When ‘negativity’ becomes obstructive: a novel exploration of the two-factor model of the Self-Compassion Scale and a comparison of self-compassion and self-criticism interventions
Open accessAbstract
Background: Self-compassion is a tendency to respond to personal feelings of distress in a kind and understanding way, and to become aware that facing difficulties and adversity is part of a common human experience that is shared by all hu-mans. The Self Compassion Scale (SCS) includes negative items measuring self-judgement, isolation and over-identification, which are at the opposite end of the spectrum to self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness. Some researchers have argued that the link between self-compassion and psychopathology is inflated by the inclu-sion of these negative items. Moving away from factorial structures and advanced statistics used in recent research, we present a different way of exploring the conceptualisation of self-compassion theory and the way it is measured. Participants and procedure: Study 1 set out to support the inclusion (or exclusion) of the negative items within the SCS, by investigating the cor-relation between the negative items and the positive items altered to reflect the exact opposite of the original posi-tive items of the scale (i.e., self-unkindness, disjointed humanity, and mindlessness). Study 2 was an experiment exploring differences between self-compassion and self-criticism 5-minute interventions on state self-compassion, state mindfulness and state anxiety. The interventions were separated to represent the positive or negative ele-ments, rather than a mixture of the interventions. Results: If the main argumentation against the use of the overall score of the self-compassion scale is the inflation of the neg-ative items, then the results support the inclusion of the negative items within the SCS, as the altered positive items show a similar inflation to the original negative items when observing a significant positive relationship. No differ-ences were found between the two interventions and the overall scores; nevertheless, mindfulness and self-judgment subscales appeared to significantly change only for the self-compassion group. Conclusions: While the debate around the self-compassion scale continues, the literature emphasizing self-criticism does not translate into inflation as suggested, and does not propose effective practices. Explanations of findings, limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In two studies, reversing the SCS positive items produced negative items that correlated strongly with the original negative items, supporting inclusion of negative SCS items, while a brief self-compassion intervention and a self-criticism-reduction intervention did not differ overall on state self-compassion, mindfulness, or anxiety. Subscale analyses showed mindfulness and self-judgment changed significantly only in the self-compassion condition.
Key findings
- Study 1: original positive subscales correlated negatively with original negative subscales (r = -.69, n = 155, p < .001) and with altered negative subscales (r = -.68, p < .001); original negative and altered negative subscales correlated positively (r = .72, p < .001).
- Study 2: no significant intervention effects on state mindfulness, state self-compassion, or state anxiety; Time × Group ANOVAs were non-significant for these overall measures (e.g., state mindfulness F = 0.34, p = .565; state self-compassion F = 2.03, p = .158; state anxiety F = 0.15, p = .697).
- State anxiety decreased significantly in the self-compassion condition (pre 12.63 to post 11.38, ΔM = -1.25, t = 2.16, p = .037) but only marginally in the self-criticism condition (pre 11.25 to post 10.30, ΔM = -0.95, t = 1.89, p = .067).
- Subscale follow-ups: mindfulness increased significantly only in the self-compassion condition (t(78) = 2.99, ΔM = -1.00, p = .004; criticism condition t(78) = 0.82, ΔM = 0.27, p = .413), and self-judgment decreased significantly only in the self-compassion condition (t(78) = 3.16, ΔM = 1.60, p = .002; criticism condition t(78) = 0.53, ΔM = 0.53, p = .304). Isolation, common humanity, and self-kindness changed similarly in both conditions.
Methods
- Study 1: correlational design; 155 undergraduate students from a university in England (141 females, 14 males; mean age 20.56, SD = 2.86); completed the original 26-item SCS plus 13 altered negative items created by reversing positive SCS items; Pearson correlations compared original positive, original negative, and altered subscales.
- Study 2: experimental pre-post design; 80 psychology undergraduates (76 females, 4 males; mean age 21.66, SD = 5.07), allocated to a 5:11 Self-Compassion Break or a 5:21 Eliminating Self-Criticism Break (40 per condition); state self-compassion, state mindfulness, and state anxiety measured before and after.
- Main analysis: three 2 (Condition) × 2 (Time) mixed ANOVAs on overall state self-compassion, state mindfulness, and state anxiety, plus similar analyses on SCS subscales and follow-up repeated-measures t-tests.
Limitations
- Stated: recruitment through a university Research Participation Scheme with credits may negatively influence participants and motivation; Study 2 priming was undermined because all participants were psychology undergraduates and over 80% reported familiarity with self-compassion, making understanding more similar across conditions than intended; future research should use a pre-intervention knowledge test and larger samples.
- Stated: Study 2 used short interventions; future research could test longer meditation durations, though prolonged self-criticism-reduction interventions may be ethically problematic.
- Evident in text: both samples were predominantly female undergraduates from one university, limiting generalizability; outcomes relied on self-report state measures, and Study 2 had no follow-up beyond immediate post-intervention.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
7 of 26 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The present findings are consistent with the systematic review and meta-analysis finding that self-compassion interventions improve self-compassion and psychopathology but not over and beyond other interventions.
