The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration
Open accessAbstract
Currently, the energy grid is changing to fit the increasing energy demands but also to support the rapid penetration of renewable energy sources. As a result, energy storage devices emerge to add buffer capacity and to reinforce residential and commercial usage, as an attempt to improve the overall utilization of the available green energy. Although various research has been conducted in the field including photovoltaic and wind applications, the study on suitability identification of different storage devices for various stationary application types is still the gap observed which needs further study and verification. The review performed fills these gaps by investigating the current status and applicability of energy storage devices, and the most suitable type of storage technologies for grid support applications are identified. Moreover, various technical, economic and environmental impact evaluation criteria's are taken into consideration for the identification of their characteristics and potentials. The comprehensive review shows that, from the electrochemical storage category, the lithium-ion battery fits both low and medium-size applications with high power and energy density requirements. From the electrical storage categories, capacitors, supercapacitors, and superconductive magnetic energy storage devices are identified as appropriate for high power applications. Besides, thermal energy storage is identified as suitable in seasonal and bulk energy application areas. With proper identification of the application's requirement and based on the techno-economic, and environmental impact investigations of energy storage devices, the use of a hybrid solutions with a combination of various storage devices is found to be a viable solution in the sector.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Luo, X., Wang, J., Dooner, M., & Clarke, J. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.081 · Cited by 3,869
Progress in electrical energy storage system: a critical review
Chen, H., Cong, T. N., Yang, W., Tan, C., Li, Y., & Ding, Y. (2009) · Progress in Natural Science · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.07.014 · Cited by 3,746
A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Energy Storage
Sarbu, I., & Sebarchievici, C. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010191 · Cited by 1,311
Applications of lithium-ion batteries in grid-scale energy storage systems
Chen, T., Jin, Y., Lv, H., Yang, A., Liu, M., Chen, B., Xie, Y., & Chen, Q. (2020) · Transactions of Tianjin University · doi:10.1007/s12209-020-00236-w · Cited by 692
Cited by
Liu, Z., Sun, Y., Xing, C., Liu, J., He, Y., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, G. (2022) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100195 · Cited by 288
Combined “Renewable Energy–Thermal Energy Storage (RE–TES)” Systems: A Review
Elkhatat, A., & Al-Muhtaseb, S. A. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16114471 · Cited by 100
Zhou, Y. (2024) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.113688 · Cited by 42
Du, K., Zhang, D., Zhang, S., & Tam, K. C. (2024) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202304739 · Cited by 28
Wolters, L., & Brusselaers, J. (2024) · The Extractive Industries and Society · doi:10.1016/j.exis.2024.101498 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Kebede, A. A., Kalogiannis, T., Van Mierlo, J., & Berecibar, M.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 159
- Pages
- 112213
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4211006056
- Cited by
- 1,213
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 44.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112213
- The paper
- Kebede, A. A., Kalogiannis, T., Van Mierlo, J., & Berecibar, M. (2022). A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.