Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy: A systematic review and meta-regression of global and regional trends from the 1970s to 2009

Open access
Gallego, Juan A., Bonetti, John, Zhang, Jianping, Kane, John M., Correll, Christoph U.·2012·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Objective To assess the prevalence and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) across decades and regions. Methods Electronic PubMed/Google Scholar search for studies reporting on APP, published from 1970-05/2009. Median rates and interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated and compared using non-parametric tests. Demographic and clinical variables were tested as correlates of APP in bivariate and meta-regression analyses. Results Across 147 studies (1,418,163 participants, 82.9% diagnosed with schizophrenia [IQR=42–100%]), the median APP rate was 19.6% (IQR=12.9–35.0%). Most common combinations included first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs)+second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) (42.4%, IQR=0.0–71.4%) followed by FGAs+FGAs (19.6%, IQR=0.0–100%) and SGAs+SGAs (1.8%, IQR=0.0–28%). APP rates were not different between decades (1970–1979:28.8%, IQR=7.5–44%; 1980–1989:17.6%, IQR=10.8–38.2; 1990–1999:22.0%, IQR=11–40; 2000–2009:19.2% IQR=14.4–29.9, p=0.78), but between regions, being higher in Asia and Europe than North America, and in Asia than Oceania (p<0.001). APP increased numerically by 34% in North America from the 1980s 12.7%) to 2000s (17.0%) (p=0.94) and decreased significantly by 65% from 1980 (55.5%) to 2000 (19.2%) in Asia (p=0.03), with non-significant changes in Europe. APP was associated with inpatient status (p<0.001), use of FGAs (p<0.0001) and anticholinergics (<0.001), schizophrenia (p=0.01), less antidepressant use (p=0.02), greater LAIs use (p=0.04), shorter follow-up (p=0.001) and cross-sectional vs. longitudinal study design (p=0.03). In a meta-regression, inpatient status (p<0.0001), FGA use (0.046), and schizophrenia diagnosis (p=0.004) independently predicted APP (N=66, R2=0.44, p<0.0001). Conclusions APP is common with different rates and time trends by region over the last four decades. APP is associated with greater anticholinergic requirement, shorter observation time, greater illness severity and lower antidepressant use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.018

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Gallego, J. A., Bonetti, J., Zhang, J., Kane, J. M., & Correll, C. U.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
138
Issue
1
Pages
18-28
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013615650
Cited by
332
References
120
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy: A systematic review and meta-regression of global and regional trends from the 1970s to 2009. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.018
The paper
Gallego, J. A., Bonetti, J., Zhang, J., Kane, J. M., & Correll, C. U. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy: A systematic review and meta-regression of global and regional trends from the 1970s to 2009. Schizophrenia Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.