“Conversely, the findings could be explained through a recent systematic review and meta-analysis that highlighted selfcompassion interventions improving self-compassion and psychopathology, but not over and beyond other interventions (Wilson, Mackintosh, Power, & Chan, 2019), which is consistent with the present findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilson, Mackintosh, Power, & Chan, 2019 source
- Findingown data
In the Compassion Condition, state isolation was significantly reduced from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 2.54, ΔM = 1.05, p = .013.
“For the Compassion Condition, isolation was significantly reduced from pre-to post-intervention measurements, t(78) = 2.54, ΔM = 1.05, p = .013.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Compassion Condition, state self-judgment significantly decreased from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 3.16, ΔM = 1.60, p = .002.
“Similarly, self-judgment significantly decreased for the Compassion Condition, t(78) = 3.16, ΔM = 1.60, p = .002”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Compassion Condition, state Self-Kindness significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 5.62, ΔM = -2.37, p < .001.
“Self-Kindness for the Compassion Condition displayed a significant increase t(78) = 5.62, ΔM = -2.37,p < .001”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 2, the mindfulness and self-judgment subscales appeared to significantly change only for the self-compassion group.
“nevertheless, mindfulness and selfjudgment subscales appeared to significantly change only for the self-compassion group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
In the Criticism Condition, state Common Humanity significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 2.14, ΔM = -0.92, p = .035.
“and the same was true for the Criticism Condition t(78) = 2.14, ΔM = -0.92,p = .035.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the Criticism Condition, state Self-Kindness significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 6.32, ΔM = -2.67, p < .001.
“and a similar increase was observed for the Criticism Condition t(78) = 6.32,ΔM = -2.67,p < .001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 1, there was a strong negative correlation between original positive (O+) and altered (A) subscales of the Self-Compassion Scale (r = -.68, n = 155, p < .001).
“a strong negative correlation between O+ and A subscales (r = -.68,n = 155, p < .001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 1, there was a strong positive correlation between original negative (O-) and altered (A) subscales of the Self-Compassion Scale (r = .72, n = 155, p < .001).
“a strong positive correlation between O-and A subscales (r = .72,n = 155, p < .001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 1, there was a strong negative correlation between original positive (O+) and original negative (O-) subscales of the Self-Compassion Scale (r = -.69, n = 155, p < .001).
“There was a strong negative correlation between O+ and O-subscales (r = -.69,n = 155, p < .001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Criticism Condition, state mindfulness showed a non-significant decrease from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 0.82, ΔM = 0.27, p = .413.
“while the Criticism Condition displayed a non-significant decrease, t(78) = 0.82, ΔM = 0.27, p = .413.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study 1 found a strong positive correlation between the original negative subscale of the SCS and the altered subscale (positive items rephrased as their polar opposites).
“the study found a strong positive correlation between the original negative subscale of the SCS and the altered subscale”
- Also stated in: § discussion · boosted
“The current study showed a strong correlation between the negative items and reversed-positive items”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § discussion · boosted
- Findingown data
In the Criticism Condition, state isolation was significantly reduced from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 3.39, ΔM = 1.40, p = .001.
“Similarly, for the Criticism Condition, isolation was significantly reduced from pre-to post-intervention measurements, t(78) = 3.39, ΔM = 1.40, p = .001.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the Criticism Condition, state self-judgment showed a non-significant decrease from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 0.53, ΔM = 0.53, p = .304.
“while the Criticism Condition displayed a non-significant decrease, t(78) = 0.53, ΔM = 0.53, p = .304.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Compassion Condition, state mindfulness significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 2.99, ΔM = -1.00, p = .004.
“For mindfulness, the Compassion Condition displayed a significant increase t(78) = 2.99, ΔM = -1.00,p = .004”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Compassion Condition, state Common Humanity significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention, t(78) = 3.25, ΔM = -1.40, p = .002.
“Common Humanity for the Compassion Condition displayed a significant increase t(78) = 3.25, ΔM = -1.40,p = .002”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 2, there were similar outcomes in increasing self-compassion, state mindfulness and in decreasing state anxiety across conditions.
“However, there were similar outcomes in increasing self-compassion, state mindfulness and in decreasing state anxiety (see Tables 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Follow-up analyses of the subscales revealed significant differences between conditions in self-judgment and mindfulness.
“Follow-up analyses into the subscales revealed that there were significant differences in self-judgment and mindfulness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
State anxiety showed a marginal significance of a higher reduction for the self-compassion intervention than for the self-criticism intervention.
“although state anxiety showed a marginal significance of a higher reduction for the self-compassion (over the self-criticism) intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Study 1 found a strong negative correlation between the original positive subscale of the SCS and the altered subscale.
“In addition, a strong negative correlation between the original positive subscale and the altered subscale was observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The main analyses showed no significant difference between the self-compassion and self-criticism interventions across all measures used, apart from a marginal difference in state anxiety.
