CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Stress and Burnout ResearchHealth, psychology, and well-beingOccupational Health and Burnout

The impact of cognitive behavioral interventions on SOC, perceived stress and mood states of nurses

Open access
Sarid, Orly, Berger, Rivka, Segal-Engelchin, Dorit·2010·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.128
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Health care professionals are prone to continuous stress due to their occupational demands. Occupational stress is defined as a response to chronic job-related stress characterized by physical and emotional exhaustion and stress related disorders. Very few studies have examined the impact of cognitive behavioral interventions (CBI), including information provision and education on stress reactions among nurses. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of CBI on nurses’ sense of coherence (SOC), perceived stress, and mood states. A pre-post test design, with control, was chosen in order to meet the aims of the study. Participants consisted of thirty-six registered nurses. Nurses were recruited from all hospital wards by snowballing technique. Twenty nurses comprised the CBI group (study-group). A control group of sixteen nurses were matched by terms of age, education, and marital status. The psychological measures of the two groups were compared at baseline (t1) and did not differ with regard to their SOC, perceived stress, and mood states. Effect of group on psychological measure was carried out by analysis of covariance. The pre-post effects within each group controlling for t1 showed that in the CBI group, a statistically significant change was found in four of the psychological measures: the values of SOC and vigor mood state increased, while values of perceived stress and fatigue mood state significantly decreased at t2. No such changes were observed in the control-group. The results are discussed in the conceptual frame of stress and coping theory. Recommendations for health professionals’ education are suggested.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.128

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because cognitive behavioral therapy focuses on modifying dysfunctional cognitions and promoting appropriate coping behaviors, it can be especially effective for addressing the stress experienced by nurses.

    “As cognitive behavioral therapy focuses on modifying dysfunctional cognitions and promoting the adoption of appropriate behaviors for coping with stress and emergent situations, it can be especially effective for addressing the stress experienced by nurses (Brunero et al., 2008; Orly et al., 2010).”

    From Reducing nurses' stress: A randomized controlled trial of a web-based stress management program for nurses (2016) · cites this paper as Orly et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hirokawa, K., Yagi, A., & Miyata, Y. (2002). An examination of the effects of stress management training for Japanese college students of social work. International Journal of Stress Management, 9(2), 113-123.
  2. Jacobson E. (1938). Progressive relaxation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Judkins, S., Furlow, L., & Kendricks, T. (2007). A training program was conducted to reduce stress and enhance hardiness among nurses. Nursing Management, 14(7), 19-23.
  4. Sarid, O., Anson, O., Schwartz, D., & Yaari, A. (2008). Anti Hsp70 antibodies, cortisol and psychological factors: a pilot study. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences & Practice. 6(4), 1-9.
  5. Sarid, O., Segal-Engelchin, D., & Bitan, O. (2008). Implications of a cognitive behavioral group interventions and peer social group on adolescence and young adults with cerebral palsy: a pilot study. International Journal of Disability, Community & Rehabilitation, 7(2).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Sarid, O., Berger, R., & Segal-Engelchin, D.
Affiliations
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Soroka Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Sarid, Orly
ORCID
Sarid, Orly
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
928-932
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.128
OpenAlex
W1970110498
Cited by
27
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
cognitive-behavioral intervention, sense of coherence, perceived stress, mood states, nurses, occupational stress, stress and coping theory, fatigue, vigor, health professions education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review