Cited by 93Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Structure-based prediction of protein allostery

Open access
Greener, Joe G, Sternberg, Michael JE·2018·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

Allostery is the functional change at one site on a protein caused by a change at a distant site. In order for the benefits of allostery to be taken advantage of, both for basic understanding of proteins and to develop new classes of drugs, the structure-based prediction of allosteric binding sites, modulators and communication pathways is necessary. Here we review the recently emerging field of allosteric prediction, focusing mainly on computational methods. We also describe the search for cryptic binding pockets and attempts to design allostery into proteins. The development and adoption of such methods is essential or the long-preached potential of allostery will remain elusive.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.002

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Allosteric modulators can change protein/substrate affinity in a highly predictable manner by stabilizing target proteins in inactive or active state, leading to desirable controllability.

    “Allosteric modulators can change the protein/substrate affinity in a highly predictable manner by stabilizing target proteins in an inactive or active state, leading to desirable controllability.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ: Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001, 46:3-26.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greener, J. G., & Sternberg, M. J.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Greener, Joe G
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
50
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766298563
Cited by
91
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J014575/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
protein allostery, allosteric modulators, cryptic binding pockets, structure-based drug design, computational methods
MeSH terms
Allosteric Regulation, Allosteric Site, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins, Software, Computational Biology, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review