“The main analyses showed no significant difference between the two interventions across all measures used, apart from a marginal difference in state anxiety.”
- Also stated in: § discussion · plain
“The analysis showed no significant difference between the interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § discussion · plain
- Premisecitation
The two-factor model of the Self-Compassion Scale has not been confirmed in other research.
“Then again, the two-factor model has not been confirmed in other research (e.g., Cleare, Gumley, Cleare, & O'Conner, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cleare et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Self-criticism components indicate significant maladaptive elements across different clinical conditions.
“self-criticism components indicate significant maladaptive elements across different clinical conditions (e.g., Dunkey & Grilo, 2007;Rosenfarb, Becker, Khan, & Mintz, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dunkey & Grilo, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Rosenfarb et al., 1998 source
- Premisecitation
Suppressing thoughts and emotions, which often comes with attempts to change thoughts, typically leads to a paradoxical increase, rather than a decrease, of thoughts and emotions.
“suppressing thoughts and emotions, which often comes with attempts to change thoughts, typically leads to a paradoxical increase, rather than a decrease of thoughts and emotions (Beevers, Wenzlaff, Hayes, & Scott, 1999;Dalgleish, Yiend, Schweizer, & Dunn, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The therapeutic benefits of the self-compassion intervention have been evident in several studies.
“the therapeutic benefits of the selfcompassion intervention, which has been evident in several studies (Albertson, Neff, & Dill-Shackleford, 2015;Diedrich, Hofmann, Cuijpers, & Berking, 2016;Johnson & O'Brien, 2013;Mosewich, Crocker, Kowalski, & DeLongis, 2013;Neff, 2016a;Odou & Brinker, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
This work, alongside existing research, strengthens the rationale for use of the SCS in its current form in Study 1.
“Limitations notwithstanding, this work, alongside existing research, strengthens the rationale for use of the SCS in its current form in Study 1, but Study 2 may need further consideration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
People more generally perceive the negative items of the SCS as the exact opposite of the positive ones.
“This research suggests that people more generally perceive the negative items as the exact opposite to the positive ones, by exploring the relationship between positive items that were altered and the controversial original negative items.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The altered subscale, formed by rephrasing the positive SCS items as their exact polar opposites, validly represents the content of the original negative SCS items.
- Interpretationown data
The findings support the notion that telling people to be less critical of themselves is not the best solution.
“The findings of the current study are not straightforward, but do support the notion that telling people to be less critical of themselves is not the best solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The contribution or inflation of the negative items of the SCS is not much more than that of positive items rephrased.
“In essence, the contribution or inflation of the negative items is not much more than that of positive items rephrased.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The altered subscale, formed by rephrasing the positive SCS items as their exact polar opposites, validly represents the content of the original negative SCS items.
- Interpretationown data
Study 2 is not as supportive of the psychometric properties of the SCS when considering an intervention developed strictly based on the positive items.
“In essence, the second study is not as supportive of the psychometric properties when considering an intervention that was developed strictly based on the positive items.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The negative components of the SCS are simply the opposites of the positive components.
“suggesting that the negative components are simply the opposites of the positive components”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The altered subscale, formed by rephrasing the positive SCS items as their exact polar opposites, validly represents the content of the original negative SCS items.
- Interpretationreasoning
Participants' understanding of self-compassion was more similar across conditions than the design of Study 2 intended.
“This means that their understanding of the concept was more similar across conditions than the design of the study intended.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The exact opposite to the positive items is equivalent to the original negative items of the SCS.
“The present research uniquely contributed to the present literature by indicating that the exact opposite to the positive items, which is seen in most psychometric tools (e.g., Baer et al., 2008;Lee & Ashton, 2004), is equivalent to the original negative items.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- Rests on an assumption: The altered subscale, formed by rephrasing the positive SCS items as their exact polar opposites, validly represents the content of the original negative SCS items.
- Interpretationown data
The intervention aimed at reducing self-criticism performed worse than the self-compassion intervention.
“Again, these findings bare more significance when considering that one of the interventions aimed at reducing self-criticism, and performed worse than the self-compassion intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The significance of the differences between the two interventions was limited to state self-compassion, state mindfulness and state anxiety.
“This means that the significance was limited when exploring the differences in the effectiveness of state self-compassion, state mindfulness and state anxiety.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The use of negative items within the SCS is acceptable.
“the current study indicates that the use of negative items within the SCS is acceptable”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The altered subscale, formed by rephrasing the positive SCS items as their exact polar opposites, validly represents the content of the original negative SCS items.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
- May combine two claims. 31
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearchers have suggested that the negative items of the Self-Compassion Scale correlate more with psychopathology, leading to the conclusion that positive and negative items should be investigated separately because the negative items inflate the relationships observed.
“Specifically, researchers suggested that the negative items correlate more with psychopathology, which led them to the conclusion that positive and negative items should be investigated separately, as the negative items inflate the relationships observed (López et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites López et al., 2015 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that self-compassion interventions improve self-compassion and psychopathology, but not over and beyond other interventions.
