A literature-based multi-criteria evaluation of the EU ETS
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There appears to be no significant negative effects of the EU ETS on firm-level competitiveness during Phase I and II.
“However, there appears to be no significant negative effects of the EU ETS on firm-level competitiveness during Phase I and II as documented by the empirical ex post literature (Arlinghaus, Citation2015; Martin et al., Citation2016; Venmans, Citation2012).”
From Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms' competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature (2019) · cites this paper as Venmans, 2012
Cites
On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,791 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Weitzman [70] shows that if the structural uncertainty surrounding climate change induces a critical ‘‘tail fattening’’ of the probability density function of climate damage, these extreme risks may outweigh the effects of discounting in climate policy analysis.”
BackgroundEU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis
PONSSARD, J. P., & WALKER, N. (2008) · Climate Policy · doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0500 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses
Green, J. F. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1502145 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
“However, there appears to be no significant negative effects of the EU ETS on firm-level competitiveness during Phase I and II as documented by the empirical ex post literature (Arlinghaus, 2015; Martin et al., 2016; Venmans, 2012).”
BackgroundBeyond Carbon Pricing: Tax Reform is Climate Policy
Green, J. F. (2021) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12920 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Market Stability Reserve under exogenous shock: The case of COVID-19 pandemic
Azarova, V., & Mier, M. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116351 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Venmans, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Mons (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Venmans, Frank
- ORCID
- Venmans, Frank
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5493-5510
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008057223
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 17.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- ORBi UMONS (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
- Keywords
- EU Emissions Trading System, carbon pricing, multi-criteria decision making, carbon leakage, over-allocation, cost-effectiveness, free allocation, equity, institutional feasibility, carbon tax, climate policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
