyrolysis scenario. Likewise, increasing the agronomic value of biochar is essential for the pyrolysis scenario to compete as an economically viable, cost‐effective mitigation technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcbb.12220

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shackley SJ, Clare AJ, Joseph S, McCarl BA, Schmidt H-P (in press) Chapter 31: eco- nomic evaluation of biochar systems: current evidence and challenges. In: Biochar for Environmental Management (eds Lehmann J, Joseph S). Earthscan, London, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clare, A., Shackley, S., Joseph, S., Hammond, J., Pan, G., & Bloom, A.
Affiliations
  • Scotland's Rural College (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
  • Kunming Institute of Botany (CN)
Corresponding author
Clare, Abbie
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-29
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
1272-1282
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2097034345
Cited by
164
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department for International Development
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
biochar, bioenergy, straw gasification, carbon abatement, economic feasibility, straw burning, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review