“a recent systematic review and meta-analysis that highlighted selfcompassion interventions improving self-compassion and psychopathology, but not over and beyond other interventions (Wilson, Mackintosh, Power, & Chan, 2019)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilson, Mackintosh, Power, & Chan, 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere have been indications that reward for participation in psychological studies may negatively influence participants and their motivation to engage with the task at hand.
“There have been indications that reward for participation in psychological studies may negatively influence participants and motivation to engage with the task at hand (Jovanovic & Matejevic, 2014;Sharp, Pelletier, & Levesque, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Jovanovic & Matejevic, 2014 source
Section 2 reports a slight decrease in time spent on a task after a reward was given for participating in that task, and discusses possible reductions in intrinsic motivation. It does not establish that rewards for participating in psychological studies have this effect; that is a different condition from rewarding participation in the task itself. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Sharp, Pelletier, & Levesque, 2006 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious research indicated that positive and negative items within the SCS represent separate concepts, because negative items have a stronger association with psychopathology.
“Previous research indicated that positive and negative items within the scale represent separate concepts, because negative items have a stronger association with psychopathology (e.g.López et al., 2018;Muris & Petrocchi, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe culture of the West teaches people to associate self-compassion with passivity or weakness and to confuse the concept with self-indulgence or self-pity, rather than a healthier perspective of oneself able to battle psychopathology.
“The culture of the West teaches people to associate self-compassion with passivity or weakness and to confuse the concept with self-indulgence or self-pity, rather than a healthier perspective of oneself that is able to battle psychopathology (Egan & Mantzios, 2018;Mantzios & Egan, 2017;Neff & Dahm, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Egan & Mantzios, 2018 source
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that participants associated self-kindness with self-indulgence, and the Introduction says self-kindness can alleviate psychological distress. The paper does not establish that Western culture teaches people to see self-compassion as weakness or passivity, nor does it address confusion with self-pity or a general ability to combat psychopathology. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Mantzios & Egan, 2017 source
The ‘Differentiating between self-compassion and self-kindness’ section (page unavailable) says people confuse self-compassion with self-kindness and describes indulgent acts that some people consider kind to themselves. It does not say Western culture teaches this confusion or associates self-compassion with passivity, weakness, or self-pity. The paper discusses alleviating psychological distress, but does not make the claimed point about battling psychopathology. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Neff & Dahm, 2015 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Study 2, the effects of the intervention on state mindfulness, state self-compassion, and state anxiety were non-significant.
“The analyses revealed that the effects of the intervention on state mindfulness, on state selfcompassion, and on state anxiety were non-significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Study 2, state anxiety appeared to reach significance in the Self-Compassion Condition, while the Self-Criticism Condition marginally failed.
“although state anxiety appeared to reach significance in the Self-Compassion Condition, while the Self-Criticism Condition marginally failed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Study 2, there were no significant differences between the intervention types and between genders at baseline measurements.
“There were no significant difference between the intervention types and between genders at baseline measurements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor isolation, Common Humanity and Self-Kindness, there were no differences between the Compassion and Criticism Conditions.
“Up to this point, there were no differences between the two conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth interventions decreased state self-judgment, but the decrease was significant only for the self-compassion intervention, not for the self-criticism intervention.
“With self-judgment, both interventions decreased self-judgment, but the selfcompassionate intervention decreased self-judgment significantly, while the self-criticism intervention did not reach significance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe second hypothesis was confirmed, but not to the extent that was expected.
“The second hypothesis was also confirmed, but not to the extent that was expected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth interventions were equally effective at increasing overall state self-compassion and state mindfulness and decreasing state anxiety scores.
“Both interventions were equally effective at increasing the overall state self-compassion and state mindfulness and decreasing state anxiety scores”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataState mindfulness significantly increased in the self-compassion intervention while decreasing non-significantly in the self-criticism intervention.
“Mindfulness significantly increased in the self-compassion intervention, while decreasing in the self-criticism, non-significantly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe Self-Compassion Scale appears to be an appropriate measure as suggested by Neff (2003b), because the observed relationships between original positive, original negative, and altered subscales were as predicted.
“The SCS appears to be an appropriate measure as suggested by Neff (2003b), as the relationships appeared to be as predicted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Neff (2003b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results support the inclusion of the negative items within the Self-Compassion Scale, because the altered positive items show a similar inflation to the original negative items when observing a significant positive relationship.
“If the main argumentation against the use of the overall score of the self-compassion scale is the inflation of the negative items, then the results support the inclusion of the negative items within the SCS, as the altered positive items show a similar inflation to the original negative items when observing a significant positive relationship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataPreliminary analysis in Study 2 showed no violation of assumptions (Levene's test of equality of error variances > .05 and Box's test of equality of covariance matrices > .001).
“Preliminary analysis showed no violation of assumptions (i.e., Levene's test of equality of error variances > .05 and Box's test of equality of covariance matrices > .001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataIn Study 1, the Cronbach's α for the original Self-Compassion Scale was .95.
