The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of validation methodologies and statistical performance indicators for modeled solar radiation data: Towards a better bankability of solar projects
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Liew, M. W. V., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23153 · Cited by 13,446
Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram
Taylor, K. E. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd900719 · Cited by 8,477
Willmott, C., & Matsuura, K. (2005) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr030079 · Cited by 6,512
Willmott, C. J. (1981) · Physical Geography · doi:10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213 · Cited by 4,916
Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation
Legates, D. R., & McCabe, G. J. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900018 · Cited by 4,591
Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance
Willmott, C. J. (1982) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:scoteo>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,736
Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences
Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.263.5147.641 · Cited by 3,010
Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models
Willmott, C. J., Ackleson, S. G., Davis, R. E., Feddema, J. J., Klink, K. M., Legates, D. R., O'Donnell, J., & Rowe, C. M. (1985) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/jc090ic05p08995 · Cited by 2,026
The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation
Technical Committee on Standardization of Reference Evapotranspiration (2005) · American Society of Civil Engineers eBooks · doi:10.1061/9780784408056 · Cited by 1,437
Cited by
Golafshani, E. M., Behnood, A., & Arashpour, M. (2020) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117266 · Cited by 478
A current perspective on the accuracy of incoming solar energy forecasting
Blaga, R., Sabadus, A., Stefu, N., Dughir, C., Paulescu, M., & Badescu, V. (2019) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2018.10.003 · Cited by 267
PV power forecast using a nonparametric PV model
Almeida, M. P., Perpiñán, O., & Narvarte, L. (2015) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2015.03.006 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Gueymard, C. A.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 39
- Pages
- 1024-1034
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168087114
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 16.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of validation methodologies and statistical performance indicators for modeled solar radiation data: Towards a better bankability of solar projects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.117
- The paper
- Gueymard, C. A. (2014). A review of validation methodologies and statistical performance indicators for modeled solar radiation data: Towards a better bankability of solar projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
