Cited by 70Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychological and Educational Research Studies

Relationship between Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation for Learning – Researches Review

Open access
Jovanovic, Dragana, Matejevic, Marina·2014·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

In this paper, we review some of the initial researches, conducted during the 70's and later, about the potential role of external rewards on intrinsic motivation for learning. This is considered from different theoretical approaches such as self-determination theory, cognitive approach, attribution theory, general interest theory, behaviorist approach. The review is divided into three parts. Firstly, we review researches related to the effect of external reward on reducing internal motivation for learning and some research which is opposite to them. Secondly, we discuss the benefits of motivation for improving creative achievements. Thirdly, a significant part of this paper refers to analyzing the interests, as a part of students’ intrinsic motivation, which are not given enough attention in literature. Finally, we draw conclusions from the researches review. In the summary, analyzing these early researches, we can say that there is a good evidence that rewards have a strong influence on the students’ motivation for learning and high creative outcomes which is opposite to some initial researches (although this depends on the type of undertaking rewards). Considering these early researches indicates that producing negative effects requires combining specific conditions that are not characteristic for activities in everyday life, especially in school life and the idea that rewards disturb intrinsic motivation of individual requires a more detailed analysis. We believe that rewards are not harmful, which is proved by some researches, and that there is a certain interrelation between external motivators and task-oriented motivation which is confirmed by the cognitive approach. Future researches should be oriented towards the examination of the impact of different types of interests on learning and the variety of personal motives, examining the interactions between motivation and cognitive constructs, but also on how to develop personal interests and motivational constructs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.287

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been indications that reward for participation in psychological studies may negatively influence participants and their motivation to engage with the task at hand.

    “There have been indications that reward for participation in psychological studies may negatively influence participants and motivation to engage with the task at hand (Jovanovic & Matejevic, 2014;Sharp, Pelletier, & Levesque, 2006).”

    From When ‘negativity’ becomes obstructive: a novel exploration of the two-factor model of the Self-Compassion Scale and a comparison of self-compassion and self-criticism interventions (2020) · cites this paper as Jovanovic & Matejevic, 2014

    Section 2 reports a slight decrease in time spent on a task after a reward was given for participating in that task, and discusses possible reductions in intrinsic motivation. It does not establish that rewards for participating in psychological studies have this effect; that is a different condition from rewarding participation in the task itself. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. (1994). Reinforcement, reward and intrinsic motivation: Protests and accusations do not alter the results. Review of Educational Research, 66, 39-52.
  2. Deci, E. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
  3. Eisenberger, R., Pierce, W. D., & Cameron, J. (1999). Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation: Negative, neutral, and positive. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 677-691.
  4. Kruglanski, A. (1975). The endegenous-exognous partition in attribution theory. Psychological Review, 82, No 2, 387-406.
  5. Sternberg, R. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jovanovic, D., & Matejevic, M.
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
149
Pages
456-460
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030305656
Cited by
70
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja (179002, 179074)
  • Science and Engineering Research Board
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
extrinsic rewards, intrinsic motivation, student motivation, self-determination theory, attribution theory, behaviorism, creativity, student interest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review