“In the current study the Cronbach's α was .95.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Study 2, the State Anxiety Inventory - Short Form had a Cronbach's α of .87 prior to intervention and .88 after intervention.
“The scale was administered both prior to (Cronbach's α = .87)and after intervention (Cronbach's α = .88)to measure the changes in anxiety of participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe self-compassion and self-criticism interventions do not differ in the way they influence state self-compassion, state mindfulness and state anxiety, although state anxiety appeared to reach significance in the Self-Compassion Condition while the Self-Criticism Condition marginally failed.
“Therefore, the self-compassion and self-criticism interventions do not differ in the way they influence state self-compassion, state mindfulness and state anxiety, although state anxiety appeared to reach significance in the Self-Compassion Condition, while the Self-Criticism Condition marginally failed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe literature emphasizing self-criticism does not translate into inflation as suggested, and does not propose effective practices.
“While the debate around the self-compassion scale continues, the literature emphasizing self-criticism does not translate into inflation as suggested, and does not propose effective practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTóth-Király et al. (2017) examined the factor structure in a large international investigation of 20 samples (N = 11,685), where each sample provided support for the use of the original six subscales and the total SCS score, but not the two-factor model.
“Tóth-Király et al. (2017) examined the factor structure in a large international investigation of 20 samples (N = 11,685), where each sample provided support for the use of the original six subscales and the total SCS score, but not the two-factor model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tóth-Király et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSuppression leads to more thoughts and more distress, while acceptance of thoughts leads to fewer thoughts, as well as lower levels of depression and anxiety.
“research has indicated that suppression leads to more thoughts and more distress, while acceptance of thoughts leads to fewer thoughts, as well as lower levels of depression and anxiety (Marcks & Woods, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marcks & Woods, 2005 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Study 2, gender differences were explored, and data were reanalysed by excluding males, and similar comparisons were performed with (un)familiarity of self-compassion and experiences in meditation, all of which indicated the same pattern or non-significant differences.
“Gender differences were explored, and data were reanalysed by excluding males, and similar comparisons were performed with (un)familiarity of self-compassion and experiences in meditation, all of which indicated the same pattern or non-significant differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataIn Study 1, the Cronbach's α for the altered self-compassion negative sub-scales was .84.
“In the current study the Cronbach's α was .84.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenEthical approval for Study 1 was provided by the university's Psychology Department Ethics Committee.
“Ethical approval for this study was provided by the university's Psychology Department Ethics Committee.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Study 2, the State Mindfulness Scale had a Cronbach's α of .95 prior to intervention and .95 after intervention.
“This scale was used to measure participants' awareness of present experiences prior to (Cronbach's α = .95)and after intervention (Cronbach's α = .95).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Study 2, every second participant was allocated to the self-criticism condition, and each condition consisted of 40 participants.
“Every second participant was allocated to the self-criticism condition, and each condition consisted of 40 participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenEthical approval for Study 2 was provided by the university's Psychology Department Ethics Committee.
“Ethical approval for this study was provided by the university's Psychology Department Ethics Committee.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Study 2, the state self-compassion scale had a Cronbach's α of .88 prior to intervention and .83 after intervention.
“This scale was used to measure state self-compassion of participants prior to (Cronbach's α = .88)and after intervention (Cronbach's α = .83).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataPreliminary analysis in Study 1 showed that all assumptions were met to conduct a bivariate correlation.
“Preliminary analysis showed that all assumptions were met to conduct a bivariate correlation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe Self-Compassion Scale appears to represent a valid construct, although replication of the present findings is warranted.
“For now, it appears as if the self-compassion scale represents a valid construct, although replication of the present findings is warranted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataIn Study 1, the Cronbach's α for the combined scale was .95.
“In the current study the Cronbach's α was .95 for the combined scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe inclusion of the negative components of the Self-Compassion Scale for the reduction of response bias appears appropriate, given the significant positive relationship between altered and original negative items and the significant negative relationships between original positive items and both original negative and altered items.
“Specifically, the inclusion of the negative components for the reduction of response bias appears appropriate, as there is a significant positive relationship between A items and O-items, and the O+ items significantly relate negatively to both O-and A, a relationship that appears marginally the same.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWithout follow-up investigations, the conclusion that can be drawn from Study 2 is only that the positive item intervention brings about positive changes to both positive and negative factors, but not over and beyond what would be expected.
“Without any follow-up investigations, the conclusion that can be drawn from Study 2 may only be that the positive item intervention brings about positive changes to both positive and negative factors, but not over and beyond what would be expected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNegative and positive components of the SCS, while opposites that relate differently to other constructs, are interrelated parts of an overall concept of self-compassion.
“Study 1 supports the understanding that while negative and positive components might be opposites and relate differently to other constructs, they are interrelated parts of an overall concept of self-compassion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The altered subscale, formed by rephrasing the positive SCS items as their exact polar opposites, validly represents the content of the original negative SCS items.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll participants were psychology undergraduates, and over 80% reported being familiar with the concept of self-compassion.
