Cited by 35Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEU Law and Policy AnalysisCOVID-19 impact on air quality

Market Stability Reserve under exogenous shock: The case of COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Azarova, Valeriya, Mier, Mathias·2021·Applied Energy

Abstract

The EU implemented the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) in response to the 2008 financial crisis to deal with short-term impacts of future shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We link a model that intertemporally optimizes the handling of banked allowances every five years with one that simulates the annual working of the EU ETS including the MSR with its potential cancelling. Neglecting the pandemic, 2.16 billion allowances are cancelled. Accounting for the pandemic, 0.28 billion additional allowances are cancelled if the European economy fully recovers by 2021, which even overcompensates the 2020 drop in CO2 emissions. Additional cancelling increases when the pandemics lasts longer, meaning that the MSR even outperforms its initial purpose. Thus, we conclude that no additional policy measures to support abatement are required in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116351

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EU ETS is being put to the test by three large shocks: a temporary negative allowance demand shock from COVID-19 lockdowns, a positive or negative allowance demand change from the NextGenerationEU recovery stimulus package, and a permanent negative allowance supply adjustment from the EU's more ambitious EU ETS emissions reduction target of 61% by 2030 compared to 2005 levels.

    “The European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), a cornerstone of EU climate policy, is being put to the test by three large shocks affecting the demand for or supply of emission allowances: a temporary negative allowance demand shock because COVID-19 lockdowns reduced energy demand1–3, a positive or negative allowance demand change because of overlapping policies from the NextGenerationEU”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azarova, V., & Mier, M.
Affiliations
Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE)
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
283
Pages
116351
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113027267
Cited by
35
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (020E100374092))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › COVID-19 impact on air quality
Keywords
Market Stability Reserve, EU Emissions Trading System, COVID-19 pandemic, carbon allowances, external shocks, CO2 emissions, climate policy, 2008 financial crisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review