“However, all of the participants were psychology undergraduates, and over 80% of the participants reported being familiar with the concept of self-compassion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFrom an ethical viewpoint, the use of decreasing self-criticism for prolonged periods and interventions may be problematic.
“although from an ethical viewpoint the use of decreasing self-criticism for prolonged periods and interventions may be problematic, and was therefore explored in this short format.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
PremisecitationPeople from Western civilisation relate more easily to the negative components of self-compassion than to the positive ones.
“For example, researchers have claimed that people from Western civilisation relate more easily to the negative components of self-compassion than the positive ones (Neff & Dahm, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Neff & Dahm, 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe stronger association of negative SCS items with psychopathology could be explained by factors other than negative components being more predictive of psychopathology.
“However, this could be explained by factors other than negative components being more predictive of psychopathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSelf-compassion has been conceptualised as more than simply a lack of self-criticism.
“Self-compassion has been conceptualised as more than simply a lack of self-criticism (Warren, Smeets, & Neff, 2016)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Warren, Smeets, & Neff, 2016
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationcitationCultural and clinical factors could contribute to the stronger link between negative SCS items and psychopathology.
“This could contribute to the stronger link between negative items and psychopathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMindfulness is the primary construct of initiating compassion for self and others, as it assists in identifying when there is suffering and the need to enable the appropriate compassionate response.
“Considering mindfulness to be the primary construct of initiating compassion for self and others, as it assists identifying when there is suffering, and the need to enable the appropriate compassionate response”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPeople struggling with mental health, such as those showing symptoms of depression, find the concept of self-compassion difficult to practise and components of self-compassion difficult to experience.
“In addition, people struggling with mental health, such as those who show symptoms of depression, find the concept of self-compassion difficult to practise and components of self-compassion difficult to experience (Pauley & McPherson, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pauley & McPherson, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningBoth studies relied on a university Research Participation Scheme, which rewards participants with credits, to recruit participants.
“Both studies relied on a Research Participation Scheme within the university to recruit participants, which is based on rewarding participants with credits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Non-significant differences in outcomes (self-compassion, mindfulness and anxiety) between the two interventions would partially suggest that the effectiveness rests on both negative and positive items.
“We assumed that non-significant differences in outcomes (i.e., self-compassion, mindfulness and anxiety) between the two interventions would partially suggest that the effectiveness rests on both negative and positive items.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The positive and negative items of the Self-Compassion Scale are polar opposites.
“if we were to assume that the positive and negative items are polar opposites, we would expect that both self-compassion and self-criticism reduction interventions would influence all self-compassion subscales similarly”
The paper relies on this without support.
The altered subscale, formed by rephrasing the positive SCS items as their exact polar opposites, validly represents the content of the original negative SCS items.
“whether we are talking about the much debated negative items or the positive items rephrased (to represent negative items -i.e., the exact polar opposites), there seems to be an overly high association”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Claimed self-judgment difference is not supported by the group comparison
MajorThe text says the follow-up analyses found a significant difference in self-judgment, but Table 3 reports a non-significant Time × Group effect for self-judgment (p = .138). A significant change in one condition but not the other does not itself establish a difference between conditions.
“Follow-up analyses into the subscales revealed that there were significant differences in self-judgment and mindfulness.”
“| Self-Judgment | 1, 78 | 8.79 | .004 | 2.25 | .138 | 0.97 | .328 |”
Claimed greater anxiety reduction conflicts with the interaction test
MinorThe discussion describes a marginally greater anxiety reduction under self-compassion than under self-criticism. Table 1 reports the Time × Group test for state anxiety as p = .697, which does not support even a marginal difference in reductions.
“although state anxiety showed a marginal significance of a higher reduction for the self-compassion (over the self-criticism) intervention.”
“| State Anxiety | 1, 78 | 8.21 | .005 | 0.15 | .697 | 0.15 | .697 |”
Cites
The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Self-Compassion
NEFF, K. D. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309027 · Cited by 6,436 · see citing works
Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude Toward Oneself
NEFF, K. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309032 · Cited by 5,440 · see citing works
Marteau, T. M., & Bekker, H. (1992) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x · Cited by 3,238 · see citing works
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Walsh, E., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191107313003 · Cited by 2,930 · see citing works
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8 · Cited by 1,961 · see citing works
The Self-Compassion Scale is a Valid and Theoretically Coherent Measure of Self-Compassion
Neff, K. D. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0479-3 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Self-Compassion: What It Is, What It Does, and How It Relates to Mindfulness
Neff, K. D., & Dahm, K. A. (2015) · Handbook of Mindfulness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2263-5_10 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Albertson, E. R., Neff, K. D., & Shackleford, K. E. (2014) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0277-3 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Muris, P., & Petrocchi, N. (2017) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2005 · Cited by 498 · cited 7× · see citing works
“…of self-compassion (see Mantzios & Egan, 2017; Egan & Mantzios, 2018 for review), but the negative components may represent a separate concept, especially when exploring literature that has outlined the association between self-compassion and psychopathology (Muris, Otgaar, & Petrocchi, 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialState Mindfulness Scale (SMS): Development and initial validation.
Tanay, G., & Bernstein, A. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0034044 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
A Reconsideration of the Self-Compassion Scale’s Total Score: Self-Compassion versus Self-Criticism
López, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., van Sonderen, E., Ranchor, A., & Schroevers, M. J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132940 · Cited by 380 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Specifically, researchers suggested that the negative items correlate more with psychopathology, which led them to the conclusion that positive and negative items should be investigated separately, as the negative items inflate the relationships observed (López et al., 2015).”
BackgroundWilliams, M. J., Dalgleish, T., Karl, A., & Kuyken, W. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0035566 · Cited by 321 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…1, 78 0.99 .322 1.39 .243 1.44 .233 296 current issues in personality psychology six-factor model (Castilho, Pinto-Gouveia, & Duarte, 2015; Williams et al., 2014), the overall self-compassion score (Neff et al., 2018), and the two-factor model (Costa et al., 2015; Toth-Kiraly et al.,…”
InfluentialEffectiveness of Self-Compassion Related Therapies: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Wilson, A. C., Mackintosh, K., Power, K., & Chan, S. W. Y. (2019) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-018-1037-6 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Costa, J., Marôco, J., Pinto‐Gouveia, J., Ferreira, C., & Castilho, P. (2016) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.1974 · Cited by 289 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…model (Castilho, Pinto-Gouveia, & Duarte, 2015; Williams et al., 2014), the overall self-compassion score (Neff et al., 2018), and the two-factor model (Costa et al., 2015; Toth-Kiraly et al., 2017), the current study indicates that the use of negative items within the SCS is acceptable.”
BackgroundApplying Self-Compassion in Sport: An Intervention With Women Athletes
Mosewich, A. D., Crocker, P. R. E., Kowalski, K. C., & DeLongis, A. (2013) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.35.5.514 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Neff, K. D., Whittaker, T. A., & Karl, A. (2017) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1269334 · Cited by 266 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Neff, Whittaker, and Karl (2017) argued for another statistical approach that was more considerate of multiple and overall scores in psychometric scales, and in this case, more appropriate for the SCS. Tóth-Király, Bőthe, and Orosz (2017) further argued that an alternative statistical approach (as…”
ResultJohnson, E. A., & O'Brien, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2013.32.9.939 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Pauley, G., & McPherson, S. (2009) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1348/147608309x471000 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Neff, K. D., Long, P., Knox, M. C., Davidson, O., Kuchar, A., Costigan, A., Williamson, Z., Rohleder, N., Tóth-Király, I., & Breines, J. G. (2018) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2018.1436587 · Cited by 234 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in personality psychology six-factor model (Castilho, Pinto-Gouveia, & Duarte, 2015; Williams et al., 2014), the overall self-compassion score (Neff et al., 2018), and the two-factor model (Costa et al., 2015; Toth-Kiraly et al., 2017), the current study indicates that the use of…”
BackgroundCastilho, P., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Duarte, J. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22187 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Marcks, B. A., & Woods, D. W. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.03.005 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Dunkley, D. M., & Grilo, C. M. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.01.017 · Cited by 164 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…components of the scale are consistent with the caring aspects someone would expect in any theory of self-compassion (see Mantzios & Egan, 2017; Egan & Mantzios, 2018 for review), but the negative components may represent a separate concept, especially when exploring literature that has…”
BackgroundDiedrich, A., Hofmann, S. G., Cuijpers, P., & Berking, M. (2016) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.04.003 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Muris, P., & Otgaar, H. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01363-0 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Neff, K. D. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0531-y · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Muris, P., Otgaar, H., & Petrocchi, N. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0509-9 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Breines, J. G., & Chen, S. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.015 · Cited by 119 · cited 5× · see citing works
“The original Self-Compassion Scale (Neff, 2003b).”
InfluentialBeevers, C. G., Wenzlaff, R. M., Hayes, A. M., & Scott, W. D. (1999) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.6.2.133 · Cited by 116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The findings relate to previously explored literature, where predictions were based on the assumption of suppression and the paradoxical effect (Beevers et al., 1999; Marcks & Woods, 2005; Dalgleish et al., 2009) of “over-identifying”, but the reality is that there should have been more significant findings.”
ResultExploring the Relationship between Rumination, Self-compassion, and Mood
Odou, N., & Brinker, J. K. (2013) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2013.840332 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
An Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Self-Compassion Scale
Cleare, S., Gumley, A. I., Cleare, C. J., & O’Connor, R. C. (2017) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0803-1 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
A Close Examination of the Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Depressive Symptoms
López, A., Sanderman, R., & Schroevers, M. J. (2018) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-018-0891-6 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Ironic effects of emotion suppression when recounting distressing memories.
Dalgleish, T., Yiend, J., Schweizer, S., & Dunn, B. D. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0017290 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Tsal, Y., & Makovski, T. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.351 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…be the best way to purposefully provide guidance, as there is the possibility of enhancing suppression, control, judgment and failure (e.g., Tsal & Makovski, 2006) without the all-important acceptance and non-judgmental aspects of self-compassion (i.e., self-kindness, mindfulness and common…”
BackgroundThe Influence of Self-Compassion on Cognitive Appraisals and Coping with Stressful Events
Chishima, Y., Mizuno, M., Sugawara, D., & Miyagawa, Y. (2018) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-018-0933-0 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of the Self-Compassion Scale
Tóth‐Király, I., Bőthe, B., & Orosz, G. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0662-1 · Cited by 76 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Study 1 provides an alternative method of examining the question about the factor structure and the overall score of the SCS. Based on the debate around the two-factor model, we took the positive subscale items of the SCS and rephrased them to create self-unkindness, disjointed humanity, and mindlessness, and explored…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRelationship between Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation for Learning – Researches Review
Jovanovic, D., & Matejevic, M. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.287 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
On the Role of Self-compassion and Self-kindness in Weight Regulation and Health Behavior Change
Mantzios, M., & Egan, H. H. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00229 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationSetting the Record Straight About the Self-Compassion Scale
Neff, K. D. (2018) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-018-1061-6 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While Neff (2019) attempted to support the original factor structure in more recent literature, the debate continues (Muris & Otgaar, 2020), and this research aimed to provide an alternative assessment to such debate.”
ResultThe double-edged sword of rewards for participation in psychology experiments.
Sharp, E. C., Pelletier, L. G., & Lévesque, C. (2006) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/cjbs2006014 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Dependency and self‐criticism in bipolar and unipolar depressed women
Rosenfarb, I. S., Becker, J., Khan, A., & Mintz, J. (1998) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01398.x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
(2016) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Egan, H., & Mantzios, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00880 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationAllen, A. B., Robertson, E., & Patin, G. A. (2017) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260517734858 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Shahabi, B., Shahabi, R., & Foroozandeh, E. (2019) · International Journal of Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1080/20473869.2019.1573000 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neff, K. D., & Tóth‐Király, I. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_36-1 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Rakhimov, A., Realo, A., & Tang, N. K. Y. (2022) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2022.2093731 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Furthermore, only a self-compassion but not a self-criticism intervention was found effective in lowering people’s levels of self-judgement (Mantzios et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-Compassion: Theory and Measurement
Neff, K. D. (2023) · Mindfulness in behavioral health · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-22348-8_1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Buz, J., Crego, A., Bernabé, J. R. Y., Zaballos, E. S., & Bartol, A. A. (2022) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-022-01917-4 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Neff, K. D., & Tóth‐Király, I. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47219-0_36 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Per, M., Schmelefske, E., Bouchard, S., & Khoury, B. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07868-y · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Cook, A., Keyte, R., Sprawson, I., Matharu, A., & Mantzios, M. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1393314/v1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationCook, A., Keyte, R., Sprawson, I., Matharu, A., & Mantzios, M. (2024) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-024-00962-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…in crisis can access support networks (e.g., supervisory support through colleagues), MHFAers—who are arguably exposed to similarly distressing situations despite being equipped with less experience and training—do not have a clear support network or supervisory support (Mantzios et al. 2020).”
Self-citationKrok, D., Telka, E., & Skalski‐Bednarz, S. B. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14134696 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Although the original model of self-compassion by Neff [3,31] conceptualizes it as a unified construct with interrelated subscales, recent studies [32–34] have supported a two-factor structure distinguishing between positive and negative dimensions.”
The Self-Compassionate Path to Self-Forgiveness: Self-Kindness Enhances and Isolation Inhibits
Toussaint, L. L., Uram, P., Surżykiewicz, J., & Skalski‐Bednarz, S. B. (2025) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941251400657 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-compassion and reasons individuals stop eating: An exploratory investigation
Hussain, M., Dunsmore, N., Ung, L., & Mantzios, M. (2024) · Nutrition and Health · doi:10.1177/02601060241266387
“Furthermore, implications for interventions may pose a question of looking at self-compassion differently, for example, Mantzios et al. (2020) found that a self-compassion intervention (focusing on positive items of self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness from the self-compassion scale…”
Self-citationStiles, B. J., Fraser, M. I., Gleeson, J., Álvarez‐Jiménez, M., & Penn, D. L. (2026) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2026.07.023
- Authors
- Mantzios, M., Koneva, A., & Egan, H.
- Affiliations
- Birmingham City University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mantzios, Michail
- Venue
- Current Issues in Personality Psychology
- Publisher
- Termedia Sp. z.o.o.
- Published
- 2020-11-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 289-300
- ISSN
- 2353-4192 (ISSN-L)
- 2353-561X
- OpenAlex
- W3120535904
- Semantic Scholar
- 48f55aef2fe71e50e5f5468a46b001f501a5f395
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Current Issues in Personality Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- self-compassion, Self-Compassion Scale, two-factor model, self-criticism, self-kindness, self-judgment, scale validity, mindfulness, anxiety, self-compassion interventions, psychopathology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-18.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review